* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
@ 2024-01-27 20:36 gregkh
2024-01-27 20:56 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-01-27 21:02 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2024-01-27 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wqu, dsterba, i, johannes.thumshirn; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024012740-mating-boxing-dd93@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
f546c4282673 ("btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:02:25 +1030
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not
64K aligned
[BUG]
There is a bug report that, on a ext4-converted btrfs, scrub leads to
various problems, including:
- "unable to find chunk map" errors
BTRFS info (device vdb): scrub: started on devid 1
BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 4096
BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 45056
This would lead to unrepariable errors.
- Use-after-free KASAN reports:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881013c9040 by task btrfs/909
CPU: 0 PID: 909 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.7.0-x64v3-dbg #11 c50636e9419a8354555555245df535e380563b2b
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 2023.11-2 12/24/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x43/0x60
print_report+0xcf/0x640
kasan_report+0xa6/0xd0
__blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
virtblk_prep_rq.isra.0+0x215/0x6a0 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
virtio_queue_rqs+0xc4/0x310 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0x780/0x860
__blk_flush_plug+0x1ba/0x220
blk_finish_plug+0x3b/0x60
submit_initial_group_read+0x10a/0x290 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
flush_scrub_stripes+0x38e/0x430 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
scrub_stripe+0x82a/0xae0 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
scrub_chunk+0x178/0x200 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x4bc/0xa30 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
btrfs_scrub_dev+0x398/0x810 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
btrfs_ioctl+0x4b9/0x3020 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xbd/0x100
do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xe0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
RIP: 0033:0x7f47e5e0952b
- Crash, mostly due to above use-after-free
[CAUSE]
The converted fs has the following data chunk layout:
item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 2214658048) itemoff 16025 itemsize 80
length 86016 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|single
For above logical bytenr 2214744064, it's at the chunk end
(2214658048 + 86016 = 2214744064).
This means btrfs_submit_bio() would split the bio, and trigger endio
function for both of the two halves.
However scrub_submit_initial_read() would only expect the endio function
to be called once, not any more.
This means the first endio function would already free the bbio::bio,
leaving the bvec freed, thus the 2nd endio call would lead to
use-after-free.
[FIX]
- Make sure scrub_read_endio() only updates bits in its range
Since we may read less than 64K at the end of the chunk, we should not
touch the bits beyond chunk boundary.
- Make sure scrub_submit_initial_read() only to read the chunk range
This is done by calculating the real number of sectors we need to
read, and add sector-by-sector to the bio.
Thankfully the scrub read repair path won't need extra fixes:
- scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read()
With above fixes, we won't update error bit for range beyond chunk,
thus scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read() should never submit any read
beyond the chunk.
Reported-by: Rongrong <i@rong.moe>
Fixes: e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
Tested-by: Rongrong <i@rong.moe>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index a01807cbd4d4..2d81b1a18a04 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -1098,12 +1098,22 @@ static void scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker(struct work_struct *work)
static void scrub_read_endio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
{
struct scrub_stripe *stripe = bbio->private;
+ struct bio_vec *bvec;
+ int sector_nr = calc_sector_number(stripe, bio_first_bvec_all(&bbio->bio));
+ int num_sectors;
+ u32 bio_size = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ ASSERT(sector_nr < stripe->nr_sectors);
+ bio_for_each_bvec_all(bvec, &bbio->bio, i)
+ bio_size += bvec->bv_len;
+ num_sectors = bio_size >> stripe->bg->fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
if (bbio->bio.bi_status) {
- bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
- bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+ bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
+ bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
} else {
- bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+ bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
}
bio_put(&bbio->bio);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&stripe->pending_io)) {
@@ -1701,6 +1711,9 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
struct btrfs_bio *bbio;
+ unsigned int nr_sectors = min(BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, stripe->bg->start +
+ stripe->bg->length - stripe->logical) >>
+ fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
int mirror = stripe->mirror_num;
ASSERT(stripe->bg);
@@ -1715,14 +1728,16 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
bbio = btrfs_bio_alloc(SCRUB_STRIPE_PAGES, REQ_OP_READ, fs_info,
scrub_read_endio, stripe);
- /* Read the whole stripe. */
bbio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = stripe->logical >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
- for (int i = 0; i < BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN >> PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
+ /* Read the whole range inside the chunk boundary. */
+ for (unsigned int cur = 0; cur < nr_sectors; cur++) {
+ struct page *page = scrub_stripe_get_page(stripe, cur);
+ unsigned int pgoff = scrub_stripe_get_page_offset(stripe, cur);
int ret;
- ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, stripe->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+ ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, page, fs_info->sectorsize, pgoff);
/* We should have allocated enough bio vectors. */
- ASSERT(ret == PAGE_SIZE);
+ ASSERT(ret == fs_info->sectorsize);
}
atomic_inc(&stripe->pending_io);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
2024-01-27 20:36 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
@ 2024-01-27 20:56 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-01-27 21:02 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned Qu Wenruo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2024-01-27 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, dsterba, i, johannes.thumshirn; +Cc: stable
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7939 bytes --]
On 2024/1/28 07:06, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
>
> To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
>
> git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
> git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> git cherry-pick -x c
> # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
> git commit -s
> git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024012740-mating-boxing-dd93@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Great new hints on the conflict resolve steps, especially for guys like
me, who is not familiar with stable kernels.
Would backport it soon.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Possible dependencies:
>
> f546c4282673 ("btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned")
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:02:25 +1030
> Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not
> 64K aligned
>
> [BUG]
> There is a bug report that, on a ext4-converted btrfs, scrub leads to
> various problems, including:
>
> - "unable to find chunk map" errors
> BTRFS info (device vdb): scrub: started on devid 1
> BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 4096
> BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 45056
>
> This would lead to unrepariable errors.
>
> - Use-after-free KASAN reports:
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881013c9040 by task btrfs/909
> CPU: 0 PID: 909 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.7.0-x64v3-dbg #11 c50636e9419a8354555555245df535e380563b2b
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 2023.11-2 12/24/2023
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x43/0x60
> print_report+0xcf/0x640
> kasan_report+0xa6/0xd0
> __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
> virtblk_prep_rq.isra.0+0x215/0x6a0 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
> virtio_queue_rqs+0xc4/0x310 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
> blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0x780/0x860
> __blk_flush_plug+0x1ba/0x220
> blk_finish_plug+0x3b/0x60
> submit_initial_group_read+0x10a/0x290 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
> flush_scrub_stripes+0x38e/0x430 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
> scrub_stripe+0x82a/0xae0 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
> scrub_chunk+0x178/0x200 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
> scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x4bc/0xa30 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
> btrfs_scrub_dev+0x398/0x810 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
> btrfs_ioctl+0x4b9/0x3020 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0xbd/0x100
> do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xe0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
> RIP: 0033:0x7f47e5e0952b
>
> - Crash, mostly due to above use-after-free
>
> [CAUSE]
> The converted fs has the following data chunk layout:
>
> item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 2214658048) itemoff 16025 itemsize 80
> length 86016 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|single
>
> For above logical bytenr 2214744064, it's at the chunk end
> (2214658048 + 86016 = 2214744064).
>
> This means btrfs_submit_bio() would split the bio, and trigger endio
> function for both of the two halves.
>
> However scrub_submit_initial_read() would only expect the endio function
> to be called once, not any more.
> This means the first endio function would already free the bbio::bio,
> leaving the bvec freed, thus the 2nd endio call would lead to
> use-after-free.
>
> [FIX]
> - Make sure scrub_read_endio() only updates bits in its range
> Since we may read less than 64K at the end of the chunk, we should not
> touch the bits beyond chunk boundary.
>
> - Make sure scrub_submit_initial_read() only to read the chunk range
> This is done by calculating the real number of sectors we need to
> read, and add sector-by-sector to the bio.
>
> Thankfully the scrub read repair path won't need extra fixes:
>
> - scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read()
> With above fixes, we won't update error bit for range beyond chunk,
> thus scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read() should never submit any read
> beyond the chunk.
>
> Reported-by: Rongrong <i@rong.moe>
> Fixes: e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
> Tested-by: Rongrong <i@rong.moe>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index a01807cbd4d4..2d81b1a18a04 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -1098,12 +1098,22 @@ static void scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> static void scrub_read_endio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
> {
> struct scrub_stripe *stripe = bbio->private;
> + struct bio_vec *bvec;
> + int sector_nr = calc_sector_number(stripe, bio_first_bvec_all(&bbio->bio));
> + int num_sectors;
> + u32 bio_size = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + ASSERT(sector_nr < stripe->nr_sectors);
> + bio_for_each_bvec_all(bvec, &bbio->bio, i)
> + bio_size += bvec->bv_len;
> + num_sectors = bio_size >> stripe->bg->fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
>
> if (bbio->bio.bi_status) {
> - bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
> - bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
> + bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
> + bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
> } else {
> - bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
> + bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
> }
> bio_put(&bbio->bio);
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&stripe->pending_io)) {
> @@ -1701,6 +1711,9 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
> {
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
> struct btrfs_bio *bbio;
> + unsigned int nr_sectors = min(BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, stripe->bg->start +
> + stripe->bg->length - stripe->logical) >>
> + fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> int mirror = stripe->mirror_num;
>
> ASSERT(stripe->bg);
> @@ -1715,14 +1728,16 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
> bbio = btrfs_bio_alloc(SCRUB_STRIPE_PAGES, REQ_OP_READ, fs_info,
> scrub_read_endio, stripe);
>
> - /* Read the whole stripe. */
> bbio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = stripe->logical >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> - for (int i = 0; i < BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN >> PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
> + /* Read the whole range inside the chunk boundary. */
> + for (unsigned int cur = 0; cur < nr_sectors; cur++) {
> + struct page *page = scrub_stripe_get_page(stripe, cur);
> + unsigned int pgoff = scrub_stripe_get_page_offset(stripe, cur);
> int ret;
>
> - ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, stripe->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> + ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, page, fs_info->sectorsize, pgoff);
> /* We should have allocated enough bio vectors. */
> - ASSERT(ret == PAGE_SIZE);
> + ASSERT(ret == fs_info->sectorsize);
> }
> atomic_inc(&stripe->pending_io);
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 7027 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6.6.y] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned
2024-01-27 20:36 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2024-01-27 20:56 ` Qu Wenruo
@ 2024-01-27 21:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-01-27 21:27 ` Greg KH
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2024-01-27 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Rongrong, Johannes Thumshirn, David Sterba
[ Upstream commit f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f ]
[BUG]
There is a bug report that, on a ext4-converted btrfs, scrub leads to
various problems, including:
- "unable to find chunk map" errors
BTRFS info (device vdb): scrub: started on devid 1
BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 4096
BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 45056
This would lead to unrepariable errors.
- Use-after-free KASAN reports:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881013c9040 by task btrfs/909
CPU: 0 PID: 909 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.7.0-x64v3-dbg #11 c50636e9419a8354555555245df535e380563b2b
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 2023.11-2 12/24/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x43/0x60
print_report+0xcf/0x640
kasan_report+0xa6/0xd0
__blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
virtblk_prep_rq.isra.0+0x215/0x6a0 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
virtio_queue_rqs+0xc4/0x310 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0x780/0x860
__blk_flush_plug+0x1ba/0x220
blk_finish_plug+0x3b/0x60
submit_initial_group_read+0x10a/0x290 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
flush_scrub_stripes+0x38e/0x430 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
scrub_stripe+0x82a/0xae0 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
scrub_chunk+0x178/0x200 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x4bc/0xa30 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
btrfs_scrub_dev+0x398/0x810 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
btrfs_ioctl+0x4b9/0x3020 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xbd/0x100
do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xe0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
RIP: 0033:0x7f47e5e0952b
- Crash, mostly due to above use-after-free
[CAUSE]
The converted fs has the following data chunk layout:
item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 2214658048) itemoff 16025 itemsize 80
length 86016 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|single
For above logical bytenr 2214744064, it's at the chunk end
(2214658048 + 86016 = 2214744064).
This means btrfs_submit_bio() would split the bio, and trigger endio
function for both of the two halves.
However scrub_submit_initial_read() would only expect the endio function
to be called once, not any more.
This means the first endio function would already free the bbio::bio,
leaving the bvec freed, thus the 2nd endio call would lead to
use-after-free.
[FIX]
- Make sure scrub_read_endio() only updates bits in its range
Since we may read less than 64K at the end of the chunk, we should not
touch the bits beyond chunk boundary.
- Make sure scrub_submit_initial_read() only to read the chunk range
This is done by calculating the real number of sectors we need to
read, and add sector-by-sector to the bio.
Thankfully the scrub read repair path won't need extra fixes:
- scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read()
With above fixes, we won't update error bit for range beyond chunk,
thus scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read() should never submit any read
beyond the chunk.
Reported-by: Rongrong <i@rong.moe>
Fixes: e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
Tested-by: Rongrong <i@rong.moe>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ Use min_t() to fix a compiling error due to difference types ]
(cherry picked from commit f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f)
---
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 4445a52a0707..1e3ff87d0447 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -1099,12 +1099,22 @@ static void scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker(struct work_struct *work)
static void scrub_read_endio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
{
struct scrub_stripe *stripe = bbio->private;
+ struct bio_vec *bvec;
+ int sector_nr = calc_sector_number(stripe, bio_first_bvec_all(&bbio->bio));
+ int num_sectors;
+ u32 bio_size = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ ASSERT(sector_nr < stripe->nr_sectors);
+ bio_for_each_bvec_all(bvec, &bbio->bio, i)
+ bio_size += bvec->bv_len;
+ num_sectors = bio_size >> stripe->bg->fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
if (bbio->bio.bi_status) {
- bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
- bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+ bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
+ bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
} else {
- bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+ bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
}
bio_put(&bbio->bio);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&stripe->pending_io)) {
@@ -1640,6 +1650,9 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
struct btrfs_bio *bbio;
+ unsigned int nr_sectors = min_t(u64, BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, stripe->bg->start +
+ stripe->bg->length - stripe->logical) >>
+ fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
int mirror = stripe->mirror_num;
ASSERT(stripe->bg);
@@ -1649,14 +1662,16 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
bbio = btrfs_bio_alloc(SCRUB_STRIPE_PAGES, REQ_OP_READ, fs_info,
scrub_read_endio, stripe);
- /* Read the whole stripe. */
bbio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = stripe->logical >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
- for (int i = 0; i < BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN >> PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
+ /* Read the whole range inside the chunk boundary. */
+ for (unsigned int cur = 0; cur < nr_sectors; cur++) {
+ struct page *page = scrub_stripe_get_page(stripe, cur);
+ unsigned int pgoff = scrub_stripe_get_page_offset(stripe, cur);
int ret;
- ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, stripe->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+ ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, page, fs_info->sectorsize, pgoff);
/* We should have allocated enough bio vectors. */
- ASSERT(ret == PAGE_SIZE);
+ ASSERT(ret == fs_info->sectorsize);
}
atomic_inc(&stripe->pending_io);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6.y] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned
2024-01-27 21:02 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned Qu Wenruo
@ 2024-01-27 21:27 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2024-01-27 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo; +Cc: stable, Rongrong, Johannes Thumshirn, David Sterba
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 07:32:08AM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [ Upstream commit f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f ]
>
Now queued up, thanks!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-27 21:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-27 20:36 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2024-01-27 20:56 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-01-27 21:02 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned Qu Wenruo
2024-01-27 21:27 ` Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.