From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>,
Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>,
Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib: Add support bcachefs filesystem
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 18:55:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231207175538.GA248849@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXHXxCRa31xO-Lo_@rei>
> Hi!
> > bcachefs has been merged into v6.7-rc1 [1]. Let's add it's support to
> > LTP .all_filesystems = 1 and TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS=1.
> > [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/934692/
> > Suggested-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > ---
> > Hi,
> > this should be merged after v6.7 is released.
> Agreed, although it's unlikey that they will pull bcachefs off from the
> tree now. Any way I think that we should add the support to the next
> release.
Yep, now it's 6.7-rc4. I'll prepare v2
> > So far I haven't tested all LTP tests on bcachefs temporary directory.
> > I have only tested tests which use .all_filesystems = 1 or TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS=1.
> > So far it looks like there are only a few tests failing:
> > statvfs01.c:44: TFAIL: creat(valid_fname, 0444) failed: ENAMETOOLONG (36)
> That strange, that would mean that statvfs() reports possibly wrong
> f_namemax. Looking at the code the f_namemax is initialized to
> BCH_NAME_MAX in bch2_statfs().
> And the dirent_create_key() does:
> if (name->len > BCH_NAME_MAX)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG);
> That does not look like there is any room for a failure. Maybe we can
> print the buf.f_namemax value in the test and check if it's 512 since
> that is the value of BCH_NAME_MAX.
> > statx04.c:122: TFAIL: STATX_ATTR_COMPRESSED not supported
> This probably just needs:
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx04.c
> index 58296bd24..8d14cef8c 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx04.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx04.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ static void setup(void)
> expected_mask |= attr_list[i].attr;
> /* STATX_ATTR_COMPRESSED not supported on XFS, TMPFS */
> - if (!strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "xfs") || !strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "tmpfs"))
> + if (!strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "xfs") || !strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "tmpfs") ||
> + !strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "bcachefs")
> expected_mask &= ~STATX_ATTR_COMPRESSED;
Obviously skipping works. STATX_ATTR_COMPRESSED is not in fs/bcachefs/ directory in stat->attributes,
unlike on the other fs, so it looks like it's not supported.
> /* Attribute support was added to Btrfs statx() in kernel v4.13 */
> > fanotify13.c, fanotify15.c and fanotify16.c produce many errors.
> That is probably something for Jan Kara or Amir Goldstein.
Yep, I'll Cc them on v2 and ask for help.
Kind regards,
Petr
> > I haven't tested on machine with more NUMA nodes, thus
> > set_mempolicy03.c, set_mempolicy04.c has not been tested.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>,
ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] lib: Add support bcachefs filesystem
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 18:55:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231207175538.GA248849@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXHXxCRa31xO-Lo_@rei>
> Hi!
> > bcachefs has been merged into v6.7-rc1 [1]. Let's add it's support to
> > LTP .all_filesystems = 1 and TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS=1.
> > [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/934692/
> > Suggested-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > ---
> > Hi,
> > this should be merged after v6.7 is released.
> Agreed, although it's unlikey that they will pull bcachefs off from the
> tree now. Any way I think that we should add the support to the next
> release.
Yep, now it's 6.7-rc4. I'll prepare v2
> > So far I haven't tested all LTP tests on bcachefs temporary directory.
> > I have only tested tests which use .all_filesystems = 1 or TST_ALL_FILESYSTEMS=1.
> > So far it looks like there are only a few tests failing:
> > statvfs01.c:44: TFAIL: creat(valid_fname, 0444) failed: ENAMETOOLONG (36)
> That strange, that would mean that statvfs() reports possibly wrong
> f_namemax. Looking at the code the f_namemax is initialized to
> BCH_NAME_MAX in bch2_statfs().
> And the dirent_create_key() does:
> if (name->len > BCH_NAME_MAX)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG);
> That does not look like there is any room for a failure. Maybe we can
> print the buf.f_namemax value in the test and check if it's 512 since
> that is the value of BCH_NAME_MAX.
> > statx04.c:122: TFAIL: STATX_ATTR_COMPRESSED not supported
> This probably just needs:
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx04.c
> index 58296bd24..8d14cef8c 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx04.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx04.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ static void setup(void)
> expected_mask |= attr_list[i].attr;
> /* STATX_ATTR_COMPRESSED not supported on XFS, TMPFS */
> - if (!strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "xfs") || !strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "tmpfs"))
> + if (!strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "xfs") || !strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "tmpfs") ||
> + !strcmp(tst_device->fs_type, "bcachefs")
> expected_mask &= ~STATX_ATTR_COMPRESSED;
Obviously skipping works. STATX_ATTR_COMPRESSED is not in fs/bcachefs/ directory in stat->attributes,
unlike on the other fs, so it looks like it's not supported.
> /* Attribute support was added to Btrfs statx() in kernel v4.13 */
> > fanotify13.c, fanotify15.c and fanotify16.c produce many errors.
> That is probably something for Jan Kara or Amir Goldstein.
Yep, I'll Cc them on v2 and ask for help.
Kind regards,
Petr
> > I haven't tested on machine with more NUMA nodes, thus
> > set_mempolicy03.c, set_mempolicy04.c has not been tested.
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-16 13:55 [PATCH 1/1] lib: Add support bcachefs filesystem Petr Vorel
2023-11-16 13:55 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-12-07 14:33 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-12-07 14:33 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2023-12-07 17:55 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2023-12-07 17:55 ` Petr Vorel
2024-05-07 17:10 ` Petr Vorel
2024-05-07 17:10 ` Petr Vorel
2023-12-07 19:22 ` Petr Vorel
2023-12-07 19:22 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231207175538.GA248849@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
--cc=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
--cc=yangx.jy@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.