From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Qiang Ma <maqianga@uniontech.com>
Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: ethtool: Fixed calltrace caused by unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:52:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240116155237.GA588419@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8553142D466DD03F+20240116135734.53fb4c6e@john-PC>
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 01:57:34PM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:42:38 +0000
> Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > + Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:12:49AM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> > > We found the following dmesg calltrace when testing the GMAC NIC
> > > notebook:
> > >
> > > [9.448656] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [9.448658] Unbalanced IRQ 43 wake disable
> > > [9.448673] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1083 at kernel/irq/manage.c:688
> > > irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128 [9.448717] CPU: 3 PID: 1083 Comm:
> > > ethtool Tainted: G O 4.19 #1 [9.448773] ...
> > > [9.448774] Call Trace:
> > > [9.448781] [<9000000000209b5c>] show_stack+0x34/0x140
> > > [9.448788] [<9000000000d52700>] dump_stack+0x98/0xd0
> > > [9.448794] [<9000000000228610>] __warn+0xa8/0x120
> > > [9.448797] [<9000000000d2fb60>] report_bug+0x98/0x130
> > > [9.448800] [<900000000020a418>] do_bp+0x248/0x2f0
> > > [9.448805] [<90000000002035f4>] handle_bp_int+0x4c/0x78
> > > [9.448808] [<900000000029ea40>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> > > [9.448813] [<9000000000a96a7c>] stmmac_set_wol+0x134/0x150
> > > [9.448819] [<9000000000be6ed0>] dev_ethtool+0x1368/0x2440
> > > [9.448824] [<9000000000c08350>] dev_ioctl+0x1f8/0x3e0
> > > [9.448827] [<9000000000bb2a34>] sock_ioctl+0x2a4/0x450
> > > [9.448832] [<900000000046f044>] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x738
> > > [9.448834] [<900000000046f778>] ksys_ioctl+0xa0/0xe8
> > > [9.448837] [<900000000046f7d8>] sys_ioctl+0x18/0x28
> > > [9.448840] [<9000000000211ab4>] syscall_common+0x20/0x34
> > > [9.448842] ---[ end trace 40c18d9aec863c3e ]---
> > >
> > > Multiple disable_irq_wake() calls will keep decreasing the IRQ
> > > wake_depth, When wake_depth is 0, calling disable_irq_wake() again,
> > > will report the above calltrace.
> > >
> > > Due to the need to appear in pairs, we cannot call
> > > disable_irq_wake() without calling enable_irq_wake(). Fix this by
> > > making sure there are no unbalanced disable_irq_wake() calls.
> >
> >
> > Hi Qiang Ma,
> >
> > This seems to be a fix, so I think it should be targeted at net:
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH net] ...
> >
> > And have a fixes tag, perhaps:
> >
> > Fixes: 3172d3afa998 ("stmmac: support wake up irq from
> > external sources (v3)")
> >
> > I don't think there is a need to repost this patch because of the
> > above, but please keep it in mind for next time.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <maqianga@uniontech.com>
> >
> > I see that the approach taken here is the same as that taken
> > by bcm_sysport_set_wol() to what seems to be a similar problem [1].
> > So the code change itself looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> >
> > [1] 61b423a8a0bd ("net: systemport: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake
> > calls") https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/61b423a8a0bd
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 10
> > > ++++++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c |
> > > 1 + 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h index
> > > cd7a9768de5f..b8c93b881a65 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h +++
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@
> > > struct stmmac_priv { u32 msg_enable;
> > > int wolopts;
> > > int wol_irq;
> > > + bool wol_irq_disabled;
> > > int clk_csr;
> > > struct timer_list eee_ctrl_timer;
> > > int lpi_irq;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c index
> > > f628411ae4ae..9a4d9492a781 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c +++
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c @@ -825,10
> > > +825,16 @@ static int stmmac_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct
> > > ethtool_wolinfo *wol) if (wol->wolopts) { pr_info("stmmac: wakeup
> > > enable\n"); device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 1);
> > > - enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + /* Avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls */
> > > + if (priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> > > + enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = false;
> > > } else {
> > > device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 0);
> > > - disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + /* Avoid unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls */
> > > + if (!priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> > > + disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c index
> > > 37e64283f910..baa396621ed8 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c +++
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c @@ -3565,6
> > > +3565,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct
> > > net_device *dev) /* Request the Wake IRQ in case of another line
> > > * is used for WoL
> > > */
> > > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> > > if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq) {
> > > int_name = priv->int_name_wol;
> > > sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "wol");
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> > >
> >
>
> Hi Simon Horman,
>
> The latest code does not seem to see the stmmac driver to avoid
> irq_wake call related fix committed, this fix is mainly for stmmac,
> refer to the commit:
>
> commit 61b423a8a0bd9aeaa046f9a24bed42e3a953a936 Author:
> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Date: Fri Oct 10 10:51:54
> 2014 -0700
>
> net: systemport: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls
>
> commit 083731a8fbe71d83fc908adf137dc98ee352f280
> Author: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri Oct 10 10:51:53 2014 -0700
>
> net: bcmgenet: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls
>
> Therefore, I think this submission is necessary at this time.
Yes, I agree.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Qiang Ma <maqianga@uniontech.com>
Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: ethtool: Fixed calltrace caused by unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:52:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240116155237.GA588419@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8553142D466DD03F+20240116135734.53fb4c6e@john-PC>
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 01:57:34PM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:42:38 +0000
> Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > + Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:12:49AM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote:
> > > We found the following dmesg calltrace when testing the GMAC NIC
> > > notebook:
> > >
> > > [9.448656] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [9.448658] Unbalanced IRQ 43 wake disable
> > > [9.448673] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1083 at kernel/irq/manage.c:688
> > > irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128 [9.448717] CPU: 3 PID: 1083 Comm:
> > > ethtool Tainted: G O 4.19 #1 [9.448773] ...
> > > [9.448774] Call Trace:
> > > [9.448781] [<9000000000209b5c>] show_stack+0x34/0x140
> > > [9.448788] [<9000000000d52700>] dump_stack+0x98/0xd0
> > > [9.448794] [<9000000000228610>] __warn+0xa8/0x120
> > > [9.448797] [<9000000000d2fb60>] report_bug+0x98/0x130
> > > [9.448800] [<900000000020a418>] do_bp+0x248/0x2f0
> > > [9.448805] [<90000000002035f4>] handle_bp_int+0x4c/0x78
> > > [9.448808] [<900000000029ea40>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xe0/0x128
> > > [9.448813] [<9000000000a96a7c>] stmmac_set_wol+0x134/0x150
> > > [9.448819] [<9000000000be6ed0>] dev_ethtool+0x1368/0x2440
> > > [9.448824] [<9000000000c08350>] dev_ioctl+0x1f8/0x3e0
> > > [9.448827] [<9000000000bb2a34>] sock_ioctl+0x2a4/0x450
> > > [9.448832] [<900000000046f044>] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x738
> > > [9.448834] [<900000000046f778>] ksys_ioctl+0xa0/0xe8
> > > [9.448837] [<900000000046f7d8>] sys_ioctl+0x18/0x28
> > > [9.448840] [<9000000000211ab4>] syscall_common+0x20/0x34
> > > [9.448842] ---[ end trace 40c18d9aec863c3e ]---
> > >
> > > Multiple disable_irq_wake() calls will keep decreasing the IRQ
> > > wake_depth, When wake_depth is 0, calling disable_irq_wake() again,
> > > will report the above calltrace.
> > >
> > > Due to the need to appear in pairs, we cannot call
> > > disable_irq_wake() without calling enable_irq_wake(). Fix this by
> > > making sure there are no unbalanced disable_irq_wake() calls.
> >
> >
> > Hi Qiang Ma,
> >
> > This seems to be a fix, so I think it should be targeted at net:
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH net] ...
> >
> > And have a fixes tag, perhaps:
> >
> > Fixes: 3172d3afa998 ("stmmac: support wake up irq from
> > external sources (v3)")
> >
> > I don't think there is a need to repost this patch because of the
> > above, but please keep it in mind for next time.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <maqianga@uniontech.com>
> >
> > I see that the approach taken here is the same as that taken
> > by bcm_sysport_set_wol() to what seems to be a similar problem [1].
> > So the code change itself looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> >
> > [1] 61b423a8a0bd ("net: systemport: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake
> > calls") https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/61b423a8a0bd
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 10
> > > ++++++++-- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c |
> > > 1 + 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h index
> > > cd7a9768de5f..b8c93b881a65 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h +++
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@
> > > struct stmmac_priv { u32 msg_enable;
> > > int wolopts;
> > > int wol_irq;
> > > + bool wol_irq_disabled;
> > > int clk_csr;
> > > struct timer_list eee_ctrl_timer;
> > > int lpi_irq;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c index
> > > f628411ae4ae..9a4d9492a781 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c +++
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c @@ -825,10
> > > +825,16 @@ static int stmmac_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct
> > > ethtool_wolinfo *wol) if (wol->wolopts) { pr_info("stmmac: wakeup
> > > enable\n"); device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 1);
> > > - enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + /* Avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls */
> > > + if (priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> > > + enable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = false;
> > > } else {
> > > device_set_wakeup_enable(priv->device, 0);
> > > - disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + /* Avoid unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls */
> > > + if (!priv->wol_irq_disabled)
> > > + disable_irq_wake(priv->wol_irq);
> > > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c index
> > > 37e64283f910..baa396621ed8 100644 ---
> > > a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c +++
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c @@ -3565,6
> > > +3565,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct
> > > net_device *dev) /* Request the Wake IRQ in case of another line
> > > * is used for WoL
> > > */
> > > + priv->wol_irq_disabled = true;
> > > if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq) {
> > > int_name = priv->int_name_wol;
> > > sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "wol");
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> > >
> >
>
> Hi Simon Horman,
>
> The latest code does not seem to see the stmmac driver to avoid
> irq_wake call related fix committed, this fix is mainly for stmmac,
> refer to the commit:
>
> commit 61b423a8a0bd9aeaa046f9a24bed42e3a953a936 Author:
> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Date: Fri Oct 10 10:51:54
> 2014 -0700
>
> net: systemport: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls
>
> commit 083731a8fbe71d83fc908adf137dc98ee352f280
> Author: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri Oct 10 10:51:53 2014 -0700
>
> net: bcmgenet: avoid unbalanced enable_irq_wake calls
>
> Therefore, I think this submission is necessary at this time.
Yes, I agree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-12 2:12 [PATCH] net: stmmac: ethtool: Fixed calltrace caused by unbalanced disable_irq_wake calls Qiang Ma
2024-01-12 2:12 ` Qiang Ma
2024-01-15 13:42 ` Simon Horman
2024-01-15 13:42 ` Simon Horman
2024-01-16 5:57 ` Qiang Ma
2024-01-16 5:57 ` Qiang Ma
2024-01-16 15:52 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-01-16 15:52 ` Simon Horman
2024-01-16 9:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-01-16 9:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-01-16 22:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-01-16 22:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-01-17 7:17 ` Qiang Ma
2024-01-17 7:17 ` Qiang Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240116155237.GA588419@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maqianga@uniontech.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.