All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	hawk@kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org,
	linyunsheng@huawei.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jasowang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/4] page_pool: transition to reference count management after page draining
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 17:38:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231208173816.2f32ad0f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231206105419.27952-2-liangchen.linux@gmail.com>

On Wed,  6 Dec 2023 18:54:16 +0800 Liang Chen wrote:
> -/* pp_frag_count represents the number of writers who can update the page
> +/* pp_ref_count represents the number of writers who can update the page
>   * either by updating skb->data or via DMA mappings for the device.
>   * We can't rely on the page refcnt for that as we don't know who might be
>   * holding page references and we can't reliably destroy or sync DMA mappings
>   * of the fragments.
>   *
> - * When pp_frag_count reaches 0 we can either recycle the page if the page
> + * pp_ref_count initially corresponds to the number of fragments. However,
> + * when multiple users start to reference a single fragment, for example in
> + * skb_try_coalesce, the pp_ref_count will become greater than the number of
> + * fragments.
> + *
> + * When pp_ref_count reaches 0 we can either recycle the page if the page
>   * refcnt is 1 or return it back to the memory allocator and destroy any
>   * mappings we have.
>   */

Sorry to nit pick but I think this whole doc has to be rewritten
completely. It does state the most important thing which is that
the caller must have just allocated the page.

How about:

/**
 * page_pool_fragment_page() - split a fresh page into fragments
 * @.. fill these in
 *
 * pp_ref_count represents the number of outstanding references
 * to the page, which will be freed using page_pool APIs (rather
 * than page allocator APIs like put_page()). Such references are
 * usually held by page_pool-aware objects like skbs marked for
 * page pool recycling.
 *
 * This helper allows the caller to take (set) multiple references
 * to a freshly allocated page. The page must be freshly allocated
 * (have a pp_ref_count of 1). This is commonly done by drivers
 * and "fragment allocators" to save atomic operations - either
 * when they know upfront how many references they will need; or
 * to take MAX references and return the unused ones with a single
 * atomic dec(), instead of performing multiple atomic inc()
 * operations.
 */

I think that's more informative at this stage of evolution of
the  page pool API, when most users aren't experts on internals.
But feel free to disagree..

>  static inline void page_pool_fragment_page(struct page *page, long nr)
>  {
> -	atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, nr);
> +	atomic_long_set(&page->pp_ref_count, nr);
>  }

The code itself and rest of the patches LGTM, although it would be
great to get ACKs from pp maintainers..


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-09  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-06 10:54 [PATCH net-next v7 0/4] skbuff: Optimize SKB coalescing for page pool Liang Chen
2023-12-06 10:54 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/4] page_pool: transition to reference count management after page draining Liang Chen
2023-12-09  1:38   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-12-11  3:31     ` Liang Chen
2023-12-06 10:54 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/4] page_pool: halve BIAS_MAX for multiple user references of a fragment Liang Chen
2023-12-06 10:54 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/4] skbuff: Add a function to check if a page belongs to page_pool Liang Chen
2023-12-06 10:54 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/4] skbuff: Optimization of SKB coalescing for page pool Liang Chen
2023-12-09  2:18   ` Mina Almasry
2023-12-11  3:38     ` Liang Chen
2023-12-11  4:21       ` Mina Almasry
2023-12-11 19:32         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-12-11 20:07           ` Mina Almasry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231208173816.2f32ad0f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.