Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 4/4] syscalls: splice07: New splice tst_fd iterator test

[Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>]

Hi Cyril,

...
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/splice/splice07.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> + *
nit: missing a description.
> + */
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +
> +#include <sys/socket.h>
> +#include <netinet/in.h>
> +
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +void check_splice(struct tst_fd *fd_in, struct tst_fd *fd_out)
nit: missing static

> +	/* These produce EBADF instead of EINVAL */
> +	switch (fd_out->type) {
> +	case TST_FD_DIR:
> +	case TST_FD_DEV_ZERO:
> +	case TST_FD_PROC_MAPS:
> +	case TST_FD_INOTIFY:
> +	case TST_FD_PIPE_READ:
> +		exp_errno = EBADF;
I tested it just on kernel 6.6. I wonder if this behaves the same on older
kernels.

> +	default:
> +	break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (fd_in->type == TST_FD_PIPE_WRITE)
> +		exp_errno = EBADF;
> +
> +	if (fd_in->type == TST_FD_OPEN_TREE || fd_out->type == TST_FD_OPEN_TREE ||
> +	    fd_in->type == TST_FD_PATH || fd_out->type == TST_FD_PATH)
> +		exp_errno = EBADF;
I suppose you'll send another version, which will make use of TST_EXP_FAIL.
https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20240103115700.14585-1-chrubis@suse.cz/

BTW I also wonder if TST_EXP_FAIL() could simplify some of fanotify tests
(some of them got quite complex over time).

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp