Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop redundant GPIO node

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@runtux.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Robin van der Gracht <robin@protonic.nl>,
	Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop redundant GPIO node
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:19:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213161905.GA1459669-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d603a588-d312-486e-b6c9-647a6b90580c@linaro.org>

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/02/2024 14:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated
> >> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several
> >> other variations and combinations.
> > 
> > Is this documented?
> 
> Yes, writing schema says what the example is. We repeated it multiple
> times on multiple reviews, we made multiple commits multiple times and I
> briefly mentioned it also in my talks.

While yes, this is the guidance, I think this case has provided enough 
justification to keep it. Let's move on please.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel