From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Raghavendra, Vignesh" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-wakeup: Configure ti-sysc for wkup_uart0
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:56:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213085619.GF52537@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e28a4f16-f9a8-499a-a6a3-7acef0e0aa10@ti.com>
* Raghavendra, Vignesh <vigneshr@ti.com> [231227 15:22]:
>
>
> On 12/27/2023 7:29 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:12:15 +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> The devices in the wkup domain are capable of waking up the system from
> >> suspend. We can configure the wkup domain devices in a generic way using
> >> the ti-sysc interconnect target module driver like we have done with the
> >> earlier TI SoCs.
> >>
> >> As ti-sysc manages the SYSCONFIG related registers independent of the
> >> child hardware device, the wake-up configuration is also set even if
> >> wkup_uart0 is reserved by sysfw.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-wakeup: Configure ti-sysc for wkup_uart0
> > commit: 86224524b52a8efba26f920736d08c8bfdd22d87
> >
>
>
> Please ignore above. I meant to pick v4. Sorry for the noise!
So we need to add ti,no-reset-on-init as noted by Markus. As I'm not
seeing this in Linux next, I'll send out v5 patch. If you need an
incremental fix I can do that too naturally.
Regards,
Tony
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Raghavendra, Vignesh" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-wakeup: Configure ti-sysc for wkup_uart0
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:56:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213085619.GF52537@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e28a4f16-f9a8-499a-a6a3-7acef0e0aa10@ti.com>
* Raghavendra, Vignesh <vigneshr@ti.com> [231227 15:22]:
>
>
> On 12/27/2023 7:29 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:12:15 +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> The devices in the wkup domain are capable of waking up the system from
> >> suspend. We can configure the wkup domain devices in a generic way using
> >> the ti-sysc interconnect target module driver like we have done with the
> >> earlier TI SoCs.
> >>
> >> As ti-sysc manages the SYSCONFIG related registers independent of the
> >> child hardware device, the wake-up configuration is also set even if
> >> wkup_uart0 is reserved by sysfw.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-wakeup: Configure ti-sysc for wkup_uart0
> > commit: 86224524b52a8efba26f920736d08c8bfdd22d87
> >
>
>
> Please ignore above. I meant to pick v4. Sorry for the noise!
So we need to add ti,no-reset-on-init as noted by Markus. As I'm not
seeing this in Linux next, I'll send out v5 patch. If you need an
incremental fix I can do that too naturally.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-12 11:12 [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-wakeup: Configure ti-sysc for wkup_uart0 Tony Lindgren
2023-09-12 11:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-09-12 15:38 ` Dhruva Gole
2023-09-12 15:38 ` Dhruva Gole
2023-12-27 13:59 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2023-12-27 13:59 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2023-12-27 15:22 ` Raghavendra, Vignesh
2023-12-27 15:22 ` Raghavendra, Vignesh
2024-02-13 8:56 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2024-02-13 8:56 ` Tony Lindgren
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-18 7:38 Tony Lindgren
2023-12-18 7:38 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240213085619.GF52537@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=msp@baylibre.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.