All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
Cc: Viacheslav Bocharov <adeep@lexina.in>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	<oxffffaa@gmail.com>, <kernel@sberdevices.ru>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: handle OOB buffer according OOB layout
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:06:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124100657.245d258f@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab3f6734-357c-9937-2e21-a935850d3af8@salutedevices.com>

Hi Arseniy,

avkrasnov@salutedevices.com wrote on Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:50:54 +0300:

> Hello all, 2 weeks from 9.11, please ping

I'm waiting for Viacheslav.

> 
> Thanks, Arseniy
> 
> 
> On 09.11.2023 12:09, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> > Hello, thanks for review!
> > 
> > On 09.11.2023 11:06, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:  
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:  
> >>> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
> >>> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
> >>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>>  	__le64 *info;
> >>>  	int i, count;
> >>>  
> >>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count];
> >>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;  
> >> Seems something wrong with your logic here.
> >> I think this code should most likely look like this:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>     *info |= oob_buf[count];
> >>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >>       *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> >> }  
> > 
> > For 64 bytes OOB and 512 bytes ECC this driver reports free areas as:
> > 
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > 
> > where AA is free byte(user byte), BB - ECC codes. So to access user bytes
> > we need bytes 0,1,16,17,32,33,48,49. nand->ecc.bytes == 14, so 'count' is
> > increased at 16 every iteration, so i guess this is correct.
> > 
> > WDYT?
> > 
> > Thanks, Arseniy
> >   
> >>
> >>  
> >>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>>  	__le64 *info;
> >>>  	int i, count;
> >>>  
> >>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>>  		oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >>>  		oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;  
> >> And there:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>     oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >>         oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Viacheslav Bocharov
> >>  


Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
Cc: Viacheslav Bocharov <adeep@lexina.in>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	<oxffffaa@gmail.com>, <kernel@sberdevices.ru>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: handle OOB buffer according OOB layout
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:06:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124100657.245d258f@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab3f6734-357c-9937-2e21-a935850d3af8@salutedevices.com>

Hi Arseniy,

avkrasnov@salutedevices.com wrote on Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:50:54 +0300:

> Hello all, 2 weeks from 9.11, please ping

I'm waiting for Viacheslav.

> 
> Thanks, Arseniy
> 
> 
> On 09.11.2023 12:09, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> > Hello, thanks for review!
> > 
> > On 09.11.2023 11:06, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:  
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:  
> >>> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
> >>> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
> >>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>>  	__le64 *info;
> >>>  	int i, count;
> >>>  
> >>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count];
> >>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;  
> >> Seems something wrong with your logic here.
> >> I think this code should most likely look like this:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>     *info |= oob_buf[count];
> >>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >>       *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> >> }  
> > 
> > For 64 bytes OOB and 512 bytes ECC this driver reports free areas as:
> > 
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > 
> > where AA is free byte(user byte), BB - ECC codes. So to access user bytes
> > we need bytes 0,1,16,17,32,33,48,49. nand->ecc.bytes == 14, so 'count' is
> > increased at 16 every iteration, so i guess this is correct.
> > 
> > WDYT?
> > 
> > Thanks, Arseniy
> >   
> >>
> >>  
> >>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>>  	__le64 *info;
> >>>  	int i, count;
> >>>  
> >>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>>  		oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >>>  		oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;  
> >> And there:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>     oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >>         oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Viacheslav Bocharov
> >>  


Thanks,
Miquèl

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
Cc: Viacheslav Bocharov <adeep@lexina.in>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	<oxffffaa@gmail.com>, <kernel@sberdevices.ru>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: handle OOB buffer according OOB layout
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:06:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124100657.245d258f@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab3f6734-357c-9937-2e21-a935850d3af8@salutedevices.com>

Hi Arseniy,

avkrasnov@salutedevices.com wrote on Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:50:54 +0300:

> Hello all, 2 weeks from 9.11, please ping

I'm waiting for Viacheslav.

> 
> Thanks, Arseniy
> 
> 
> On 09.11.2023 12:09, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> > Hello, thanks for review!
> > 
> > On 09.11.2023 11:06, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:  
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:  
> >>> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
> >>> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
> >>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>>  	__le64 *info;
> >>>  	int i, count;
> >>>  
> >>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count];
> >>>  		*info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;  
> >> Seems something wrong with your logic here.
> >> I think this code should most likely look like this:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>     *info |= oob_buf[count];
> >>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >>       *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> >> }  
> > 
> > For 64 bytes OOB and 512 bytes ECC this driver reports free areas as:
> > 
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > 
> > where AA is free byte(user byte), BB - ECC codes. So to access user bytes
> > we need bytes 0,1,16,17,32,33,48,49. nand->ecc.bytes == 14, so 'count' is
> > increased at 16 every iteration, so i guess this is correct.
> > 
> > WDYT?
> > 
> > Thanks, Arseniy
> >   
> >>
> >>  
> >>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>>  	__le64 *info;
> >>>  	int i, count;
> >>>  
> >>> -	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> +	for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>>  		info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>>  		oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >>>  		oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;  
> >> And there:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >>     info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>     oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >>     if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >>         oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Viacheslav Bocharov
> >>  


Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-09  5:39 [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: handle OOB buffer according OOB layout Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-09  5:39 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-09  5:39 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-09  5:39 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-09  8:06 ` Viacheslav Bocharov
2023-11-09  8:06   ` Viacheslav Bocharov
2023-11-09  8:06   ` Viacheslav Bocharov
2023-11-09  8:06   ` Viacheslav Bocharov
2023-11-09  9:09   ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-09  9:09     ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-09  9:09     ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-09  9:09     ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-24  7:50     ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-24  7:50       ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-24  7:50       ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-24  9:06       ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2023-11-24  9:06         ` Miquel Raynal
2023-11-24  9:06         ` Miquel Raynal
2023-11-24 10:14         ` Viacheslav
2023-11-24 10:14           ` Viacheslav
2023-11-24 10:14           ` Viacheslav
2023-11-30 10:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-11-30 10:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-11-30 10:36   ` Miquel Raynal
2023-11-30 10:36   ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231124100657.245d258f@xps-13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=adeep@lexina.in \
    --cc=avkrasnov@salutedevices.com \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.