From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify which legacy packet instructions existed
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 13:02:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131190205.GA1051028@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131033759.3634-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1569 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:37:59PM -0800, Dave Thaler wrote:
> As discussed in mailing list discussion at
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/5LnnKm093cGpOmDI9TnLQLBXyys/
> this patch updates the "Legacy BPF Packet access instructions"
> section to clarify which instructions are deprecated (vs which
> were never defined and so are not deprecated).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> ---
> Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> index af43227b6..cf08337bf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -635,7 +635,9 @@ Legacy BPF Packet access instructions
> -------------------------------------
>
> BPF previously introduced special instructions for access to packet data that were
> -carried over from classic BPF. However, these instructions are
> +carried over from classic BPF. These instructions used an instruction
> +class of BPF_LD, a size modifier of BPF_W, BPF_H, or BPF_B, and a
> +mode modifier of BPF_ABS or BPF_IND. However, these instructions are
> deprecated and should no longer be used. All legacy packet access
> instructions belong to the "legacy" conformance group instead of the "basic"
> conformance group.
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify which legacy packet instructions existed
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 13:02:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131190205.GA1051028@maniforge> (raw)
Message-ID: <20240131190205.PkwI7htGx9Skf_BUUvZpb1mfxpdsjUkPewt-YtoVFc4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131033759.3634-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1569 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:37:59PM -0800, Dave Thaler wrote:
> As discussed in mailing list discussion at
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/5LnnKm093cGpOmDI9TnLQLBXyys/
> this patch updates the "Legacy BPF Packet access instructions"
> section to clarify which instructions are deprecated (vs which
> were never defined and so are not deprecated).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> ---
> Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> index af43227b6..cf08337bf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -635,7 +635,9 @@ Legacy BPF Packet access instructions
> -------------------------------------
>
> BPF previously introduced special instructions for access to packet data that were
> -carried over from classic BPF. However, these instructions are
> +carried over from classic BPF. These instructions used an instruction
> +class of BPF_LD, a size modifier of BPF_W, BPF_H, or BPF_B, and a
> +mode modifier of BPF_ABS or BPF_IND. However, these instructions are
> deprecated and should no longer be used. All legacy packet access
> instructions belong to the "legacy" conformance group instead of the "basic"
> conformance group.
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 76 bytes --]
--
Bpf mailing list
Bpf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-31 3:37 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify which legacy packet instructions existed Dave Thaler
2024-01-31 3:37 ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler
2024-01-31 18:44 ` Yonghong Song
2024-01-31 18:44 ` [Bpf] " Yonghong Song
2024-01-31 19:02 ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-01-31 19:02 ` David Vernet
2024-02-01 10:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240131190205.GA1051028@maniforge \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=bpf@ietf.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dthaler1968@gmail.com \
--cc=dthaler1968@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.