From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: alter feature support check for SRIOV and LAG
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:07:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231215120705.GI6288@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231211211928.2261079-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com>
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:19:28PM -0800, Dave Ertman wrote:
> Previously, the ice driver had support for using a hanldler for bonding
> netdev events to ensure that conflicting features were not allowed to be
> activated at the same time. While this was still in place, additional
> support was added to specifically support SRIOV and LAG together. These
> both utilized the netdev event handler, but the SRIOV and LAG feature was
> behind a capabilities feature check to make sure the current NVM has
> support.
>
> The exclusion part of the event handler should be removed since there are
> users who have custom made solutions that depend on the non-exclusion of
> features.
>
> Wrap the creation/registration and cleanup of the event handler and
> associated structs in the probe flow with a feature check so that the
> only systems that support the full implementation of LAG features will
> initialize support. This will leave other systems unhindered with
> functionality as it existed before any LAG code was added.
>
> Fixes: bb52f42acef6 ("ice: Add driver support for firmware changes for LAG")
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
Hi Dave,
I'm interpreting this as fixing a regression of an existing feature.
In that context:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: alter feature support check for SRIOV and LAG
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:07:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231215120705.GI6288@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231211211928.2261079-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com>
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:19:28PM -0800, Dave Ertman wrote:
> Previously, the ice driver had support for using a hanldler for bonding
> netdev events to ensure that conflicting features were not allowed to be
> activated at the same time. While this was still in place, additional
> support was added to specifically support SRIOV and LAG together. These
> both utilized the netdev event handler, but the SRIOV and LAG feature was
> behind a capabilities feature check to make sure the current NVM has
> support.
>
> The exclusion part of the event handler should be removed since there are
> users who have custom made solutions that depend on the non-exclusion of
> features.
>
> Wrap the creation/registration and cleanup of the event handler and
> associated structs in the probe flow with a feature check so that the
> only systems that support the full implementation of LAG features will
> initialize support. This will leave other systems unhindered with
> functionality as it existed before any LAG code was added.
>
> Fixes: bb52f42acef6 ("ice: Add driver support for firmware changes for LAG")
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
Hi Dave,
I'm interpreting this as fixing a regression of an existing feature.
In that context:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-15 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-11 21:19 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: alter feature support check for SRIOV and LAG Dave Ertman
2023-12-11 21:19 ` Dave Ertman
2023-12-15 12:07 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-12-15 12:07 ` Simon Horman
2023-12-18 5:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
2023-12-18 5:50 ` Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231215120705.GI6288@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.