All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/23] gpio: provide and use gpiod_get_label()
Date: Mon,  5 Feb 2024 10:33:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240205093418.39755-5-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240205093418.39755-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

We will soon serialize access to the descriptor label using SRCU. The
write-side of the protection will require calling synchronize_srcu()
which must not be called from atomic context. We have two irq helpers:
gpiochip_lock_as_irq() and gpiochip_unlock_as_irq() that set the label
if the GPIO is not requested but is being used as interrupt. They are
called with a spinlock held from the interrupt subsystem.

They must not do it if we are to use SRCU so instead let's move the
special corner case to a dedicated getter.

First: let's implement and use the getter where it's applicable.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 9 +++++++--
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h      | 1 +
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
index 34d6712fa07c..2c0a0700762d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
@@ -2305,8 +2305,8 @@ static void gpio_desc_to_lineinfo(struct gpio_desc *desc,
 		if (desc->name)
 			strscpy(info->name, desc->name, sizeof(info->name));
 
-		if (desc->label)
-			strscpy(info->consumer, desc->label,
+		if (gpiod_get_label(desc))
+			strscpy(info->consumer, gpiod_get_label(desc),
 				sizeof(info->consumer));
 
 		dflags = READ_ONCE(desc->flags);
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 4c18b693d06c..cfd311ec5dda 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ static void gpiochip_irqchip_free_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc);
 
 static bool gpiolib_initialized;
 
+const char *gpiod_get_label(struct gpio_desc *desc)
+{
+	return desc->label;
+}
+
 static inline void desc_set_label(struct gpio_desc *d, const char *label)
 {
 	d->label = label;
@@ -2385,7 +2390,7 @@ char *gpiochip_dup_line_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 	 *
 	 * Until this happens, this allocation needs to be atomic.
 	 */
-	label = kstrdup(desc->label, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	label = kstrdup(gpiod_get_label(desc), GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!label)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
@@ -4726,7 +4731,7 @@ static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_device *gdev)
 			is_irq = test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &desc->flags);
 			active_low = test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags);
 			seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-20.20s|%-20.20s) %s %s %s%s\n",
-				   gpio, desc->name ?: "", desc->label,
+				   gpio, desc->name ?: "", gpiod_get_label(desc),
 				   is_out ? "out" : "in ",
 				   value >= 0 ? (value ? "hi" : "lo") : "?  ",
 				   is_irq ? "IRQ " : "",
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index c3ae5bfa3f2e..1058f326fe2b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ int gpio_set_debounce_timeout(struct gpio_desc *desc, unsigned int debounce);
 int gpiod_hog(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *name,
 		unsigned long lflags, enum gpiod_flags dflags);
 int gpiochip_get_ngpios(struct gpio_chip *gc, struct device *dev);
+const char *gpiod_get_label(struct gpio_desc *desc);
 
 /*
  * Return the GPIO number of the passed descriptor relative to its chip
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-05  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-05  9:33 [PATCH v2 00/23] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] gpio: protect the list of GPIO devices with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] gpio: of: assign and read the hog pointer atomically Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] gpio: remove unused logging helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:33 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] gpio: don't set label from irq helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure to struct gpio_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 12:16   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05 13:54     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 13:57       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05 14:04         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 14:06           ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05 14:07             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] gpio: protect the descriptor label with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] gpio: sysfs: use gpio_device_find() to iterate over existing devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 12:18   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05 13:19     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 13:38       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05 13:39         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 13:47           ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05 13:50             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 13:58               ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05 14:04                 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] gpio: remove gpio_lock Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] gpio: reinforce desc->flags handling Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] gpio: remove unneeded code from gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] gpio: sysfs: extend the critical section for unregistering sysfs devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] gpio: sysfs: pass the GPIO device - not chip - to sysfs callbacks Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] gpio: cdev: replace gpiochip_get_desc() with gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] gpio: cdev: don't access gdev->chip if it's not needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] gpio: don't dereference gdev->chip in gpiochip_setup_dev() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] gpio: reduce the functionality of validate_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 12:22   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05 19:22     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-06 12:30       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] gpio: remove unnecessary checks from gpiod_to_chip() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] gpio: add the can_sleep flag to struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure " Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 12:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05 13:30     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 19:32     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05 19:36     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-06 12:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-06 12:57         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-06 13:13           ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-06 13:23             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-06 13:43               ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] gpio: remove the RW semaphore from the GPIO device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-05  9:34 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] gpio: mark unsafe gpio_chip manipulators as deprecated Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240205093418.39755-5-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.