All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, jjherne@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
	imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration failure
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:25:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1ef49cb13547f9c51e47534d3f18e2a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231026183250.254432-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>

On 2023-10-26 20:32, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> The interception handler for the PQAP(AQIC) command calls the
> kvm_s390_gisc_register function to register the guest ISC with the 
> channel
> subsystem. If that call fails, the status response code 08 - indicating
> Invalid ZONE/GISA designation - is returned to the guest. This response
> code does not make sense because the non-zero return code from the
> kvm_s390_gisc_register function can be due one of two things: Either 
> the
> ISC passed as a parameter by the guest to the PQAP(AQIC) command is 
> greater
> than the maximum ISC value allowed, or the guest is not using a GISA.
> 
> Since this scenario is very unlikely to happen and there is no status
> response code to indicate an invalid ISC value, let's set the
> response code to 06 indicating 'Invalid address of AP-queue 
> notification
> byte'. While this is not entirely accurate, it is better than 
> indicating
> that the ZONE/GISA designation is invalid which is something the guest
> can do nothing about since those values are set by the hypervisor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 9cb28978c186..25d7ce2094f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ static int ensure_nib_shared(unsigned long addr,
> struct gmap *gmap)
>   * Register the guest ISC to GIB interface and retrieve the
>   * host ISC to issue the host side PQAP/AQIC
>   *
> - * Response.status may be set to AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_ADDRESS in case 
> the
> - * vfio_pin_pages failed.
> + * status.response_code may be set to AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_ADDRESS in 
> case the
> + * vfio_pin_pages or kvm_s390_gisc_register failed.
>   *
>   * Otherwise return the ap_queue_status returned by the ap_aqic(),
>   * all retry handling will be done by the guest.
> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static struct ap_queue_status
> vfio_ap_irq_enable(struct vfio_ap_queue *q,
>  				 __func__, nisc, isc, q->apqn);
> 
>  		vfio_unpin_pages(&q->matrix_mdev->vdev, nib, 1);
> -		status.response_code = AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_GISA;
> +		status.response_code = AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_ADDRESS;
>  		return status;
>  	}

Interesting ... The INVALID_GISA is handled in the default arm of the 
switch
in ap_queue.c but the INVALID_ADDRESS is handled as irq enablement 
failed.
So this change fits more to the current AP bus code. Thanks

Reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-27  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-26 18:32 [PATCH v3 0/3] a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function Tony Krowiak
2023-10-26 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] s390/vfio-ap: unpin pages on gisc registration failure Tony Krowiak
2023-10-26 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 " Tony Krowiak
2023-10-27  8:25   ` Harald Freudenberger [this message]
2023-10-27 11:19   ` Halil Pasic
2023-10-26 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] s390/vfio-ap: improve reaction to response code 07 from PQAP(AQIC) command Tony Krowiak
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-11-09 16:44 [PATCH v3 0/3] s390/vfio-ap: a couple of corrections to the IRQ enablement function Tony Krowiak
2023-11-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/vfio-ap: set status response code to 06 on gisc registration failure Tony Krowiak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b1ef49cb13547f9c51e47534d3f18e2a@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.