[merged mm-stable] xarray-add-cmpxchg-order-test.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged mm-stable] xarray-add-cmpxchg-order-test.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: XArray: add cmpxchg order test
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     xarray-add-cmpxchg-order-test.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>
Subject: XArray: add cmpxchg order test
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:51:25 -0800

XArray multi-index entries do not keep track of the order stored once the
entry is being marked as used with cmpxchg (conditionally replaced with
NULL).  Add a test to check the order is actually lost.  The test also
verifies the order and entries for all the tied indexes before and after
the NULL replacement with xa_cmpxchg.

Add another entry at 1 << order that keeps the node around and the order
information for the NULL-entry after xa_cmpxchg.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-3-mcgrof@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 lib/test_xarray.c |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)

--- a/lib/test_xarray.c~xarray-add-cmpxchg-order-test
+++ a/lib/test_xarray.c
@@ -423,6 +423,59 @@ static noinline void check_cmpxchg(struc
 	XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
 }
 
+static noinline void check_cmpxchg_order(struct xarray *xa)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
+	void *FIVE = xa_mk_value(5);
+	unsigned int i, order = 3;
+
+	XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_order(xa, 0, order, FIVE, GFP_KERNEL));
+
+	/* Check entry FIVE has the order saved */
+	XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, xa_to_value(FIVE)) != order);
+
+	/* Check all the tied indexes have the same entry and order */
+	for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
+		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i) != FIVE);
+		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != order);
+	}
+
+	/* Ensure that nothing is stored at index '1 << order' */
+	XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 1 << order) != NULL);
+
+	/*
+	 * Additionally, keep the node information and the order at
+	 * '1 << order'
+	 */
+	XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_order(xa, 1 << order, order, FIVE, GFP_KERNEL));
+	for (i = (1 << order); i < (1 << order) + (1 << order) - 1; i++) {
+		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i) != FIVE);
+		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != order);
+	}
+
+	/* Conditionally replace FIVE entry at index '0' with NULL */
+	XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 0, FIVE, NULL, GFP_KERNEL) != FIVE);
+
+	/* Verify the order is lost at FIVE (and old) entries */
+	XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, xa_to_value(FIVE)) != 0);
+
+	/* Verify the order and entries are lost in all the tied indexes */
+	for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
+		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i) != NULL);
+		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != 0);
+	}
+
+	/* Verify node and order are kept at '1 << order' */
+	for (i = (1 << order); i < (1 << order) + (1 << order) - 1; i++) {
+		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i) != FIVE);
+		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != order);
+	}
+
+	xa_store_order(xa, 0, BITS_PER_LONG - 1, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
+	XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
+#endif
+}
+
 static noinline void check_reserve(struct xarray *xa)
 {
 	void *entry;
@@ -1976,6 +2029,7 @@ static int xarray_checks(void)
 	check_xas_erase(&array);
 	check_insert(&array);
 	check_cmpxchg(&array);
+	check_cmpxchg_order(&array);
 	check_reserve(&array);
 	check_reserve(&xa0);
 	check_multi_store(&array);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from da.gomez@samsung.com are