From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration failure
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:19:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231027131904.165c7ad6.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231026183250.254432-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:32:44 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Since this scenario is very unlikely to happen and there is no status
> response code to indicate an invalid ISC value, let's set the
Again invalid ISC won't happen except for hypervisor messes up.
> response code to 06 indicating 'Invalid address of AP-queue notification
> byte'. While this is not entirely accurate, it is better than indicating
> that the ZONE/GISA designation is invalid which is something the guest
> can do nothing about since those values are set by the hypervisor.
And more importantly AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_GISA is not valid for G2 in
the given scenario, since G2 is not trying to set up interrupts on behalf
of the G3 with a G3 GISA, but G2 is trying to set up interrupts for
itself. And then AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_GISA is architecturally simply not
a valid RC!
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Except for the explanation in the commit message, the patch is good. It
is up to you if you want to fix the commit message or not.
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-27 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 18:32 [PATCH v3 0/3] a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function Tony Krowiak
2023-10-26 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] s390/vfio-ap: unpin pages on gisc registration failure Tony Krowiak
2023-10-26 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 " Tony Krowiak
2023-10-27 8:25 ` Harald Freudenberger
2023-10-27 11:19 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2023-10-26 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] s390/vfio-ap: improve reaction to response code 07 from PQAP(AQIC) command Tony Krowiak
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-11-09 16:44 [PATCH v3 0/3] s390/vfio-ap: a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function Tony Krowiak
2023-11-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration failure Tony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231027131904.165c7ad6.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.