From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Michael Walle" <michael@walle.cc>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: [PATCH v6.8 2/2] nvmem: drop nvmem_layout_get_match_data()
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 13:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231219120104.3422-2-zajec5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231219120104.3422-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Thanks for layouts refactoring we now have "struct device" associated
with layout. Also its OF pointer points directly to the "nvmem-layout"
DT node.
All it takes to get match data is a generic of_device_get_match_data().
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 13 -------------
include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 10 ----------
2 files changed, 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 441d132ebb61..4ed54076346d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -876,19 +876,6 @@ void nvmem_layout_unregister(struct nvmem_layout *layout)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_layout_unregister);
-const void *nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout)
-{
- struct device_node __maybe_unused *layout_np;
- const struct of_device_id *match;
-
- layout_np = of_nvmem_layout_get_container(nvmem);
- match = of_match_node(layout->dev.driver->of_match_table, layout_np);
-
- return match ? match->data : NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_layout_get_match_data);
-
/**
* nvmem_register() - Register a nvmem device for given nvmem_config.
* Also creates a binary entry in /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/dev-name/nvmem
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index 81a67642ac55..f0ba0e03218f 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -205,9 +205,6 @@ void nvmem_layout_driver_unregister(struct nvmem_layout_driver *drv);
module_driver(__nvmem_layout_driver, nvmem_layout_driver_register, \
nvmem_layout_driver_unregister)
-const void *nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout);
-
#else
static inline struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *c)
@@ -238,13 +235,6 @@ static inline int nvmem_layout_register(struct nvmem_layout *layout)
static inline void nvmem_layout_unregister(struct nvmem_layout *layout) {}
-static inline const void *
-nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
#endif /* CONFIG_NVMEM */
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVMEM) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
--
2.35.3
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Michael Walle" <michael@walle.cc>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: [PATCH v6.8 2/2] nvmem: drop nvmem_layout_get_match_data()
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 13:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231219120104.3422-2-zajec5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231219120104.3422-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Thanks for layouts refactoring we now have "struct device" associated
with layout. Also its OF pointer points directly to the "nvmem-layout"
DT node.
All it takes to get match data is a generic of_device_get_match_data().
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 13 -------------
include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 10 ----------
2 files changed, 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 441d132ebb61..4ed54076346d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -876,19 +876,6 @@ void nvmem_layout_unregister(struct nvmem_layout *layout)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_layout_unregister);
-const void *nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout)
-{
- struct device_node __maybe_unused *layout_np;
- const struct of_device_id *match;
-
- layout_np = of_nvmem_layout_get_container(nvmem);
- match = of_match_node(layout->dev.driver->of_match_table, layout_np);
-
- return match ? match->data : NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_layout_get_match_data);
-
/**
* nvmem_register() - Register a nvmem device for given nvmem_config.
* Also creates a binary entry in /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/dev-name/nvmem
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index 81a67642ac55..f0ba0e03218f 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -205,9 +205,6 @@ void nvmem_layout_driver_unregister(struct nvmem_layout_driver *drv);
module_driver(__nvmem_layout_driver, nvmem_layout_driver_register, \
nvmem_layout_driver_unregister)
-const void *nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout);
-
#else
static inline struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *c)
@@ -238,13 +235,6 @@ static inline int nvmem_layout_register(struct nvmem_layout *layout)
static inline void nvmem_layout_unregister(struct nvmem_layout *layout) {}
-static inline const void *
-nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
#endif /* CONFIG_NVMEM */
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVMEM) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
--
2.35.3
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Michael Walle" <michael@walle.cc>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: [PATCH v6.8 2/2] nvmem: drop nvmem_layout_get_match_data()
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 13:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231219120104.3422-2-zajec5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231219120104.3422-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Thanks for layouts refactoring we now have "struct device" associated
with layout. Also its OF pointer points directly to the "nvmem-layout"
DT node.
All it takes to get match data is a generic of_device_get_match_data().
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 13 -------------
include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 10 ----------
2 files changed, 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 441d132ebb61..4ed54076346d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -876,19 +876,6 @@ void nvmem_layout_unregister(struct nvmem_layout *layout)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_layout_unregister);
-const void *nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout)
-{
- struct device_node __maybe_unused *layout_np;
- const struct of_device_id *match;
-
- layout_np = of_nvmem_layout_get_container(nvmem);
- match = of_match_node(layout->dev.driver->of_match_table, layout_np);
-
- return match ? match->data : NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_layout_get_match_data);
-
/**
* nvmem_register() - Register a nvmem device for given nvmem_config.
* Also creates a binary entry in /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/dev-name/nvmem
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index 81a67642ac55..f0ba0e03218f 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -205,9 +205,6 @@ void nvmem_layout_driver_unregister(struct nvmem_layout_driver *drv);
module_driver(__nvmem_layout_driver, nvmem_layout_driver_register, \
nvmem_layout_driver_unregister)
-const void *nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout);
-
#else
static inline struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *c)
@@ -238,13 +235,6 @@ static inline int nvmem_layout_register(struct nvmem_layout *layout)
static inline void nvmem_layout_unregister(struct nvmem_layout *layout) {}
-static inline const void *
-nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
#endif /* CONFIG_NVMEM */
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVMEM) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
--
2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-19 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-19 12:01 [PATCH v6.8 1/2] nvmem: layouts: refactor .add_cells() callback arguments Rafał Miłecki
2023-12-19 12:01 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-12-19 12:01 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-12-19 12:01 ` Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2023-12-19 12:01 ` [PATCH v6.8 2/2] nvmem: drop nvmem_layout_get_match_data() Rafał Miłecki
2023-12-19 12:01 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-12-19 12:21 ` Michael Walle
2023-12-19 12:21 ` Michael Walle
2023-12-19 12:21 ` Michael Walle
2023-12-19 12:33 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-12-19 12:33 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-12-19 12:33 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-12-19 12:56 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-12-19 12:56 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-12-19 12:56 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-12-19 12:24 ` [PATCH v6.8 1/2] nvmem: layouts: refactor .add_cells() callback arguments Michael Walle
2023-12-19 12:24 ` Michael Walle
2023-12-19 12:24 ` Michael Walle
2023-12-19 12:55 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-12-19 12:55 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-12-19 12:55 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231219120104.3422-2-zajec5@gmail.com \
--to=zajec5@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.