From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle ERETA[AB] instructions
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:20:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240219092014.783809-13-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240219092014.783809-1-maz@kernel.org>
Now that we have some emulation in place for ERETA[AB], we can
plug it into the exception handling machinery.
As for a bare ERET, an "easy" ERETAx instruction is processed as
a fixup, while something that requires a translation regime
transition or an exception delivery is left to the slow path.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 13 +++++++++++--
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
index 63a74c0330f1..6fc3b7580b24 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
@@ -2172,7 +2172,7 @@ static u64 kvm_check_illegal_exception_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 spsr)
void kvm_emulate_nested_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- u64 spsr, elr;
+ u64 spsr, elr, esr;
/*
* Forward this trap to the virtual EL2 if the virtual
@@ -2181,12 +2181,30 @@ void kvm_emulate_nested_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (forward_traps(vcpu, HCR_NV))
return;
+ /* Check for an ERETAx */
+ esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
+ if ((esr & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA) && !kvm_auth_eretax(vcpu, &elr)) {
+ /*
+ * Oh no, ERETAx failed to authenticate. If we have
+ * FPACCOMBINE, deliver an exception right away. If we
+ * don't, then let the mangled ELR value trickle down the
+ * ERET handling, and the guest will have a little surprise.
+ */
+ if (kvm_has_pauth(vcpu->kvm, FPACCOMBINE)) {
+ esr &= ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETAB;
+ esr |= FIELD_PREP(ESR_ELx_EC_MASK, ESR_ELx_EC_FPAC);
+ kvm_inject_nested_sync(vcpu, esr);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
preempt_disable();
kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu);
spsr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SPSR_EL2);
spsr = kvm_check_illegal_exception_return(vcpu, spsr);
- elr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ELR_EL2);
+ if (!(esr & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA))
+ elr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ELR_EL2);
trace_kvm_nested_eret(vcpu, elr, spsr);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 556af771a9e9..998838da7c32 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ static int kvm_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int kvm_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- if (kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA)
+ if ((kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA) &&
+ !vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
return kvm_handle_ptrauth(vcpu);
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index a6c61d2ffc35..04592cd56e4b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_put_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static bool kvm_hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
{
- u64 spsr, mode;
+ u64 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
+ u64 spsr, elr, mode;
/*
* Going through the whole put/load motions is a waste of time
@@ -241,10 +242,18 @@ static bool kvm_hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
return false;
}
+ /* If ERETAx fails, take the slow path */
+ if (esr & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA) {
+ if (!(vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) && kvm_auth_eretax(vcpu, &elr)))
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ elr = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ELR);
+ }
+
spsr = (spsr & ~(PSR_MODE_MASK | PSR_MODE32_BIT)) | mode;
write_sysreg_el2(spsr, SYS_SPSR);
- write_sysreg_el2(read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ELR), SYS_ELR);
+ write_sysreg_el2(elr, SYS_ELR);
return true;
}
--
2.39.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle ERETA[AB] instructions
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:20:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240219092014.783809-13-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240219092014.783809-1-maz@kernel.org>
Now that we have some emulation in place for ERETA[AB], we can
plug it into the exception handling machinery.
As for a bare ERET, an "easy" ERETAx instruction is processed as
a fixup, while something that requires a translation regime
transition or an exception delivery is left to the slow path.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 13 +++++++++++--
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
index 63a74c0330f1..6fc3b7580b24 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/emulate-nested.c
@@ -2172,7 +2172,7 @@ static u64 kvm_check_illegal_exception_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 spsr)
void kvm_emulate_nested_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- u64 spsr, elr;
+ u64 spsr, elr, esr;
/*
* Forward this trap to the virtual EL2 if the virtual
@@ -2181,12 +2181,30 @@ void kvm_emulate_nested_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (forward_traps(vcpu, HCR_NV))
return;
+ /* Check for an ERETAx */
+ esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
+ if ((esr & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA) && !kvm_auth_eretax(vcpu, &elr)) {
+ /*
+ * Oh no, ERETAx failed to authenticate. If we have
+ * FPACCOMBINE, deliver an exception right away. If we
+ * don't, then let the mangled ELR value trickle down the
+ * ERET handling, and the guest will have a little surprise.
+ */
+ if (kvm_has_pauth(vcpu->kvm, FPACCOMBINE)) {
+ esr &= ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETAB;
+ esr |= FIELD_PREP(ESR_ELx_EC_MASK, ESR_ELx_EC_FPAC);
+ kvm_inject_nested_sync(vcpu, esr);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
preempt_disable();
kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu);
spsr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SPSR_EL2);
spsr = kvm_check_illegal_exception_return(vcpu, spsr);
- elr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ELR_EL2);
+ if (!(esr & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA))
+ elr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ELR_EL2);
trace_kvm_nested_eret(vcpu, elr, spsr);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 556af771a9e9..998838da7c32 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ static int kvm_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int kvm_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- if (kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA)
+ if ((kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA) &&
+ !vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
return kvm_handle_ptrauth(vcpu);
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index a6c61d2ffc35..04592cd56e4b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_put_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static bool kvm_hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
{
- u64 spsr, mode;
+ u64 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
+ u64 spsr, elr, mode;
/*
* Going through the whole put/load motions is a waste of time
@@ -241,10 +242,18 @@ static bool kvm_hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
return false;
}
+ /* If ERETAx fails, take the slow path */
+ if (esr & ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERETA) {
+ if (!(vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) && kvm_auth_eretax(vcpu, &elr)))
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ elr = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ELR);
+ }
+
spsr = (spsr & ~(PSR_MODE_MASK | PSR_MODE32_BIT)) | mode;
write_sysreg_el2(spsr, SYS_SPSR);
- write_sysreg_el2(read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ELR), SYS_ELR);
+ write_sysreg_el2(elr, SYS_ELR);
return true;
}
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-19 9:20 [PATCH 00/13] KVM/arm64: Add NV support for ERET and PAuth Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 01/13] KVM: arm64: Harden __ctxt_sys_reg() against out-of-range values Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 11:20 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 11:20 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 11:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 11:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 13:17 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 13:17 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: arm64: Clarify ESR_ELx_ERET_ISS_ERET* Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 11:31 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 11:31 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 12:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 12:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 13:23 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 13:23 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 13:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 13:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 15:18 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 15:18 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Drop VCPU_HYP_CONTEXT flag Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 11:58 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 11:58 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 04/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Configure HCR_EL2 for FEAT_NV2 Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 15:16 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 15:16 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-20 15:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 15:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 05/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Add trap forwarding for ERET and SMC Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-22 11:05 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-22 11:05 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 06/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track 'InHost' exception returns Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 07/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Honor HFGITR_EL2.ERET being set Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 08/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.{API,APK} independantly Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 09/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Reinject PAC exceptions caused by HCR_EL2.API==0 Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 10/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Add kvm_has_pauth() helper Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 11/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Add emulation for ERETAx instructions Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle ERETA[AB] instructions Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Advertise support for PAuth Marc Zyngier
2024-02-19 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240219092014.783809-13-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.