From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] pwm: brcmstb: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for PM functions
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:45:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231016114512.0000556a@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013174204.1457085-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 19:42:09 +0200
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> This macro has the advantage over SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS that we don't have to
> care about when the functions are actually used, so the corresponding
>
> Also make use of pm_ptr() to discard all PM related stuff if CONFIG_PM
> isn't enabled.
>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Given the bit I commented on in v1 has gone away...
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c
> index b723c2d4f485..0fdeb0b2dbf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static int brcmstb_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int brcmstb_pwm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct brcmstb_pwm *p = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -275,17 +274,16 @@ static int brcmstb_pwm_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> return clk_prepare_enable(p->clk);
> }
> -#endif
>
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(brcmstb_pwm_pm_ops, brcmstb_pwm_suspend,
> - brcmstb_pwm_resume);
> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(brcmstb_pwm_pm_ops, brcmstb_pwm_suspend,
> + brcmstb_pwm_resume);
>
> static struct platform_driver brcmstb_pwm_driver = {
> .probe = brcmstb_pwm_probe,
> .driver = {
> .name = "pwm-brcmstb",
> .of_match_table = brcmstb_pwm_of_match,
> - .pm = &brcmstb_pwm_pm_ops,
> + .pm = pm_ptr(&brcmstb_pwm_pm_ops),
> },
> };
> module_platform_driver(brcmstb_pwm_driver);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] pwm: brcmstb: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for PM functions
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:45:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231016114512.0000556a@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013174204.1457085-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 19:42:09 +0200
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> This macro has the advantage over SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS that we don't have to
> care about when the functions are actually used, so the corresponding
>
> Also make use of pm_ptr() to discard all PM related stuff if CONFIG_PM
> isn't enabled.
>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Given the bit I commented on in v1 has gone away...
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c
> index b723c2d4f485..0fdeb0b2dbf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-brcmstb.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static int brcmstb_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int brcmstb_pwm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct brcmstb_pwm *p = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -275,17 +274,16 @@ static int brcmstb_pwm_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> return clk_prepare_enable(p->clk);
> }
> -#endif
>
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(brcmstb_pwm_pm_ops, brcmstb_pwm_suspend,
> - brcmstb_pwm_resume);
> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(brcmstb_pwm_pm_ops, brcmstb_pwm_suspend,
> + brcmstb_pwm_resume);
>
> static struct platform_driver brcmstb_pwm_driver = {
> .probe = brcmstb_pwm_probe,
> .driver = {
> .name = "pwm-brcmstb",
> .of_match_table = brcmstb_pwm_of_match,
> - .pm = &brcmstb_pwm_pm_ops,
> + .pm = pm_ptr(&brcmstb_pwm_pm_ops),
> },
> };
> module_platform_driver(brcmstb_pwm_driver);
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-13 17:42 [PATCH v2 00/11] pwm: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for PM functions Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] pwm: atmel-hlcdc: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-23 17:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-23 17:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] pwm: atmel-tcb: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] pwm: berlin: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] pwm: brcmstb: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-16 10:45 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-10-16 10:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] pwm: dwc: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] pwm: imx-tpm: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] pwm: samsung: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] pwm: stm32-lp: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] pwm: stm32: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] pwm: tiecap: " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-13 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] pwm: tiehrpwm: " Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231016114512.0000556a@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.