From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Fan Ni" <fan.ni@samsung.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:09:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231012130936.00004f9a@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231003163747-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:42:37 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:34:32AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > Establishing that only register accesses of size 4 and 8 can occur
> > using these functions requires looking at their callers. Make it
> > easier to see that by using switch statements.
> > Assertions are used to enforce that the register storage is of the
> > matching size, allowing fixed values to be used for divisors of
> > the array indices.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > index f3bbf0fd13..7ef3ef2bd6 100644
> > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > @@ -67,16 +67,24 @@ static uint64_t cxl_cache_mem_read_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> > CXLComponentState *cxl_cstate = opaque;
> > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb;
> >
> > - if (size == 8) {
> > + switch (size) {
> > + case 4:
> > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) {
> > + return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, 4);
> > + } else {
> > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4);
>
> In C currently static_assert needs a message.
I switched to QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON() which seems better
+ doesn't need a additional message.
>
> In fact clang warns:
> ../hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c:75:67: error: '_Static_assert' with no message is a C2x extension [-Werror,-Wc2x-extensions]
> static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4);
>
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> > + return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4];
> > + }
> > + case 8:
> > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n");
> > return 0;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) {
> > - return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, size);
> > - } else {
> > - return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)];
> > + default:
> > + /*
> > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this
> > + * routine is not called with other sizes.
> > + */
> > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -117,25 +125,36 @@ static void cxl_cache_mem_write_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
> > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb;
> > uint32_t mask;
> >
> > - if (size == 8) {
> > + switch (size) {
> > + case 4:
> > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) == 4);
> > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4);
> > + mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / 4];
> > + value &= mask;
> > + /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */
> > + value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4];
> > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) {
> > + cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY &&
> > + offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) {
> > + dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value);
> > + } else {
> > + cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4] = value;
> > + }
> > + return;
> > + case 8:
> > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n");
> > return;
> > - }
> > - mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask)];
> > - value &= mask;
> > - /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */
> > - value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)];
> > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) {
> > - cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size);
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY &&
> > - offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) {
> > - dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value);
> > - } else {
> > - cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)] = value;
> > + default:
> > + /*
> > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this
> > + * routine is not called with other sizes.
> > + */
> > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.39.2
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Fan Ni" <fan.ni@samsung.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:09:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231012130936.00004f9a@Huawei.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20231012120936.9v_zZtZ5foCLg1ufvXncpgCvPjNouJvzmSmG7ivJmQ4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231003163747-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:42:37 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:34:32AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > Establishing that only register accesses of size 4 and 8 can occur
> > using these functions requires looking at their callers. Make it
> > easier to see that by using switch statements.
> > Assertions are used to enforce that the register storage is of the
> > matching size, allowing fixed values to be used for divisors of
> > the array indices.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > index f3bbf0fd13..7ef3ef2bd6 100644
> > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > @@ -67,16 +67,24 @@ static uint64_t cxl_cache_mem_read_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> > CXLComponentState *cxl_cstate = opaque;
> > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb;
> >
> > - if (size == 8) {
> > + switch (size) {
> > + case 4:
> > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) {
> > + return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, 4);
> > + } else {
> > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4);
>
> In C currently static_assert needs a message.
I switched to QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON() which seems better
+ doesn't need a additional message.
>
> In fact clang warns:
> ../hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c:75:67: error: '_Static_assert' with no message is a C2x extension [-Werror,-Wc2x-extensions]
> static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4);
>
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> > + return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4];
> > + }
> > + case 8:
> > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n");
> > return 0;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) {
> > - return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, size);
> > - } else {
> > - return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)];
> > + default:
> > + /*
> > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this
> > + * routine is not called with other sizes.
> > + */
> > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -117,25 +125,36 @@ static void cxl_cache_mem_write_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
> > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb;
> > uint32_t mask;
> >
> > - if (size == 8) {
> > + switch (size) {
> > + case 4:
> > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) == 4);
> > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4);
> > + mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / 4];
> > + value &= mask;
> > + /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */
> > + value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4];
> > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) {
> > + cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY &&
> > + offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) {
> > + dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value);
> > + } else {
> > + cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4] = value;
> > + }
> > + return;
> > + case 8:
> > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n");
> > return;
> > - }
> > - mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask)];
> > - value &= mask;
> > - /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */
> > - value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)];
> > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) {
> > - cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size);
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY &&
> > - offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) {
> > - dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value);
> > - } else {
> > - cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)] = value;
> > + default:
> > + /*
> > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this
> > + * routine is not called with other sizes.
> > + */
> > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 9:34 [PATCH v3 0/4] hw/cxl: Line length reduction and related Jonathan Cameron via
2023-09-19 9:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] hw/cxl: Use a switch to explicitly check size in caps_reg_read() Jonathan Cameron via
2023-09-19 9:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers Jonathan Cameron via
2023-09-20 5:08 ` Michael Tokarev
2023-09-20 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2023-10-03 20:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-12 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message]
2023-10-12 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-19 9:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] hw/cxl: CXLDVSECPortExtensions renamed to CXLDVSECPortExt Jonathan Cameron via
2023-09-19 9:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] hw/cxl: Line length reductions Jonathan Cameron via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231012130936.00004f9a@Huawei.com \
--to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.