From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:06:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402151404.0CAF526@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213154416.422739-4-kuba@kernel.org>
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 07:44:15AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> [...]
> +/**
> + * XFAIL()
> + *
> + * @statement: statement to run after reporting XFAIL
> + * @fmt: format string
> + * @...: optional arguments
> + *
> + * .. code-block:: c
> + *
> + * XFAIL(statement, fmt, ...);
> + *
> + * This forces a "pass" after reporting why something is expected to fail,
> + * and runs "statement", which is usually "return" or "goto skip".
> + */
> +#define XFAIL(statement, fmt, ...) do { \
> + snprintf(_metadata->results->reason, \
> + sizeof(_metadata->results->reason), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + if (TH_LOG_ENABLED) { \
> + fprintf(TH_LOG_STREAM, "# XFAIL %s\n", \
Oh! I just noticed this while testing changes to use XFAIL, there is an
alignment issue: one too many spaces after "XFAIL" above, which leads
to misaligned output.
fprintf(TH_LOG_STREAM, "# XFAIL %s\n", \
fprintf(TH_LOG_STREAM, "# SKIP %s\n", \
Compare the position of "%s" above...
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-15 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 15:44 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: pass step via shared memory Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:54 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-19 2:21 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: use KSFT_* exit codes Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:55 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-14 19:40 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-02-14 21:46 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-02-15 0:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-15 0:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-15 22:06 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-02-15 22:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: ip_local_port_range: use XFAIL instead of SKIP Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-13 18:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Kees Cook
2024-02-14 10:09 ` Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202402151404.0CAF526@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.