From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Sachin Bahadur <sachin.bahadur@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2] ice: Block PF reinit if attached to bond
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:42:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231115174221.GU74656@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231113235856.772920-1-sachin.bahadur@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 03:58:56PM -0800, Sachin Bahadur wrote:
> PF interface part of LAG should not allow driver reinit via devlink. The
> Bond config will be lost due to driver reinit. ice_devlink_reload_down is
> called before PF driver reinit. If PF is attached to bond,
> ice_devlink_reload_down returns error.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Bahadur <sachin.bahadur@intel.com>
Hi Sachin,
I wonder if this should have a Fixes tag and be targeted at iwl-net.
It does feel like a bug from the description, but I could be wrong.
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Sachin Bahadur <sachin.bahadur@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2] ice: Block PF reinit if attached to bond
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:42:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231115174221.GU74656@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231113235856.772920-1-sachin.bahadur@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 03:58:56PM -0800, Sachin Bahadur wrote:
> PF interface part of LAG should not allow driver reinit via devlink. The
> Bond config will be lost due to driver reinit. ice_devlink_reload_down is
> called before PF driver reinit. If PF is attached to bond,
> ice_devlink_reload_down returns error.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Bahadur <sachin.bahadur@intel.com>
Hi Sachin,
I wonder if this should have a Fixes tag and be targeted at iwl-net.
It does feel like a bug from the description, but I could be wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-15 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-13 23:58 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2] ice: Block PF reinit if attached to bond Sachin Bahadur
2023-11-13 23:58 ` Sachin Bahadur
2023-11-15 17:42 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-11-15 17:42 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231115174221.GU74656@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sachin.bahadur@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.