From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] regulator: bcm590xx: Add support for BCM59054
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 23:04:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202311062220.2gWiPqvR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231030-bcm59054-v1-5-3517f980c1e3@gmail.com>
Hi Artur,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 05d3ef8bba77c1b5f98d941d8b2d4aeab8118ef1]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Artur-Weber/dt-bindings-mfd-brcm-bcm59056-Convert-to-YAML/20231031-040046
base: 05d3ef8bba77c1b5f98d941d8b2d4aeab8118ef1
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231030-bcm59054-v1-5-3517f980c1e3%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH 5/6] regulator: bcm590xx: Add support for BCM59054
config: powerpc64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231106/202311062220.2gWiPqvR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231106/202311062220.2gWiPqvR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311062220.2gWiPqvR-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c:591:13: warning: variable 'n_regulators' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
591 | } else if (pmu->mfd->device_type == BCM59056_TYPE) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c:597:6: note: uninitialized use occurs here
597 | n_regulators,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c:591:9: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
591 | } else if (pmu->mfd->device_type == BCM59056_TYPE) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c:577:18: note: initialize the variable 'n_regulators' to silence this warning
577 | int n_regulators;
| ^
| = 0
1 warning generated.
vim +591 drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c
569
570 static int bcm590xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
571 {
572 struct bcm590xx *bcm590xx = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
573 struct bcm590xx_reg *pmu;
574 struct regulator_config config = { };
575 struct bcm590xx_info *info;
576 struct regulator_dev *rdev;
577 int n_regulators;
578 int i;
579
580 pmu = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
581 if (!pmu)
582 return -ENOMEM;
583
584 pmu->mfd = bcm590xx;
585
586 platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu);
587
588 if (pmu->mfd->device_type == BCM59054_TYPE) {
589 info = bcm59054_regs;
590 n_regulators = BCM59054_NUM_REGS;
> 591 } else if (pmu->mfd->device_type == BCM59056_TYPE) {
592 info = bcm59056_regs;
593 n_regulators = BCM59056_NUM_REGS;
594 }
595
596 pmu->desc = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
597 n_regulators,
598 sizeof(struct regulator_desc),
599 GFP_KERNEL);
600 if (!pmu->desc)
601 return -ENOMEM;
602
603 /* Register the regulators */
604 for (i = 0; i < n_regulators; i++, info++) {
605 pmu->desc[i].name = info->name;
606 pmu->desc[i].of_match = of_match_ptr(info->name);
607 pmu->desc[i].regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators");
608 pmu->desc[i].supply_name = info->vin_name;
609 pmu->desc[i].id = i;
610 pmu->desc[i].volt_table = info->volt_table;
611 pmu->desc[i].n_voltages = info->n_voltages;
612 pmu->desc[i].linear_ranges = info->linear_ranges;
613 pmu->desc[i].n_linear_ranges = info->n_linear_ranges;
614
615 if (bcm590xx_reg_is_ldo(pmu, i) || \
616 bcm590xx_reg_is_gpldo(pmu, i)) {
617 pmu->desc[i].ops = &bcm590xx_ops_ldo;
618 pmu->desc[i].vsel_mask = BCM590XX_LDO_VSEL_MASK;
619 } else if (bcm590xx_reg_is_static(pmu, i)) {
620 pmu->desc[i].ops = &bcm590xx_ops_static;
621 } else {
622 pmu->desc[i].ops = &bcm590xx_ops_dcdc;
623 pmu->desc[i].vsel_mask = BCM590XX_SR_VSEL_MASK;
624 }
625
626 if (bcm590xx_reg_is_vbus(pmu, i)) {
627 pmu->desc[i].enable_mask = BCM590XX_VBUS_ENABLE;
628 } else {
629 pmu->desc[i].vsel_reg = \
630 bcm590xx_get_vsel_register(pmu, i);
631 pmu->desc[i].enable_mask = \
632 bcm590xx_get_enable_mask(pmu, i);
633 pmu->desc[i].enable_is_inverted = true;
634 }
635 pmu->desc[i].enable_reg = \
636 bcm590xx_get_enable_register(pmu, i);
637 pmu->desc[i].type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
638 pmu->desc[i].owner = THIS_MODULE;
639
640 config.dev = pmu->mfd->dev;
641 config.driver_data = pmu;
642 if (bcm590xx_reg_is_secondary(pmu, i))
643 config.regmap = pmu->mfd->regmap_sec;
644 else
645 config.regmap = pmu->mfd->regmap_pri;
646
647 rdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, &pmu->desc[i],
648 &config);
649 if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
650 dev_err(bcm590xx->dev,
651 "failed to register %s regulator\n",
652 pdev->name);
653 return PTR_ERR(rdev);
654 }
655 }
656
657 return 0;
658 }
659
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] regulator: bcm590xx: Add support for BCM59054
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 23:04:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202311062220.2gWiPqvR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231030-bcm59054-v1-5-3517f980c1e3@gmail.com>
Hi Artur,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 05d3ef8bba77c1b5f98d941d8b2d4aeab8118ef1]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Artur-Weber/dt-bindings-mfd-brcm-bcm59056-Convert-to-YAML/20231031-040046
base: 05d3ef8bba77c1b5f98d941d8b2d4aeab8118ef1
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231030-bcm59054-v1-5-3517f980c1e3%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH 5/6] regulator: bcm590xx: Add support for BCM59054
config: powerpc64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231106/202311062220.2gWiPqvR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231106/202311062220.2gWiPqvR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311062220.2gWiPqvR-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c:591:13: warning: variable 'n_regulators' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
591 | } else if (pmu->mfd->device_type == BCM59056_TYPE) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c:597:6: note: uninitialized use occurs here
597 | n_regulators,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c:591:9: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
591 | } else if (pmu->mfd->device_type == BCM59056_TYPE) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c:577:18: note: initialize the variable 'n_regulators' to silence this warning
577 | int n_regulators;
| ^
| = 0
1 warning generated.
vim +591 drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c
569
570 static int bcm590xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
571 {
572 struct bcm590xx *bcm590xx = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
573 struct bcm590xx_reg *pmu;
574 struct regulator_config config = { };
575 struct bcm590xx_info *info;
576 struct regulator_dev *rdev;
577 int n_regulators;
578 int i;
579
580 pmu = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
581 if (!pmu)
582 return -ENOMEM;
583
584 pmu->mfd = bcm590xx;
585
586 platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu);
587
588 if (pmu->mfd->device_type == BCM59054_TYPE) {
589 info = bcm59054_regs;
590 n_regulators = BCM59054_NUM_REGS;
> 591 } else if (pmu->mfd->device_type == BCM59056_TYPE) {
592 info = bcm59056_regs;
593 n_regulators = BCM59056_NUM_REGS;
594 }
595
596 pmu->desc = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
597 n_regulators,
598 sizeof(struct regulator_desc),
599 GFP_KERNEL);
600 if (!pmu->desc)
601 return -ENOMEM;
602
603 /* Register the regulators */
604 for (i = 0; i < n_regulators; i++, info++) {
605 pmu->desc[i].name = info->name;
606 pmu->desc[i].of_match = of_match_ptr(info->name);
607 pmu->desc[i].regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators");
608 pmu->desc[i].supply_name = info->vin_name;
609 pmu->desc[i].id = i;
610 pmu->desc[i].volt_table = info->volt_table;
611 pmu->desc[i].n_voltages = info->n_voltages;
612 pmu->desc[i].linear_ranges = info->linear_ranges;
613 pmu->desc[i].n_linear_ranges = info->n_linear_ranges;
614
615 if (bcm590xx_reg_is_ldo(pmu, i) || \
616 bcm590xx_reg_is_gpldo(pmu, i)) {
617 pmu->desc[i].ops = &bcm590xx_ops_ldo;
618 pmu->desc[i].vsel_mask = BCM590XX_LDO_VSEL_MASK;
619 } else if (bcm590xx_reg_is_static(pmu, i)) {
620 pmu->desc[i].ops = &bcm590xx_ops_static;
621 } else {
622 pmu->desc[i].ops = &bcm590xx_ops_dcdc;
623 pmu->desc[i].vsel_mask = BCM590XX_SR_VSEL_MASK;
624 }
625
626 if (bcm590xx_reg_is_vbus(pmu, i)) {
627 pmu->desc[i].enable_mask = BCM590XX_VBUS_ENABLE;
628 } else {
629 pmu->desc[i].vsel_reg = \
630 bcm590xx_get_vsel_register(pmu, i);
631 pmu->desc[i].enable_mask = \
632 bcm590xx_get_enable_mask(pmu, i);
633 pmu->desc[i].enable_is_inverted = true;
634 }
635 pmu->desc[i].enable_reg = \
636 bcm590xx_get_enable_register(pmu, i);
637 pmu->desc[i].type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
638 pmu->desc[i].owner = THIS_MODULE;
639
640 config.dev = pmu->mfd->dev;
641 config.driver_data = pmu;
642 if (bcm590xx_reg_is_secondary(pmu, i))
643 config.regmap = pmu->mfd->regmap_sec;
644 else
645 config.regmap = pmu->mfd->regmap_pri;
646
647 rdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, &pmu->desc[i],
648 &config);
649 if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
650 dev_err(bcm590xx->dev,
651 "failed to register %s regulator\n",
652 pdev->name);
653 return PTR_ERR(rdev);
654 }
655 }
656
657 return 0;
658 }
659
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-06 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-30 19:36 [PATCH 0/6] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for BCM59054 Artur Weber
2023-10-30 19:36 ` Artur Weber
2023-10-30 19:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Convert to YAML Artur Weber
2023-10-30 19:36 ` Artur Weber
2023-10-31 5:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-31 5:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-31 9:36 ` Artur Weber
2023-10-31 9:36 ` Artur Weber
2023-10-31 13:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-31 13:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-30 19:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Add compatible for BCM59054 Artur Weber
2023-10-30 19:36 ` Artur Weber
2023-10-31 5:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-31 5:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-30 19:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dts: Drop DTS for BCM59056 PMIC Artur Weber
2023-10-30 19:36 ` Artur Weber
2023-10-30 19:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] mfd: bcm590xx: Add compatible for BCM59054 Artur Weber
2023-10-30 19:36 ` Artur Weber
2023-10-31 3:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-31 3:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-06 9:46 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-06 9:46 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-30 19:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] regulator: bcm590xx: Add support " Artur Weber
2023-10-30 19:36 ` Artur Weber
2023-11-06 15:04 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-11-06 15:04 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-30 19:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] regulator: bcm590xx: Add proper handling for PMMODE registers Artur Weber
2023-10-30 19:36 ` Artur Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202311062220.2gWiPqvR-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=aweber.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=stano.jakubek@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.