From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, kw@linux.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, robh@kernel.org,
roy.zang@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_*
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:16:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231130164612.GU3043@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129214412.327633-4-Frank.Li@nxp.com>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 04:44:11PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> 'pf' and 'lut' is just difference name in difference chips, but basic it is
> a MMIO base address plus an offset.
>
> Rename it to avoid duplicate pf_* and lut_* in driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Can you fix the name in pci-layerscape-ep.c also?
- Mani
> ---
>
> Notes:
> pf_lut is better than pf_* or lut* because some chip use 'pf', some chip
> use 'lut'.
>
> change from v1 to v4
> - new patch at v3
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 34 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index 42bca2c3b5c3e..590e07bb27002 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
> #define PCIE_IATU_NUM 6
>
> struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> - const u32 pf_off;
> + const u32 pf_lut_off;
> const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
> int (*exit_from_l2)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
> bool scfg_support;
> @@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> struct ls_pcie {
> struct dw_pcie *pci;
> const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> - void __iomem *pf_base;
> + void __iomem *pf_lut_base;
> struct regmap *scfg;
> int index;
> bool big_endian;
> };
>
> -#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr) ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
> +#define ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr(addr) ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, addr)
> #define to_ls_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>
> static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -101,20 +101,20 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
> }
>
> -static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +static u32 ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> {
> if (pcie->big_endian)
> - return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
> + return ioread32be(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>
> - return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
> + return ioread32(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
> }
>
> -static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +static void ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> {
> if (pcie->big_endian)
> - iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> + iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
> else
> - iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> + iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
> }
>
> static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> @@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> u32 val;
> int ret;
>
> - val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> + val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
> - ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> + ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>
> - ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR),
> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US);
> @@ -147,15 +147,15 @@ static int ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> * Set PF_MCR_EXL2S bit in LS_PCIE_PF_MCR register for the link
> * to exit L2 state.
> */
> - val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> + val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
> - ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> + ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>
> /*
> * L2 exit timeout of 10ms is not defined in the specifications,
> * it was chosen based on empirical observations.
> */
> - ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S),
> 1000,
> 10000);
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
> };
>
> static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
> - .pf_off = 0xc0000,
> + .pf_lut_off = 0xc0000,
> .pm_support = true,
> .exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
> };
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
>
> - pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> + pcie->pf_lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_lut_off;
>
> if (pcie->drvdata->scfg_support) {
> pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "fsl,pcie-scfg");
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, kw@linux.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, roy.zang@nxp.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_*
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:16:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231130164612.GU3043@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129214412.327633-4-Frank.Li@nxp.com>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 04:44:11PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> 'pf' and 'lut' is just difference name in difference chips, but basic it is
> a MMIO base address plus an offset.
>
> Rename it to avoid duplicate pf_* and lut_* in driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Can you fix the name in pci-layerscape-ep.c also?
- Mani
> ---
>
> Notes:
> pf_lut is better than pf_* or lut* because some chip use 'pf', some chip
> use 'lut'.
>
> change from v1 to v4
> - new patch at v3
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 34 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index 42bca2c3b5c3e..590e07bb27002 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
> #define PCIE_IATU_NUM 6
>
> struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> - const u32 pf_off;
> + const u32 pf_lut_off;
> const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
> int (*exit_from_l2)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
> bool scfg_support;
> @@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> struct ls_pcie {
> struct dw_pcie *pci;
> const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> - void __iomem *pf_base;
> + void __iomem *pf_lut_base;
> struct regmap *scfg;
> int index;
> bool big_endian;
> };
>
> -#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr) ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
> +#define ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr(addr) ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, addr)
> #define to_ls_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>
> static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -101,20 +101,20 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
> }
>
> -static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +static u32 ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> {
> if (pcie->big_endian)
> - return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
> + return ioread32be(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>
> - return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
> + return ioread32(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
> }
>
> -static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +static void ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> {
> if (pcie->big_endian)
> - iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> + iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
> else
> - iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> + iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
> }
>
> static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> @@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> u32 val;
> int ret;
>
> - val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> + val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
> - ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> + ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>
> - ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR),
> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US);
> @@ -147,15 +147,15 @@ static int ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> * Set PF_MCR_EXL2S bit in LS_PCIE_PF_MCR register for the link
> * to exit L2 state.
> */
> - val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> + val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
> - ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> + ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>
> /*
> * L2 exit timeout of 10ms is not defined in the specifications,
> * it was chosen based on empirical observations.
> */
> - ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S),
> 1000,
> 10000);
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
> };
>
> static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
> - .pf_off = 0xc0000,
> + .pf_lut_off = 0xc0000,
> .pm_support = true,
> .exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
> };
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
>
> - pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> + pcie->pf_lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_lut_off;
>
> if (pcie->drvdata->scfg_support) {
> pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "fsl,pcie-scfg");
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, kw@linux.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, robh@kernel.org,
roy.zang@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_*
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:16:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231130164612.GU3043@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129214412.327633-4-Frank.Li@nxp.com>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 04:44:11PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> 'pf' and 'lut' is just difference name in difference chips, but basic it is
> a MMIO base address plus an offset.
>
> Rename it to avoid duplicate pf_* and lut_* in driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Can you fix the name in pci-layerscape-ep.c also?
- Mani
> ---
>
> Notes:
> pf_lut is better than pf_* or lut* because some chip use 'pf', some chip
> use 'lut'.
>
> change from v1 to v4
> - new patch at v3
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 34 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index 42bca2c3b5c3e..590e07bb27002 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
> #define PCIE_IATU_NUM 6
>
> struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> - const u32 pf_off;
> + const u32 pf_lut_off;
> const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
> int (*exit_from_l2)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
> bool scfg_support;
> @@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> struct ls_pcie {
> struct dw_pcie *pci;
> const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> - void __iomem *pf_base;
> + void __iomem *pf_lut_base;
> struct regmap *scfg;
> int index;
> bool big_endian;
> };
>
> -#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr) ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
> +#define ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr(addr) ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, addr)
> #define to_ls_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>
> static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -101,20 +101,20 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
> }
>
> -static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +static u32 ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> {
> if (pcie->big_endian)
> - return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
> + return ioread32be(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>
> - return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
> + return ioread32(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
> }
>
> -static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +static void ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> {
> if (pcie->big_endian)
> - iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> + iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
> else
> - iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> + iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
> }
>
> static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> @@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> u32 val;
> int ret;
>
> - val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> + val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
> - ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> + ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>
> - ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR),
> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US);
> @@ -147,15 +147,15 @@ static int ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> * Set PF_MCR_EXL2S bit in LS_PCIE_PF_MCR register for the link
> * to exit L2 state.
> */
> - val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> + val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
> - ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> + ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>
> /*
> * L2 exit timeout of 10ms is not defined in the specifications,
> * it was chosen based on empirical observations.
> */
> - ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S),
> 1000,
> 10000);
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
> };
>
> static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
> - .pf_off = 0xc0000,
> + .pf_lut_off = 0xc0000,
> .pm_support = true,
> .exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
> };
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
>
> - pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> + pcie->pf_lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_lut_off;
>
> if (pcie->drvdata->scfg_support) {
> pcie->scfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "fsl,pcie-scfg");
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-30 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-29 21:44 [PATCH v4 0/4] dwc general suspend/resume functionality Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI: layerscape: Add function pointer for exit_from_l2() Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: layerscape: Add suspend/resume for ls1021a Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-30 16:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-30 16:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-30 16:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-29 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_* Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-30 16:46 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-11-30 16:46 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-30 16:46 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-29 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: layerscape: Add suspend/resume for ls1043a Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-29 21:44 ` Frank Li
2023-11-30 16:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-30 16:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-30 16:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-30 20:17 ` Frank Li
2023-11-30 20:17 ` Frank Li
2023-11-30 20:17 ` Frank Li
2023-11-30 20:22 ` Frank Li
2023-11-30 20:22 ` Frank Li
2023-11-30 20:22 ` Frank Li
2023-12-01 3:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-01 3:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-01 3:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-01 3:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-01 3:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-01 3:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231130164612.GU3043@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=minghuan.Lian@nxp.com \
--cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.