From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Ming Wang <wangming01@loongson.cn>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/4] perf parse-regs: Introduce a weak function arch__sample_reg_masks()
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:39:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240214113947.240957-4-leo.yan@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214113947.240957-1-leo.yan@linux.dev>
Every architecture can provide a register list for sampling. If an
architecture doesn't support register sampling, it won't define the data
structure 'sample_reg_masks'. Consequently, any code using this
structure must be protected by the macro 'HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT'.
This patch defines a weak function, arch__sample_reg_masks(), which will
be replaced by an architecture-defined function for returning the
architecture's register list. With this refactoring, the function always
exists, the condition checking for 'HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' is not
needed anymore, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>
---
tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c | 2 ++
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c | 8 ++------
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 9 +++++++++
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 3 +--
13 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c
index 2c56e8b56ddf..f94a0210c7b7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c
index ba1144366e85..aab1cc2bc283 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c
@@ -12,5 +12,7 @@
void arch__add_leaf_frame_record_opts(struct record_opts *opts)
{
+ const struct sample_reg *sample_reg_masks = arch__sample_reg_masks();
+
opts->sample_user_regs |= sample_reg_masks[PERF_REG_ARM64_LR].mask;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
index 1b79d8eab22f..09308665e28a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#define HWCAP_SVE (1 << 22)
#endif
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(x0, PERF_REG_ARM64_X0),
SMPL_REG(x1, PERF_REG_ARM64_X1),
SMPL_REG(x2, PERF_REG_ARM64_X2),
@@ -175,3 +175,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
}
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c
index c0877c264d49..6b1665f41180 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c
index 2c56e8b56ddf..f94a0210c7b7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c
index c0877c264d49..6b1665f41180 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index b38aa056eea0..e8e6e6fc6f17 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
#define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
SMPL_REG(r2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R2),
@@ -232,3 +232,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
index c0877c264d49..6b1665f41180 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c
index c0877c264d49..6b1665f41180 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
index b813502a2727..12fd93f04802 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#include "../../../util/pmu.h"
#include "../../../util/pmus.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(AX, PERF_REG_X86_AX),
SMPL_REG(BX, PERF_REG_X86_BX),
SMPL_REG(CX, PERF_REG_X86_CX),
@@ -276,6 +276,11 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
return SDT_ARG_VALID;
}
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
+
uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
{
struct perf_event_attr attr = {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c
index a4a100425b3a..cda1c620968e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c
@@ -46,22 +46,18 @@ __parse_regs(const struct option *opt, const char *str, int unset, bool intr)
if (!strcmp(s, "?")) {
fprintf(stderr, "available registers: ");
-#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
- for (r = sample_reg_masks; r->name; r++) {
+ for (r = arch__sample_reg_masks(); r->name; r++) {
if (r->mask & mask)
fprintf(stderr, "%s ", r->name);
}
-#endif
fputc('\n', stderr);
/* just printing available regs */
goto error;
}
-#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
- for (r = sample_reg_masks; r->name; r++) {
+ for (r = arch__sample_reg_masks(); r->name; r++) {
if ((r->mask & mask) && !strcasecmp(s, r->name))
break;
}
-#endif
if (!r || !r->name) {
ui__warning("Unknown register \"%s\", check man page or run \"perf record %s?\"\n",
s, intr ? "-I" : "--user-regs=");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
index 64724eb58dd5..44b90bbf2d07 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -21,6 +21,15 @@ uint64_t __weak arch__user_reg_mask(void)
return 0;
}
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+ SMPL_REG_END
+};
+
+const struct sample_reg * __weak arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
+
const char *perf_reg_name(int id, const char *arch)
{
const char *reg_name = NULL;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
index 7fd0c7b4cec1..f2d0736d65cc 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ enum {
int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op);
uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void);
uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void);
-
-extern const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[];
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void);
const char *perf_reg_name(int id, const char *arch);
int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id);
--
2.34.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Ming Wang <wangming01@loongson.cn>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/4] perf parse-regs: Introduce a weak function arch__sample_reg_masks()
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:39:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240214113947.240957-4-leo.yan@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214113947.240957-1-leo.yan@linux.dev>
Every architecture can provide a register list for sampling. If an
architecture doesn't support register sampling, it won't define the data
structure 'sample_reg_masks'. Consequently, any code using this
structure must be protected by the macro 'HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT'.
This patch defines a weak function, arch__sample_reg_masks(), which will
be replaced by an architecture-defined function for returning the
architecture's register list. With this refactoring, the function always
exists, the condition checking for 'HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' is not
needed anymore, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>
---
tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c | 2 ++
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c | 8 ++------
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 9 +++++++++
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 3 +--
13 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c
index 2c56e8b56ddf..f94a0210c7b7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c
index ba1144366e85..aab1cc2bc283 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/machine.c
@@ -12,5 +12,7 @@
void arch__add_leaf_frame_record_opts(struct record_opts *opts)
{
+ const struct sample_reg *sample_reg_masks = arch__sample_reg_masks();
+
opts->sample_user_regs |= sample_reg_masks[PERF_REG_ARM64_LR].mask;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
index 1b79d8eab22f..09308665e28a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#define HWCAP_SVE (1 << 22)
#endif
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(x0, PERF_REG_ARM64_X0),
SMPL_REG(x1, PERF_REG_ARM64_X1),
SMPL_REG(x2, PERF_REG_ARM64_X2),
@@ -175,3 +175,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
}
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c
index c0877c264d49..6b1665f41180 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c
index 2c56e8b56ddf..f94a0210c7b7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/loongarch/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c
index c0877c264d49..6b1665f41180 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/mips/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index b38aa056eea0..e8e6e6fc6f17 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
#define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
SMPL_REG(r2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R2),
@@ -232,3 +232,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
index c0877c264d49..6b1665f41180 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c
index c0877c264d49..6b1665f41180 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -15,3 +15,8 @@ uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
{
return PERF_REGS_MASK;
}
+
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
index b813502a2727..12fd93f04802 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#include "../../../util/pmu.h"
#include "../../../util/pmus.h"
-const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(AX, PERF_REG_X86_AX),
SMPL_REG(BX, PERF_REG_X86_BX),
SMPL_REG(CX, PERF_REG_X86_CX),
@@ -276,6 +276,11 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
return SDT_ARG_VALID;
}
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
+
uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
{
struct perf_event_attr attr = {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c
index a4a100425b3a..cda1c620968e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c
@@ -46,22 +46,18 @@ __parse_regs(const struct option *opt, const char *str, int unset, bool intr)
if (!strcmp(s, "?")) {
fprintf(stderr, "available registers: ");
-#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
- for (r = sample_reg_masks; r->name; r++) {
+ for (r = arch__sample_reg_masks(); r->name; r++) {
if (r->mask & mask)
fprintf(stderr, "%s ", r->name);
}
-#endif
fputc('\n', stderr);
/* just printing available regs */
goto error;
}
-#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
- for (r = sample_reg_masks; r->name; r++) {
+ for (r = arch__sample_reg_masks(); r->name; r++) {
if ((r->mask & mask) && !strcasecmp(s, r->name))
break;
}
-#endif
if (!r || !r->name) {
ui__warning("Unknown register \"%s\", check man page or run \"perf record %s?\"\n",
s, intr ? "-I" : "--user-regs=");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
index 64724eb58dd5..44b90bbf2d07 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -21,6 +21,15 @@ uint64_t __weak arch__user_reg_mask(void)
return 0;
}
+static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
+ SMPL_REG_END
+};
+
+const struct sample_reg * __weak arch__sample_reg_masks(void)
+{
+ return sample_reg_masks;
+}
+
const char *perf_reg_name(int id, const char *arch)
{
const char *reg_name = NULL;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
index 7fd0c7b4cec1..f2d0736d65cc 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ enum {
int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op);
uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void);
uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void);
-
-extern const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[];
+const struct sample_reg *arch__sample_reg_masks(void);
const char *perf_reg_name(int id, const char *arch);
int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id);
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 11:39 [PATCH v1 0/4] perf parse-regs: Cleanup config and building Leo Yan
2024-02-14 11:39 ` Leo Yan
2024-02-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] perf build: Remove unused CONFIG_PERF_REGS Leo Yan
2024-02-14 11:39 ` Leo Yan
2024-02-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] perf parse-regs: Always build perf register functions Leo Yan
2024-02-14 11:39 ` Leo Yan
2024-02-14 11:39 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2024-02-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] perf parse-regs: Introduce a weak function arch__sample_reg_masks() Leo Yan
2024-02-14 11:39 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] perf build: Cleanup perf register configuration Leo Yan
2024-02-14 11:39 ` Leo Yan
2024-02-14 22:42 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] perf parse-regs: Cleanup config and building Ian Rogers
2024-02-14 22:42 ` Ian Rogers
2024-02-15 6:32 ` Leo Yan
2024-02-15 6:32 ` Leo Yan
2024-02-16 19:42 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-02-16 19:42 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240214113947.240957-4-leo.yan@linux.dev \
--to=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=wangming01@loongson.cn \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.