From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: entry: fix ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:02:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240116110221.420467-2-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116110221.420467-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Currently the ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD workaround isn't
quite right, as it is supposed to be applied after the last explicit
memory access, but is immediately followed by an LDR.
The ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD workaround is used to
handle Cortex-A520 erratum 2966298 and Cortex-A510 erratum 3117295,
which are described in:
* https://developer.arm.com/documentation/SDEN2444153/0600/?lang=en
* https://developer.arm.com/documentation/SDEN1873361/1600/?lang=en
In both cases the workaround is described as:
| If pagetable isolation is disabled, the context switch logic in the
| kernel can be updated to execute the following sequence on affected
| cores before exiting to EL0, and after all explicit memory accesses:
|
| 1. A non-shareable TLBI to any context and/or address, including
| unused contexts or addresses, such as a `TLBI VALE1 Xzr`.
|
| 2. A DSB NSH to guarantee completion of the TLBI.
The important part being that the TLBI+DSB must be placed "after all
explicit memory accesses".
Unfortunately, as-implemented, the TLBI+DSB is immediately followed by
an LDR, as we have:
| alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
| tlbi vale1, xzr
| dsb nsh
| alternative_else_nop_endif
| alternative_if_not ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
| ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
| add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
| eret
| alternative_else_nop_endif
|
| [ ... KPTI exception return path ... ]
This patch fixes this by reworking the logic to place the TLBI+DSB
immediately before the ERET, after all explicit memory accesses.
The ERET is currently in a separate alternative block, and alternatives
cannot be nested. To account for this, the alternative block for
ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 is replaced with a single alternative branch
to skip the KPTI logic, with the new shape of the logic being:
| alternative_insn "b .L_skip_tramp_exit_\@", nop, ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
| [ ... KPTI exception return path ... ]
| .L_skip_tramp_exit_\@:
|
| ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
| add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
|
| alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
| tlbi vale1, xzr
| dsb nsh
| alternative_else_nop_endif
| eret
The new structure means that the workaround is only applied when KPTI is
not in use; this is fine as noted in the documented implications of the
erratum:
| Pagetable isolation between EL0 and higher level ELs prevents the
| issue from occurring.
... and as per the workaround description quoted above, the workaround
is only necessary "If pagetable isolation is disabled".
Fixes: 471470bc7052d28c ("arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A520 speculative unprivileged load workaround")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 544ab46649f3f..7fcbee0f6c0e4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -428,16 +428,9 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
ldp x28, x29, [sp, #16 * 14]
.if \el == 0
-alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
- tlbi vale1, xzr
- dsb nsh
-alternative_else_nop_endif
-alternative_if_not ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
- ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
- add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
- eret
-alternative_else_nop_endif
#ifdef CONFIG_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
+ alternative_insn "b .L_skip_tramp_exit_\@", nop, ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
+
msr far_el1, x29
ldr_this_cpu x30, this_cpu_vector, x29
@@ -446,7 +439,18 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR] // restore x30
add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
br x29
+
+.L_skip_tramp_exit_\@:
#endif
+ ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
+ add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
+
+ /* This must be after the last explicit memory access */
+alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
+ tlbi vale1, xzr
+ dsb nsh
+alternative_else_nop_endif
+ eret
.else
ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
--
2.30.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: entry: fix ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:02:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240116110221.420467-2-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116110221.420467-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Currently the ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD workaround isn't
quite right, as it is supposed to be applied after the last explicit
memory access, but is immediately followed by an LDR.
The ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD workaround is used to
handle Cortex-A520 erratum 2966298 and Cortex-A510 erratum 3117295,
which are described in:
* https://developer.arm.com/documentation/SDEN2444153/0600/?lang=en
* https://developer.arm.com/documentation/SDEN1873361/1600/?lang=en
In both cases the workaround is described as:
| If pagetable isolation is disabled, the context switch logic in the
| kernel can be updated to execute the following sequence on affected
| cores before exiting to EL0, and after all explicit memory accesses:
|
| 1. A non-shareable TLBI to any context and/or address, including
| unused contexts or addresses, such as a `TLBI VALE1 Xzr`.
|
| 2. A DSB NSH to guarantee completion of the TLBI.
The important part being that the TLBI+DSB must be placed "after all
explicit memory accesses".
Unfortunately, as-implemented, the TLBI+DSB is immediately followed by
an LDR, as we have:
| alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
| tlbi vale1, xzr
| dsb nsh
| alternative_else_nop_endif
| alternative_if_not ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
| ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
| add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
| eret
| alternative_else_nop_endif
|
| [ ... KPTI exception return path ... ]
This patch fixes this by reworking the logic to place the TLBI+DSB
immediately before the ERET, after all explicit memory accesses.
The ERET is currently in a separate alternative block, and alternatives
cannot be nested. To account for this, the alternative block for
ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 is replaced with a single alternative branch
to skip the KPTI logic, with the new shape of the logic being:
| alternative_insn "b .L_skip_tramp_exit_\@", nop, ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
| [ ... KPTI exception return path ... ]
| .L_skip_tramp_exit_\@:
|
| ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
| add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
|
| alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
| tlbi vale1, xzr
| dsb nsh
| alternative_else_nop_endif
| eret
The new structure means that the workaround is only applied when KPTI is
not in use; this is fine as noted in the documented implications of the
erratum:
| Pagetable isolation between EL0 and higher level ELs prevents the
| issue from occurring.
... and as per the workaround description quoted above, the workaround
is only necessary "If pagetable isolation is disabled".
Fixes: 471470bc7052d28c ("arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A520 speculative unprivileged load workaround")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 544ab46649f3f..7fcbee0f6c0e4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -428,16 +428,9 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
ldp x28, x29, [sp, #16 * 14]
.if \el == 0
-alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
- tlbi vale1, xzr
- dsb nsh
-alternative_else_nop_endif
-alternative_if_not ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
- ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
- add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
- eret
-alternative_else_nop_endif
#ifdef CONFIG_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
+ alternative_insn "b .L_skip_tramp_exit_\@", nop, ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
+
msr far_el1, x29
ldr_this_cpu x30, this_cpu_vector, x29
@@ -446,7 +439,18 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR] // restore x30
add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
br x29
+
+.L_skip_tramp_exit_\@:
#endif
+ ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
+ add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
+
+ /* This must be after the last explicit memory access */
+alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
+ tlbi vale1, xzr
+ dsb nsh
+alternative_else_nop_endif
+ eret
.else
ldr lr, [sp, #S_LR]
add sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE // restore sp
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 11:02 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: fix+cleanup for ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD Mark Rutland
2024-01-16 11:02 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-16 11:02 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-01-16 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: entry: fix ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD Mark Rutland
2024-01-19 15:11 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-19 15:11 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-22 11:16 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-22 11:16 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-16 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: entry: simplify kernel_exit logic Mark Rutland
2024-01-16 11:02 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-18 12:02 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm64: fix+cleanup for ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD Will Deacon
2024-01-18 12:02 ` Will Deacon
2024-01-19 10:32 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-19 10:32 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240116110221.420467-2-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.