Re: [PATCH] powerpc/perf: Optimize find_alternatives_list() using binary search

[Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 12:41:45PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com> writes:
> > This patch improves the performance of event alternative lookup by
> > replacing the previous linear search with a more efficient binary
> > search. This change reduces the time complexity for the search process
> > from O(n) to O(log(n)). A pre-sorted table of event values and their
> > corresponding indices has been introduced to expedite the search
> > process.
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> 
> How did you test this? I assume you don't have a Power6 machine lying
> around? :)
> 
> cheers
> 

I indeed do not have a Power6 machine for testing. Therefore, I designed
a simple unit test [1] to verify the functionality of the patch. In this
test, I ran a loop from 0 to UINT_MAX, using these values as inputs to
compare the return values of the original function with the new function
I implemented, which utilizes binary search. If you have any suggestions
for a more suitable testing method, please let me know. I would greatly
appreciate your feedback.

Thanks,
Kuan-Wei Chiu

[1]:
/* return 0 on success and return non-zero on failure */
int test()
{
    u64 event = 0;
    for (u64 event = 0; event <= UINT_MAX; event++) {
        /* result of the current function in the linux kernel */
	int result_old = find_alternatives_list(event);
	/* result of the new function using binary search */
	int result_new = find_alternatives_list_new(event);

	if (result_old != result_new)
	    return 1;
    }
    return 0;
}


> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> > index 5729b6e059de..b6030ea130eb 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> > @@ -335,25 +335,34 @@ static const unsigned int event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
> >  	{ 0x3000fe, 0x400056 },			/* PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS */
> >  };
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * This could be made more efficient with a binary search on
> > - * a presorted list, if necessary
> > - */
> >  static int find_alternatives_list(u64 event)
> >  {
> > -	int i, j;
> > -	unsigned int alt;
> > -
> > -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(event_alternatives); ++i) {
> > -		if (event < event_alternatives[i][0])
> > -			return -1;
> > -		for (j = 0; j < MAX_ALT; ++j) {
> > -			alt = event_alternatives[i][j];
> > -			if (!alt || event < alt)
> > -				break;
> > -			if (event == alt)
> > -				return i;
> > -		}
> > +	const unsigned int presort_event_table[] = {
> > +		0x0130e8, 0x080080, 0x080088, 0x10000a, 0x10000b, 0x10000d, 0x10000e,
> > +		0x100010, 0x10001a, 0x100026, 0x100054, 0x100056, 0x1000f0, 0x1000f8,
> > +		0x1000fc, 0x200008, 0x20000e, 0x200010, 0x200012, 0x200054, 0x2000f0,
> > +		0x2000f2, 0x2000f4, 0x2000f5, 0x2000f6, 0x2000f8, 0x2000fc, 0x2000fe,
> > +		0x2d0030, 0x30000a, 0x30000c, 0x300010, 0x300012, 0x30001a, 0x300056,
> > +		0x3000f0, 0x3000f2, 0x3000f6, 0x3000f8, 0x3000fc, 0x3000fe, 0x400006,
> > +		0x400007, 0x40000a, 0x40000e, 0x400010, 0x400018, 0x400056, 0x4000f0,
> > +		0x4000f8, 0x600005};
> > +	const unsigned int event_index_table[] = {
> > +		0,  1,  2,  3,  4,  1, 5,  6,  7,  8,  9,  10, 11, 12, 13, 12, 14,
> > +		7,  15, 2,  9,  16, 3, 4,  0,  17, 10, 18, 19, 20, 1,  17, 15, 19,
> > +		18, 2,  16, 21, 8,  0, 22, 13, 14, 11, 21, 5,  20, 22, 1,  6,  3};
> > +	int lo = 0;
> > +	int hi = ARRAY_SIZE(presort_event_table) - 1;
> > +
> > +	while (lo <= hi) {
> > +		int mid = lo + (hi - lo) / 2;
> > +		unsigned int alt = presort_event_table[mid];
> > +
> > +		if (alt < event)
> > +			lo = mid + 1;
> > +		else if (alt > event)
> > +			hi = mid - 1;
> > +		else
> > +			return event_index_table[mid];
> >  	}
> >  	return -1;
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1