From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
kernel_team@skhynix.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, duyuyang@gmail.com,
johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/26] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:10:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240124115938.80132-6-byungchul@sk.com>
Hi Byungchul,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 0dd3ee31125508cd67f7e7172247f05b7fd1753a]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Byungchul-Park/llist-Move-llist_-head-node-definition-to-types-h/20240124-200243
base: 0dd3ee31125508cd67f7e7172247f05b7fd1753a
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124115938.80132-6-byungchul%40sk.com
patch subject: [PATCH v11 05/26] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing
config: hexagon-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project a31a60074717fc40887cfe132b77eec93bedd307)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12:
In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16:
In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:23:
In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12:
In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16:
In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:23:
In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12:
In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16:
In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:23:
In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:7000:
>> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c:246:13: warning: stack frame size (1288) exceeds limit (1024) in 'test_new_blocks_simple' [-Wframe-larger-than]
246 | static void test_new_blocks_simple(struct kunit *test)
| ^
7 warnings generated.
--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:150:13: warning: stack frame size (1064) exceeds limit (1024) in 'test_prepare_array' [-Wframe-larger-than]
150 | static void test_prepare_array(struct kunit *test)
| ^
1 warning generated.
--
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:9:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_private.h:11:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38:
In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:9:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_private.h:11:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38:
In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:9:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_private.h:11:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38:
In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:3598:
>> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c:1926:13: warning: stack frame size (1296) exceeds limit (1024) in 'vcap_api_next_lookup_advanced_test' [-Wframe-larger-than]
1926 | static void vcap_api_next_lookup_advanced_test(struct kunit *test)
| ^
7 warnings generated.
Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FRAME_POINTER
Depends on [n]: DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && (M68K || UML || SUPERH) || ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- DEPT [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y] && !MIPS && !PPC && !ARM && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE && !ARC && !X86
vim +/test_new_blocks_simple +246 fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 245
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 @246 static void test_new_blocks_simple(struct kunit *test)
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 247 {
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 248 struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 249 struct inode inode = { .i_sb = sb, };
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 250 struct ext4_allocation_request ar;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 251 ext4_group_t i, goal_group = TEST_GOAL_GROUP;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 252 int err = 0;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 253 ext4_fsblk_t found;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 254 struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 255
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 256 ar.inode = &inode;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 257
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 258 /* get block at goal */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 259 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 260 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 261 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal, found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 262 "failed to alloc block at goal, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 263 ar.goal, found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 264
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 265 /* get block after goal in goal group */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 266 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 267 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 268 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 269 "failed to alloc block after goal in goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 270 ar.goal + 1, found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 271
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 272 /* get block after goal group */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 273 mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, goal_group, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 274 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 275 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 276 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 277 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 278 "failed to alloc block after goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 279 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 280
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 281 /* get block before goal group */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 282 for (i = goal_group; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 283 mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 284 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 285 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 286 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 287 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0) + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 288 "failed to alloc block before goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 289 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0 + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1)), found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 290
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 291 /* no block available, fail to allocate block */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 292 for (i = 0; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 293 mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 294 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 295 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 296 KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, err, 0,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 297 "unexpectedly get block when no block is available");
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 298 }
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 299
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-28 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 11:59 [PATCH v11 00/26] DEPT(Dependency Tracker) Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 01/26] llist: Move llist_{head,node} definition to types.h Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 01/26] llist: Move llist_{head, node} " Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 02/26] dept: Implement Dept(Dependency Tracker) Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 03/26] dept: Add single event dependency tracker APIs Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 04/26] dept: Add lock " Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 05/26] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-28 13:10 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-01-28 15:58 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 06/26] dept: Add proc knobs to show stats and dependency graph Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 07/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to wait_for_completion()/complete() Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 07/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start, end}() " Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 08/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to swait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 09/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 09/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start, end}() " Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 10/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to hashed-waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 10/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start, end}() " Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 11/26] dept: Distinguish each syscall context from another Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 12/26] dept: Distinguish each work " Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 13/26] dept: Add a mechanism to refill the internal memory pools on running out Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 14/26] locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplus: Use a weaker annotation in AP thread Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-26 17:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-26 17:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-29 4:20 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-29 4:20 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-30 2:58 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-30 2:58 ` Byungchul Park
2024-02-12 15:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-13 1:18 ` Byungchul Park
2024-06-04 3:10 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 15/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to dma fence wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 15/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start, end}() " Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 16/26] dept: Track timeout waits separately with a new Kconfig Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 17/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to wait_for_completion()/complete() Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 18/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to swait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 19/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 20/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 21/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to dma fence wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 22/26] dept: Record the latest one out of consecutive waits of the same class Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 23/26] dept: Make Dept able to work with an external wgen Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 24/26] dept: Track PG_locked with dept Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 25/26] dept: Print event context requestor's stacktrace on report Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-28 14:44 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 26/26] locking/lockdep, fs/jbd2: Use a weaker annotation in journal handling Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=duyuyang@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.