From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"naoya.horiguchi@nec.com" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"linmiaohe@huawei.com" <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"shiju.jose@huawei.com" <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"kevin.tian@intel.com" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Aniket Agashe <aniketa@nvidia.com>, Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
"Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@nvidia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Andy Currid <acurrid@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Anuj Aggarwal (SW-GPU)" <anuaggarwal@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <danw@nvidia.com>, Matt Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: Change ghes code to allow poison of non-struct pfn
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:55:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231204155554.GG1493156@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR12MB3763A85483534C7FD50529C8B086A@BY5PR12MB3763.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 03:54:52PM +0000, Ankit Agrawal wrote:
> >> It wasn't removed. patch 1 moved it to memory_failure() where it makes
> >> a lot more sense.
> >
> > Why is this a separate patch then?
>
> This was done to keep ghes code separate from the memory failure code.
> I can merge them if that is preferable.
A single patch to move just this code could be a good idea
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"naoya.horiguchi@nec.com" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"linmiaohe@huawei.com" <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"shiju.jose@huawei.com" <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"kevin.tian@intel.com" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Aniket Agashe <aniketa@nvidia.com>, Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
"Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@nvidia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Andy Currid <acurrid@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Anuj Aggarwal (SW-GPU)" <anuaggarwal@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <danw@nvidia.com>, Matt Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: Change ghes code to allow poison of non-struct pfn
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:55:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231204155554.GG1493156@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR12MB3763A85483534C7FD50529C8B086A@BY5PR12MB3763.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 03:54:52PM +0000, Ankit Agrawal wrote:
> >> It wasn't removed. patch 1 moved it to memory_failure() where it makes
> >> a lot more sense.
> >
> > Why is this a separate patch then?
>
> This was done to keep ghes code separate from the memory failure code.
> I can merge them if that is preferable.
A single patch to move just this code could be a good idea
Jason
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-04 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-23 0:35 [PATCH v2 0/4] mm: Implement ECC handling for pfn with no struct page ankita
2023-11-23 0:35 ` ankita
2023-11-23 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: handle poisoning of pfn without struct pages ankita
2023-11-23 0:35 ` ankita
2023-11-23 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: Add poison error check in fixup_user_fault() for mapped pfn ankita
2023-11-23 0:35 ` ankita
2023-12-01 17:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-12-01 17:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-23 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: Change ghes code to allow poison of non-struct pfn ankita
2023-11-23 0:35 ` ankita
2023-12-02 23:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-02 23:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-04 14:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-04 14:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-04 15:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-04 15:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-04 15:54 ` Ankit Agrawal
2023-12-04 15:54 ` Ankit Agrawal
2023-12-04 15:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-12-04 15:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-23 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] vfio/nvgpu: register device memory for poison handling ankita
2023-11-23 0:35 ` ankita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231204155554.GG1493156@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=anuaggarwal@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.