All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: lkp@intel.com, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten@lankhorst.se>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	oliver.sang@intel.com, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev,
	"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:18:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231219160524.3646-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#__lock_acquire" on:

commit: 4f37585fa02f3eaebc72efa1260e6742478c00fa ("[PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Thomas-Hellstr-m/locking-ww_mutex-Adjust-to-lockdep-nest_lock-requirements/20231220-000906
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git a51749ab34d9e5dec548fe38ede7e01e8bb26454
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231219160524.3646-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com/
patch subject: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements

in testcase: boot

compiler: gcc-7
test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)


+-----------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
|                                                     | a51749ab34 | 4f37585fa0 |
+-----------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
| WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#__lock_acquire | 0          | 6          |
| EIP:__lock_acquire                                  | 0          | 6          |
+-----------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+


If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com


[    9.777113][   T10] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    9.777784][   T10] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock->references < references)
[ 9.777795][ T10] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[    9.778839][   T10] Modules linked in:
[    9.778839][   T10] CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1-00006-g4f37585fa02f #5
[    9.778839][   T10] Workqueue: test-ww_mutex stress_inorder_work
[ 9.778839][ T10] EIP: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] Code: e8 ae 10 2e 00 85 c0 0f 84 0e 0f 00 00 8b 1d 94 9c b5 ce 85 db 0f 85 00 0f 00 00 68 64 16 34 ce 68 fe 17 33 ce e8 09 22 fc ff <0f> 0b 58 5a e9 28 12 00 00 a1 90 ef 24 cf 85 c0 74 07 eb 2a 8d 74
All code
========
   0:	e8 ae 10 2e 00       	callq  0x2e10b3
   5:	85 c0                	test   %eax,%eax
   7:	0f 84 0e 0f 00 00    	je     0xf1b
   d:	8b 1d 94 9c b5 ce    	mov    -0x314a636c(%rip),%ebx        # 0xffffffffceb59ca7
  13:	85 db                	test   %ebx,%ebx
  15:	0f 85 00 0f 00 00    	jne    0xf1b
  1b:	68 64 16 34 ce       	pushq  $0xffffffffce341664
  20:	68 fe 17 33 ce       	pushq  $0xffffffffce3317fe
  25:	e8 09 22 fc ff       	callq  0xfffffffffffc2233
  2a:*	0f 0b                	ud2    		<-- trapping instruction
  2c:	58                   	pop    %rax
  2d:	5a                   	pop    %rdx
  2e:	e9 28 12 00 00       	jmpq   0x125b
  33:	a1 90 ef 24 cf 85 c0 	movabs 0x774c085cf24ef90,%eax
  3a:	74 07 
  3c:	eb 2a                	jmp    0x68
  3e:	8d                   	.byte 0x8d
  3f:	74                   	.byte 0x74

Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
   0:	0f 0b                	ud2    
   2:	58                   	pop    %rax
   3:	5a                   	pop    %rdx
   4:	e9 28 12 00 00       	jmpq   0x1231
   9:	a1 90 ef 24 cf 85 c0 	movabs 0x774c085cf24ef90,%eax
  10:	74 07 
  12:	eb 2a                	jmp    0x3e
  14:	8d                   	.byte 0x8d
  15:	74                   	.byte 0x74
[    9.778839][   T10] EAX: 00000033 EBX: 00000000 ECX: c0245cb4 EDX: ce9da1ac
[    9.778839][   T10] ESI: c26cb37c EDI: c02569ac EBP: c0245db0 ESP: c0245d60
[    9.778839][   T10] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010002
[    9.778839][   T10] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ffdda000 CR3: 0ec21000 CR4: 00040690
[    9.778839][   T10] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[    9.778839][   T10] DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[    9.778839][   T10] Call Trace:
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:478) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:677) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:201 lib/bug.c:219) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:237) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:258 (discriminator 1)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? handle_exception (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:1056) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5047) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c:91) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5755) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? stress_inorder_work (kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c:457) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? lock_is_held_type (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5494 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5824) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] __ww_mutex_lock+0xb1/0xd84 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? stress_inorder_work (kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c:457) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ww_mutex_lock (kernel/locking/mutex.c:878) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] stress_inorder_work (kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c:457) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] process_scheduled_works (kernel/workqueue.c:2630 include/linux/jump_label.h:207 include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2635 kernel/workqueue.c:2703) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] worker_thread (include/linux/list.h:373 kernel/workqueue.c:841 kernel/workqueue.c:2785) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:390) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? rescuer_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:2730) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:741) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] entry_INT80_32 (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:947) 
[    9.778839][   T10] irq event stamp: 14037
[ 9.778839][ T10] hardirqs last enabled at (14037): irqentry_exit (kernel/entry/common.c:435) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] hardirqs last disabled at (14036): common_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] softirqs last enabled at (8978): __do_softirq (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:27 kernel/softirq.c:400 kernel/softirq.c:582) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] softirqs last disabled at (8969): do_softirq_own_stack (arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:57 arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:147) 
[    9.778839][   T10] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    9.917906][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.273181][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.621916][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.788923][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.919665][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 26 jiffies.
[   11.085916][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   11.471931][   T35] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   11.784602][    T1] All ww mutex selftests passed



The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231222/202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com



-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten@lankhorst.se>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, oliver.sang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:18:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231219160524.3646-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#__lock_acquire" on:

commit: 4f37585fa02f3eaebc72efa1260e6742478c00fa ("[PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Thomas-Hellstr-m/locking-ww_mutex-Adjust-to-lockdep-nest_lock-requirements/20231220-000906
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git a51749ab34d9e5dec548fe38ede7e01e8bb26454
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231219160524.3646-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com/
patch subject: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements

in testcase: boot

compiler: gcc-7
test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)


+-----------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
|                                                     | a51749ab34 | 4f37585fa0 |
+-----------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
| WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#__lock_acquire | 0          | 6          |
| EIP:__lock_acquire                                  | 0          | 6          |
+-----------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+


If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com


[    9.777113][   T10] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    9.777784][   T10] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock->references < references)
[ 9.777795][ T10] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[    9.778839][   T10] Modules linked in:
[    9.778839][   T10] CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1-00006-g4f37585fa02f #5
[    9.778839][   T10] Workqueue: test-ww_mutex stress_inorder_work
[ 9.778839][ T10] EIP: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] Code: e8 ae 10 2e 00 85 c0 0f 84 0e 0f 00 00 8b 1d 94 9c b5 ce 85 db 0f 85 00 0f 00 00 68 64 16 34 ce 68 fe 17 33 ce e8 09 22 fc ff <0f> 0b 58 5a e9 28 12 00 00 a1 90 ef 24 cf 85 c0 74 07 eb 2a 8d 74
All code
========
   0:	e8 ae 10 2e 00       	callq  0x2e10b3
   5:	85 c0                	test   %eax,%eax
   7:	0f 84 0e 0f 00 00    	je     0xf1b
   d:	8b 1d 94 9c b5 ce    	mov    -0x314a636c(%rip),%ebx        # 0xffffffffceb59ca7
  13:	85 db                	test   %ebx,%ebx
  15:	0f 85 00 0f 00 00    	jne    0xf1b
  1b:	68 64 16 34 ce       	pushq  $0xffffffffce341664
  20:	68 fe 17 33 ce       	pushq  $0xffffffffce3317fe
  25:	e8 09 22 fc ff       	callq  0xfffffffffffc2233
  2a:*	0f 0b                	ud2    		<-- trapping instruction
  2c:	58                   	pop    %rax
  2d:	5a                   	pop    %rdx
  2e:	e9 28 12 00 00       	jmpq   0x125b
  33:	a1 90 ef 24 cf 85 c0 	movabs 0x774c085cf24ef90,%eax
  3a:	74 07 
  3c:	eb 2a                	jmp    0x68
  3e:	8d                   	.byte 0x8d
  3f:	74                   	.byte 0x74

Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
   0:	0f 0b                	ud2    
   2:	58                   	pop    %rax
   3:	5a                   	pop    %rdx
   4:	e9 28 12 00 00       	jmpq   0x1231
   9:	a1 90 ef 24 cf 85 c0 	movabs 0x774c085cf24ef90,%eax
  10:	74 07 
  12:	eb 2a                	jmp    0x3e
  14:	8d                   	.byte 0x8d
  15:	74                   	.byte 0x74
[    9.778839][   T10] EAX: 00000033 EBX: 00000000 ECX: c0245cb4 EDX: ce9da1ac
[    9.778839][   T10] ESI: c26cb37c EDI: c02569ac EBP: c0245db0 ESP: c0245d60
[    9.778839][   T10] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010002
[    9.778839][   T10] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ffdda000 CR3: 0ec21000 CR4: 00040690
[    9.778839][   T10] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[    9.778839][   T10] DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[    9.778839][   T10] Call Trace:
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:478) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:677) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:201 lib/bug.c:219) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:237) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:258 (discriminator 1)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? handle_exception (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:1056) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5047) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c:91) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5755) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? stress_inorder_work (kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c:457) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? lock_is_held_type (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5494 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5824) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] __ww_mutex_lock+0xb1/0xd84 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? stress_inorder_work (kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c:457) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ww_mutex_lock (kernel/locking/mutex.c:878) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] stress_inorder_work (kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c:457) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] process_scheduled_works (kernel/workqueue.c:2630 include/linux/jump_label.h:207 include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2635 kernel/workqueue.c:2703) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] worker_thread (include/linux/list.h:373 kernel/workqueue.c:841 kernel/workqueue.c:2785) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:390) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? rescuer_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:2730) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:741) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] entry_INT80_32 (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:947) 
[    9.778839][   T10] irq event stamp: 14037
[ 9.778839][ T10] hardirqs last enabled at (14037): irqentry_exit (kernel/entry/common.c:435) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] hardirqs last disabled at (14036): common_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] softirqs last enabled at (8978): __do_softirq (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:27 kernel/softirq.c:400 kernel/softirq.c:582) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] softirqs last disabled at (8969): do_softirq_own_stack (arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:57 arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:147) 
[    9.778839][   T10] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    9.917906][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.273181][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.621916][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.788923][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.919665][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 26 jiffies.
[   11.085916][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   11.471931][   T35] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   11.784602][    T1] All ww mutex selftests passed



The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231222/202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com



-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	lkp@intel.com, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten@lankhorst.se>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	oliver.sang@intel.com, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev,
	"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:18:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231219160524.3646-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#__lock_acquire" on:

commit: 4f37585fa02f3eaebc72efa1260e6742478c00fa ("[PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Thomas-Hellstr-m/locking-ww_mutex-Adjust-to-lockdep-nest_lock-requirements/20231220-000906
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git a51749ab34d9e5dec548fe38ede7e01e8bb26454
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231219160524.3646-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com/
patch subject: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements

in testcase: boot

compiler: gcc-7
test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)


+-----------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
|                                                     | a51749ab34 | 4f37585fa0 |
+-----------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
| WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#__lock_acquire | 0          | 6          |
| EIP:__lock_acquire                                  | 0          | 6          |
+-----------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+


If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com


[    9.777113][   T10] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    9.777784][   T10] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock->references < references)
[ 9.777795][ T10] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[    9.778839][   T10] Modules linked in:
[    9.778839][   T10] CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1-00006-g4f37585fa02f #5
[    9.778839][   T10] Workqueue: test-ww_mutex stress_inorder_work
[ 9.778839][ T10] EIP: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] Code: e8 ae 10 2e 00 85 c0 0f 84 0e 0f 00 00 8b 1d 94 9c b5 ce 85 db 0f 85 00 0f 00 00 68 64 16 34 ce 68 fe 17 33 ce e8 09 22 fc ff <0f> 0b 58 5a e9 28 12 00 00 a1 90 ef 24 cf 85 c0 74 07 eb 2a 8d 74
All code
========
   0:	e8 ae 10 2e 00       	callq  0x2e10b3
   5:	85 c0                	test   %eax,%eax
   7:	0f 84 0e 0f 00 00    	je     0xf1b
   d:	8b 1d 94 9c b5 ce    	mov    -0x314a636c(%rip),%ebx        # 0xffffffffceb59ca7
  13:	85 db                	test   %ebx,%ebx
  15:	0f 85 00 0f 00 00    	jne    0xf1b
  1b:	68 64 16 34 ce       	pushq  $0xffffffffce341664
  20:	68 fe 17 33 ce       	pushq  $0xffffffffce3317fe
  25:	e8 09 22 fc ff       	callq  0xfffffffffffc2233
  2a:*	0f 0b                	ud2    		<-- trapping instruction
  2c:	58                   	pop    %rax
  2d:	5a                   	pop    %rdx
  2e:	e9 28 12 00 00       	jmpq   0x125b
  33:	a1 90 ef 24 cf 85 c0 	movabs 0x774c085cf24ef90,%eax
  3a:	74 07 
  3c:	eb 2a                	jmp    0x68
  3e:	8d                   	.byte 0x8d
  3f:	74                   	.byte 0x74

Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
   0:	0f 0b                	ud2    
   2:	58                   	pop    %rax
   3:	5a                   	pop    %rdx
   4:	e9 28 12 00 00       	jmpq   0x1231
   9:	a1 90 ef 24 cf 85 c0 	movabs 0x774c085cf24ef90,%eax
  10:	74 07 
  12:	eb 2a                	jmp    0x3e
  14:	8d                   	.byte 0x8d
  15:	74                   	.byte 0x74
[    9.778839][   T10] EAX: 00000033 EBX: 00000000 ECX: c0245cb4 EDX: ce9da1ac
[    9.778839][   T10] ESI: c26cb37c EDI: c02569ac EBP: c0245db0 ESP: c0245d60
[    9.778839][   T10] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010002
[    9.778839][   T10] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ffdda000 CR3: 0ec21000 CR4: 00040690
[    9.778839][   T10] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[    9.778839][   T10] DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[    9.778839][   T10] Call Trace:
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:478) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:677) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:201 lib/bug.c:219) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:237) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:258 (discriminator 1)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? handle_exception (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:1056) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5047) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055 (discriminator 9)) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c:91) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5755) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? stress_inorder_work (kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c:457) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? lock_is_held_type (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5494 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5824) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] __ww_mutex_lock+0xb1/0xd84 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? stress_inorder_work (kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c:457) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ww_mutex_lock (kernel/locking/mutex.c:878) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] stress_inorder_work (kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c:457) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] process_scheduled_works (kernel/workqueue.c:2630 include/linux/jump_label.h:207 include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2635 kernel/workqueue.c:2703) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] worker_thread (include/linux/list.h:373 kernel/workqueue.c:841 kernel/workqueue.c:2785) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:390) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? rescuer_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:2730) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:341) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:741) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] entry_INT80_32 (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:947) 
[    9.778839][   T10] irq event stamp: 14037
[ 9.778839][ T10] hardirqs last enabled at (14037): irqentry_exit (kernel/entry/common.c:435) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] hardirqs last disabled at (14036): common_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] softirqs last enabled at (8978): __do_softirq (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:27 kernel/softirq.c:400 kernel/softirq.c:582) 
[ 9.778839][ T10] softirqs last disabled at (8969): do_softirq_own_stack (arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:57 arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:147) 
[    9.778839][   T10] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    9.917906][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.273181][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.621916][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.788923][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   10.919665][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 26 jiffies.
[   11.085916][   T36] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   11.471931][   T35] torture_spin_lock_write_delay: delay = 25 jiffies.
[   11.784602][    T1] All ww mutex selftests passed



The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231222/202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com



-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-22  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-19 16:05 [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements Thomas Hellström
2023-12-19 16:05 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-12-19 16:05 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-12-19 16:08 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements (rev2) Patchwork
2023-12-19 16:08 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2023-12-19 16:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-12-19 16:16 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-12-19 16:17 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-12-19 16:18 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2023-12-19 16:54 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-12-22  9:18 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-12-22  9:18   ` [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements kernel test robot
2023-12-22  9:18   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202312221708.b143534-oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=maarten@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.