All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/15] drivers/perf: riscv: Implement SBI PMU snapshot function
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:40:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301-9587f1bcaa6b25b1dcc7062e@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229010130.1380926-6-atishp@rivosinc.com>

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:01:20PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> SBI v2.0 SBI introduced PMU snapshot feature which adds the following
> features.
> 
> 1. Read counter values directly from the shared memory instead of
> csr read.
> 2. Start multiple counters with initial values with one SBI call.
> 
> These functionalities optimizes the number of traps to the higher
> privilege mode. If the kernel is in VS mode while the hypervisor
> deploy trap & emulate method, this would minimize all the hpmcounter
> CSR read traps. If the kernel is running in S-mode, the benefits
> reduced to CSR latency vs DRAM/cache latency as there is no trap
> involved while accessing the hpmcounter CSRs.
> 
> In both modes, it does saves the number of ecalls while starting
> multiple counter together with an initial values. This is a likely
> scenario if multiple counters overflow at the same time.
> 
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c       |   1 +
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c   | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h |   6 +
>  3 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c
> index 0dda70e1ef90..5b57acb770d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ struct riscv_pmu *riscv_pmu_alloc(void)
>  		cpuc->n_events = 0;
>  		for (i = 0; i < RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
>  			cpuc->events[i] = NULL;
> +		cpuc->snapshot_addr = NULL;
>  	}
>  	pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
>  		.event_init	= riscv_pmu_event_init,
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index ea0fdb589f0d..8de5721e8019 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-47");
>  PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(firmware, "config:63");
>  
>  static bool sbi_v2_available;
> +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sbi_pmu_snapshot_available);
> +#define sbi_pmu_snapshot_available() \
> +	static_branch_unlikely(&sbi_pmu_snapshot_available)
>  
>  static struct attribute *riscv_arch_formats_attr[] = {
>  	&format_attr_event.attr,
> @@ -485,14 +488,100 @@ static int pmu_sbi_event_map(struct perf_event *event, u64 *econfig)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void pmu_sbi_snapshot_free(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events, cpu);
> +
> +		if (!cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		free_page((unsigned long)cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr);
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr = NULL;
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys = 0;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int pmu_sbi_snapshot_alloc(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +	struct page *snapshot_page;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events, cpu);
> +
> +		if (cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		snapshot_page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO);
> +		if (!snapshot_page) {
> +			pmu_sbi_snapshot_free(pmu);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr = page_to_virt(snapshot_page);
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys = page_to_phys(snapshot_page);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void pmu_sbi_snapshot_disable(void)
> +{
> +	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM, -1,
> +		  -1, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int pmu_sbi_snapshot_setup(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt;
> +	struct sbiret ret = {0};
> +
> +	cpu_hw_evt = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events, cpu);
> +	if (!cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_set_done)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> +		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM,
> +				cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys,
> +				(u64)(cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys) >> 32, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +	else
> +		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM,
> +				cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +
> +	/* Free up the snapshot area memory and fall back to SBI PMU calls without snapshot */
> +	if (ret.error) {
> +		if (ret.error != SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> +			pr_warn("pmu snapshot setup failed with error %ld\n", ret.error);
> +		return sbi_err_map_linux_errno(ret.error);
> +	}
> +
> +	cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_set_done = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static u64 pmu_sbi_ctr_read(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>  	int idx = hwc->idx;
>  	struct sbiret ret;
>  	u64 val = 0;
> +	struct riscv_pmu *pmu = to_riscv_pmu(event->pmu);
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
>  	union sbi_pmu_ctr_info info = pmu_ctr_list[idx];
>  
> +	/* Read the value from the shared memory directly */
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available()) {
> +		val = sdata->ctr_values[idx];
> +		return val;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (pmu_sbi_is_fw_event(event)) {
>  		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_FW_READ,
>  				hwc->idx, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> @@ -539,6 +628,7 @@ static void pmu_sbi_ctr_start(struct perf_event *event, u64 ival)
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>  	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE;
>  
> +	/* There is no benefit setting SNAPSHOT FLAG for a single counter */
>  #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
>  	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, hwc->idx,
>  			1, flag, ival, ival >> 32, 0);
> @@ -559,16 +649,36 @@ static void pmu_sbi_ctr_stop(struct perf_event *event, unsigned long flag)
>  {
>  	struct sbiret ret;
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> +	struct riscv_pmu *pmu = to_riscv_pmu(event->pmu);
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
>  
>  	if ((hwc->flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_ACCESS) &&
>  	    (hwc->flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT))
>  		pmu_sbi_reset_scounteren((void *)event);
>  
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		flag |= SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT;
> +
>  	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, hwc->idx, 1, flag, 0, 0, 0);
> -	if (ret.error && (ret.error != SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STOPPED) &&
> -		flag != SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET)
> +	if (!ret.error && sbi_pmu_snapshot_available()) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The counter snapshot is based on the index base specified by hwc->idx.
> +		 * The actual counter value is updated in shared memory at index 0 when counter
> +		 * mask is 0x01. To ensure accurate counter values, it's necessary to transfer
> +		 * the counter value to shared memory. However, if hwc->idx is zero, the counter
> +		 * value is already correctly updated in shared memory, requiring no further
> +		 * adjustment.
> +		 */
> +		if (hwc->idx > 0) {
> +			sdata->ctr_values[hwc->idx] = sdata->ctr_values[0];
> +			sdata->ctr_values[0] = 0;
> +		}
> +	} else if (ret.error && (ret.error != SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STOPPED) &&
> +		flag != SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET) {
>  		pr_err("Stopping counter idx %d failed with error %d\n",
>  			hwc->idx, sbi_err_map_linux_errno(ret.error));
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int pmu_sbi_find_num_ctrs(void)
> @@ -626,10 +736,14 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>  static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>  {
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +	unsigned long flag = 0;
> +
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		flag = SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT;
>  
>  	/* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */
>  	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, 0,
> -		  cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +		  cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], flag, 0, 0, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -638,11 +752,10 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>   * while the overflowed counters need to be started with updated initialization
>   * value.
>   */
> -static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
> -					       unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +static noinline void pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_sbi(struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt,
> +						unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
>  {
>  	int idx = 0;
> -	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
>  	struct perf_event *event;
>  	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE;
>  	unsigned long ctr_start_mask = 0;
> @@ -677,6 +790,49 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static noinline void pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_snapshot(struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt,
> +						     unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +{
> +	int idx = 0;
> +	struct perf_event *event;
> +	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_FROM_SNAPSHOT;
> +	u64 max_period, init_val = 0;
> +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
> +	unsigned long ctr_start_mask = 0;
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(idx, cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS) {
> +		if (ctr_ovf_mask & (1 << idx)) {

nit: BIT(idx)

> +			event = cpu_hw_evt->events[idx];
> +			hwc = &event->hw;
> +			max_period = riscv_pmu_ctr_get_width_mask(event);
> +			init_val = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count) & max_period;
> +			sdata->ctr_values[idx] = init_val;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		 * We donot need to update the non-overflow counters the previous

do not

> +		 * value should have been there already.
> +		 */
> +	}
> +
> +	ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0];
> +
> +	/* Start all the counters in a single shot */
> +	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, 0, ctr_start_mask,
> +		  flag, 0, 0, 0);

I think we should always loop over all words of used_hw_ctrs[] since it'll
have more than one for riscv32. Hmm, it seems like there are several
places where we don't expect riscv32's second word to be used...

> +}
> +
> +static void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
> +					unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_snapshot(cpu_hw_evt, ctr_ovf_mask);
> +	else
> +		pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_sbi(cpu_hw_evt, ctr_ovf_mask);
> +}
> +
>  static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>  {
>  	struct perf_sample_data data;
> @@ -690,6 +846,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>  	unsigned long overflowed_ctrs = 0;
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = dev;
>  	u64 start_clock = sched_clock();
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpu_hw_evt))
>  		return IRQ_NONE;
> @@ -711,8 +868,10 @@ static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>  	pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(pmu);
>  
>  	/* Overflow status register should only be read after counter are stopped */
> -	ALT_SBI_PMU_OVERFLOW(overflow);
> -
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		overflow = sdata->ctr_overflow_mask;
> +	else
> +		ALT_SBI_PMU_OVERFLOW(overflow);
>  	/*
>  	 * Overflow interrupt pending bit should only be cleared after stopping
>  	 * all the counters to avoid any race condition.
> @@ -794,6 +953,9 @@ static int pmu_sbi_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>  		enable_percpu_irq(riscv_pmu_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		return pmu_sbi_snapshot_setup(pmu, cpu);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -807,6 +969,9 @@ static int pmu_sbi_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>  	/* Disable all counters access for user mode now */
>  	csr_write(CSR_SCOUNTEREN, 0x0);
>  
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		pmu_sbi_snapshot_disable();
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1076,10 +1241,6 @@ static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pmu->event_unmapped = pmu_sbi_event_unmapped;
>  	pmu->csr_index = pmu_sbi_csr_index;
>  
> -	ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance(CPUHP_AP_PERF_RISCV_STARTING, &pmu->node);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
>  	ret = riscv_pm_pmu_register(pmu);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_unregister;
> @@ -1088,8 +1249,32 @@ static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_unregister;
>  
> +	/* SBI PMU Snapsphot is only available in SBI v2.0 */
> +	if (sbi_v2_available) {
> +		ret = pmu_sbi_snapshot_alloc(pmu);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out_unregister;
> +
> +		ret = pmu_sbi_snapshot_setup(pmu, smp_processor_id());
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			pr_info("SBI PMU snapshot detected\n");
> +			/*
> +			 * We enable it once here for the boot cpu. If snapshot shmem setup
> +			 * fails during cpu hotplug process, it will fail to start the cpu
> +			 * as we can not handle hetergenous PMUs with different snapshot
> +			 * capability.
> +			 */
> +			static_branch_enable(&sbi_pmu_snapshot_available);
> +		}
> +		/* Snapshot is an optional feature. Continue if not available */
> +	}
> +
>  	register_sysctl("kernel", sbi_pmu_sysctl_table);
>  
> +	ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance(CPUHP_AP_PERF_RISCV_STARTING, &pmu->node);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_unregister:
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> index 43282e22ebe1..c3fa90970042 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(used_hw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
>  	/* currently enabled firmware counters */
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(used_fw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
> +	/* The virtual address of the shared memory where counter snapshot will be taken */
> +	void *snapshot_addr;
> +	/* The physical address of the shared memory where counter snapshot will be taken */
> +	phys_addr_t snapshot_addr_phys;
> +	/* Boolean flag to indicate setup is already done */
> +	bool snapshot_set_done;

Instead of the 'snapshot_set_done' boolean, we can just use
snapshot_addr, which can't be NULL after setup.

>  };
>  
>  struct riscv_pmu {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Thanks,
drew


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	 Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	 Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	 Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>,
	 kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] drivers/perf: riscv: Implement SBI PMU snapshot function
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:40:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301-9587f1bcaa6b25b1dcc7062e@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229010130.1380926-6-atishp@rivosinc.com>

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:01:20PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> SBI v2.0 SBI introduced PMU snapshot feature which adds the following
> features.
> 
> 1. Read counter values directly from the shared memory instead of
> csr read.
> 2. Start multiple counters with initial values with one SBI call.
> 
> These functionalities optimizes the number of traps to the higher
> privilege mode. If the kernel is in VS mode while the hypervisor
> deploy trap & emulate method, this would minimize all the hpmcounter
> CSR read traps. If the kernel is running in S-mode, the benefits
> reduced to CSR latency vs DRAM/cache latency as there is no trap
> involved while accessing the hpmcounter CSRs.
> 
> In both modes, it does saves the number of ecalls while starting
> multiple counter together with an initial values. This is a likely
> scenario if multiple counters overflow at the same time.
> 
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c       |   1 +
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c   | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h |   6 +
>  3 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c
> index 0dda70e1ef90..5b57acb770d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ struct riscv_pmu *riscv_pmu_alloc(void)
>  		cpuc->n_events = 0;
>  		for (i = 0; i < RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
>  			cpuc->events[i] = NULL;
> +		cpuc->snapshot_addr = NULL;
>  	}
>  	pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
>  		.event_init	= riscv_pmu_event_init,
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index ea0fdb589f0d..8de5721e8019 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-47");
>  PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(firmware, "config:63");
>  
>  static bool sbi_v2_available;
> +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sbi_pmu_snapshot_available);
> +#define sbi_pmu_snapshot_available() \
> +	static_branch_unlikely(&sbi_pmu_snapshot_available)
>  
>  static struct attribute *riscv_arch_formats_attr[] = {
>  	&format_attr_event.attr,
> @@ -485,14 +488,100 @@ static int pmu_sbi_event_map(struct perf_event *event, u64 *econfig)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void pmu_sbi_snapshot_free(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events, cpu);
> +
> +		if (!cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		free_page((unsigned long)cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr);
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr = NULL;
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys = 0;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int pmu_sbi_snapshot_alloc(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +	struct page *snapshot_page;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events, cpu);
> +
> +		if (cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		snapshot_page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO);
> +		if (!snapshot_page) {
> +			pmu_sbi_snapshot_free(pmu);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr = page_to_virt(snapshot_page);
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys = page_to_phys(snapshot_page);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void pmu_sbi_snapshot_disable(void)
> +{
> +	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM, -1,
> +		  -1, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int pmu_sbi_snapshot_setup(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt;
> +	struct sbiret ret = {0};
> +
> +	cpu_hw_evt = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events, cpu);
> +	if (!cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_set_done)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> +		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM,
> +				cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys,
> +				(u64)(cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys) >> 32, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +	else
> +		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM,
> +				cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +
> +	/* Free up the snapshot area memory and fall back to SBI PMU calls without snapshot */
> +	if (ret.error) {
> +		if (ret.error != SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> +			pr_warn("pmu snapshot setup failed with error %ld\n", ret.error);
> +		return sbi_err_map_linux_errno(ret.error);
> +	}
> +
> +	cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_set_done = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static u64 pmu_sbi_ctr_read(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>  	int idx = hwc->idx;
>  	struct sbiret ret;
>  	u64 val = 0;
> +	struct riscv_pmu *pmu = to_riscv_pmu(event->pmu);
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
>  	union sbi_pmu_ctr_info info = pmu_ctr_list[idx];
>  
> +	/* Read the value from the shared memory directly */
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available()) {
> +		val = sdata->ctr_values[idx];
> +		return val;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (pmu_sbi_is_fw_event(event)) {
>  		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_FW_READ,
>  				hwc->idx, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> @@ -539,6 +628,7 @@ static void pmu_sbi_ctr_start(struct perf_event *event, u64 ival)
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>  	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE;
>  
> +	/* There is no benefit setting SNAPSHOT FLAG for a single counter */
>  #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
>  	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, hwc->idx,
>  			1, flag, ival, ival >> 32, 0);
> @@ -559,16 +649,36 @@ static void pmu_sbi_ctr_stop(struct perf_event *event, unsigned long flag)
>  {
>  	struct sbiret ret;
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> +	struct riscv_pmu *pmu = to_riscv_pmu(event->pmu);
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
>  
>  	if ((hwc->flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_ACCESS) &&
>  	    (hwc->flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT))
>  		pmu_sbi_reset_scounteren((void *)event);
>  
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		flag |= SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT;
> +
>  	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, hwc->idx, 1, flag, 0, 0, 0);
> -	if (ret.error && (ret.error != SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STOPPED) &&
> -		flag != SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET)
> +	if (!ret.error && sbi_pmu_snapshot_available()) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The counter snapshot is based on the index base specified by hwc->idx.
> +		 * The actual counter value is updated in shared memory at index 0 when counter
> +		 * mask is 0x01. To ensure accurate counter values, it's necessary to transfer
> +		 * the counter value to shared memory. However, if hwc->idx is zero, the counter
> +		 * value is already correctly updated in shared memory, requiring no further
> +		 * adjustment.
> +		 */
> +		if (hwc->idx > 0) {
> +			sdata->ctr_values[hwc->idx] = sdata->ctr_values[0];
> +			sdata->ctr_values[0] = 0;
> +		}
> +	} else if (ret.error && (ret.error != SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STOPPED) &&
> +		flag != SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET) {
>  		pr_err("Stopping counter idx %d failed with error %d\n",
>  			hwc->idx, sbi_err_map_linux_errno(ret.error));
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int pmu_sbi_find_num_ctrs(void)
> @@ -626,10 +736,14 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>  static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>  {
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +	unsigned long flag = 0;
> +
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		flag = SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT;
>  
>  	/* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */
>  	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, 0,
> -		  cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +		  cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], flag, 0, 0, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -638,11 +752,10 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>   * while the overflowed counters need to be started with updated initialization
>   * value.
>   */
> -static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
> -					       unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +static noinline void pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_sbi(struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt,
> +						unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
>  {
>  	int idx = 0;
> -	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
>  	struct perf_event *event;
>  	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE;
>  	unsigned long ctr_start_mask = 0;
> @@ -677,6 +790,49 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static noinline void pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_snapshot(struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt,
> +						     unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +{
> +	int idx = 0;
> +	struct perf_event *event;
> +	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_FROM_SNAPSHOT;
> +	u64 max_period, init_val = 0;
> +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
> +	unsigned long ctr_start_mask = 0;
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(idx, cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS) {
> +		if (ctr_ovf_mask & (1 << idx)) {

nit: BIT(idx)

> +			event = cpu_hw_evt->events[idx];
> +			hwc = &event->hw;
> +			max_period = riscv_pmu_ctr_get_width_mask(event);
> +			init_val = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count) & max_period;
> +			sdata->ctr_values[idx] = init_val;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		 * We donot need to update the non-overflow counters the previous

do not

> +		 * value should have been there already.
> +		 */
> +	}
> +
> +	ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0];
> +
> +	/* Start all the counters in a single shot */
> +	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, 0, ctr_start_mask,
> +		  flag, 0, 0, 0);

I think we should always loop over all words of used_hw_ctrs[] since it'll
have more than one for riscv32. Hmm, it seems like there are several
places where we don't expect riscv32's second word to be used...

> +}
> +
> +static void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
> +					unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_snapshot(cpu_hw_evt, ctr_ovf_mask);
> +	else
> +		pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_sbi(cpu_hw_evt, ctr_ovf_mask);
> +}
> +
>  static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>  {
>  	struct perf_sample_data data;
> @@ -690,6 +846,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>  	unsigned long overflowed_ctrs = 0;
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = dev;
>  	u64 start_clock = sched_clock();
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpu_hw_evt))
>  		return IRQ_NONE;
> @@ -711,8 +868,10 @@ static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>  	pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(pmu);
>  
>  	/* Overflow status register should only be read after counter are stopped */
> -	ALT_SBI_PMU_OVERFLOW(overflow);
> -
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		overflow = sdata->ctr_overflow_mask;
> +	else
> +		ALT_SBI_PMU_OVERFLOW(overflow);
>  	/*
>  	 * Overflow interrupt pending bit should only be cleared after stopping
>  	 * all the counters to avoid any race condition.
> @@ -794,6 +953,9 @@ static int pmu_sbi_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>  		enable_percpu_irq(riscv_pmu_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		return pmu_sbi_snapshot_setup(pmu, cpu);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -807,6 +969,9 @@ static int pmu_sbi_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>  	/* Disable all counters access for user mode now */
>  	csr_write(CSR_SCOUNTEREN, 0x0);
>  
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		pmu_sbi_snapshot_disable();
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1076,10 +1241,6 @@ static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pmu->event_unmapped = pmu_sbi_event_unmapped;
>  	pmu->csr_index = pmu_sbi_csr_index;
>  
> -	ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance(CPUHP_AP_PERF_RISCV_STARTING, &pmu->node);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
>  	ret = riscv_pm_pmu_register(pmu);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_unregister;
> @@ -1088,8 +1249,32 @@ static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_unregister;
>  
> +	/* SBI PMU Snapsphot is only available in SBI v2.0 */
> +	if (sbi_v2_available) {
> +		ret = pmu_sbi_snapshot_alloc(pmu);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out_unregister;
> +
> +		ret = pmu_sbi_snapshot_setup(pmu, smp_processor_id());
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			pr_info("SBI PMU snapshot detected\n");
> +			/*
> +			 * We enable it once here for the boot cpu. If snapshot shmem setup
> +			 * fails during cpu hotplug process, it will fail to start the cpu
> +			 * as we can not handle hetergenous PMUs with different snapshot
> +			 * capability.
> +			 */
> +			static_branch_enable(&sbi_pmu_snapshot_available);
> +		}
> +		/* Snapshot is an optional feature. Continue if not available */
> +	}
> +
>  	register_sysctl("kernel", sbi_pmu_sysctl_table);
>  
> +	ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance(CPUHP_AP_PERF_RISCV_STARTING, &pmu->node);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_unregister:
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> index 43282e22ebe1..c3fa90970042 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(used_hw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
>  	/* currently enabled firmware counters */
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(used_fw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
> +	/* The virtual address of the shared memory where counter snapshot will be taken */
> +	void *snapshot_addr;
> +	/* The physical address of the shared memory where counter snapshot will be taken */
> +	phys_addr_t snapshot_addr_phys;
> +	/* Boolean flag to indicate setup is already done */
> +	bool snapshot_set_done;

Instead of the 'snapshot_set_done' boolean, we can just use
snapshot_addr, which can't be NULL after setup.

>  };
>  
>  struct riscv_pmu {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Thanks,
drew

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] drivers/perf: riscv: Implement SBI PMU snapshot function
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:40:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301-9587f1bcaa6b25b1dcc7062e@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229010130.1380926-6-atishp@rivosinc.com>

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:01:20PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> SBI v2.0 SBI introduced PMU snapshot feature which adds the following
> features.
> 
> 1. Read counter values directly from the shared memory instead of
> csr read.
> 2. Start multiple counters with initial values with one SBI call.
> 
> These functionalities optimizes the number of traps to the higher
> privilege mode. If the kernel is in VS mode while the hypervisor
> deploy trap & emulate method, this would minimize all the hpmcounter
> CSR read traps. If the kernel is running in S-mode, the benefits
> reduced to CSR latency vs DRAM/cache latency as there is no trap
> involved while accessing the hpmcounter CSRs.
> 
> In both modes, it does saves the number of ecalls while starting
> multiple counter together with an initial values. This is a likely
> scenario if multiple counters overflow at the same time.
> 
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c       |   1 +
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c   | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h |   6 +
>  3 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c
> index 0dda70e1ef90..5b57acb770d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ struct riscv_pmu *riscv_pmu_alloc(void)
>  		cpuc->n_events = 0;
>  		for (i = 0; i < RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
>  			cpuc->events[i] = NULL;
> +		cpuc->snapshot_addr = NULL;
>  	}
>  	pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
>  		.event_init	= riscv_pmu_event_init,
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index ea0fdb589f0d..8de5721e8019 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-47");
>  PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(firmware, "config:63");
>  
>  static bool sbi_v2_available;
> +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sbi_pmu_snapshot_available);
> +#define sbi_pmu_snapshot_available() \
> +	static_branch_unlikely(&sbi_pmu_snapshot_available)
>  
>  static struct attribute *riscv_arch_formats_attr[] = {
>  	&format_attr_event.attr,
> @@ -485,14 +488,100 @@ static int pmu_sbi_event_map(struct perf_event *event, u64 *econfig)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void pmu_sbi_snapshot_free(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events, cpu);
> +
> +		if (!cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		free_page((unsigned long)cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr);
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr = NULL;
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys = 0;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int pmu_sbi_snapshot_alloc(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +	struct page *snapshot_page;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events, cpu);
> +
> +		if (cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		snapshot_page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO);
> +		if (!snapshot_page) {
> +			pmu_sbi_snapshot_free(pmu);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr = page_to_virt(snapshot_page);
> +		cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys = page_to_phys(snapshot_page);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void pmu_sbi_snapshot_disable(void)
> +{
> +	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM, -1,
> +		  -1, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int pmu_sbi_snapshot_setup(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt;
> +	struct sbiret ret = {0};
> +
> +	cpu_hw_evt = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events, cpu);
> +	if (!cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_set_done)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> +		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM,
> +				cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys,
> +				(u64)(cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys) >> 32, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +	else
> +		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM,
> +				cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr_phys, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +
> +	/* Free up the snapshot area memory and fall back to SBI PMU calls without snapshot */
> +	if (ret.error) {
> +		if (ret.error != SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> +			pr_warn("pmu snapshot setup failed with error %ld\n", ret.error);
> +		return sbi_err_map_linux_errno(ret.error);
> +	}
> +
> +	cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_set_done = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static u64 pmu_sbi_ctr_read(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>  	int idx = hwc->idx;
>  	struct sbiret ret;
>  	u64 val = 0;
> +	struct riscv_pmu *pmu = to_riscv_pmu(event->pmu);
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
>  	union sbi_pmu_ctr_info info = pmu_ctr_list[idx];
>  
> +	/* Read the value from the shared memory directly */
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available()) {
> +		val = sdata->ctr_values[idx];
> +		return val;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (pmu_sbi_is_fw_event(event)) {
>  		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_FW_READ,
>  				hwc->idx, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> @@ -539,6 +628,7 @@ static void pmu_sbi_ctr_start(struct perf_event *event, u64 ival)
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>  	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE;
>  
> +	/* There is no benefit setting SNAPSHOT FLAG for a single counter */
>  #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
>  	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, hwc->idx,
>  			1, flag, ival, ival >> 32, 0);
> @@ -559,16 +649,36 @@ static void pmu_sbi_ctr_stop(struct perf_event *event, unsigned long flag)
>  {
>  	struct sbiret ret;
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> +	struct riscv_pmu *pmu = to_riscv_pmu(event->pmu);
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
>  
>  	if ((hwc->flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_ACCESS) &&
>  	    (hwc->flags & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT))
>  		pmu_sbi_reset_scounteren((void *)event);
>  
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		flag |= SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT;
> +
>  	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, hwc->idx, 1, flag, 0, 0, 0);
> -	if (ret.error && (ret.error != SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STOPPED) &&
> -		flag != SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET)
> +	if (!ret.error && sbi_pmu_snapshot_available()) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The counter snapshot is based on the index base specified by hwc->idx.
> +		 * The actual counter value is updated in shared memory at index 0 when counter
> +		 * mask is 0x01. To ensure accurate counter values, it's necessary to transfer
> +		 * the counter value to shared memory. However, if hwc->idx is zero, the counter
> +		 * value is already correctly updated in shared memory, requiring no further
> +		 * adjustment.
> +		 */
> +		if (hwc->idx > 0) {
> +			sdata->ctr_values[hwc->idx] = sdata->ctr_values[0];
> +			sdata->ctr_values[0] = 0;
> +		}
> +	} else if (ret.error && (ret.error != SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STOPPED) &&
> +		flag != SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_RESET) {
>  		pr_err("Stopping counter idx %d failed with error %d\n",
>  			hwc->idx, sbi_err_map_linux_errno(ret.error));
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int pmu_sbi_find_num_ctrs(void)
> @@ -626,10 +736,14 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>  static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>  {
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +	unsigned long flag = 0;
> +
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		flag = SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT;
>  
>  	/* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */
>  	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, 0,
> -		  cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +		  cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], flag, 0, 0, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -638,11 +752,10 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
>   * while the overflowed counters need to be started with updated initialization
>   * value.
>   */
> -static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
> -					       unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +static noinline void pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_sbi(struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt,
> +						unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
>  {
>  	int idx = 0;
> -	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
>  	struct perf_event *event;
>  	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE;
>  	unsigned long ctr_start_mask = 0;
> @@ -677,6 +790,49 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static noinline void pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_snapshot(struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt,
> +						     unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +{
> +	int idx = 0;
> +	struct perf_event *event;
> +	unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_FROM_SNAPSHOT;
> +	u64 max_period, init_val = 0;
> +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
> +	unsigned long ctr_start_mask = 0;
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(idx, cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS) {
> +		if (ctr_ovf_mask & (1 << idx)) {

nit: BIT(idx)

> +			event = cpu_hw_evt->events[idx];
> +			hwc = &event->hw;
> +			max_period = riscv_pmu_ctr_get_width_mask(event);
> +			init_val = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count) & max_period;
> +			sdata->ctr_values[idx] = init_val;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		 * We donot need to update the non-overflow counters the previous

do not

> +		 * value should have been there already.
> +		 */
> +	}
> +
> +	ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0];
> +
> +	/* Start all the counters in a single shot */
> +	sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, 0, ctr_start_mask,
> +		  flag, 0, 0, 0);

I think we should always loop over all words of used_hw_ctrs[] since it'll
have more than one for riscv32. Hmm, it seems like there are several
places where we don't expect riscv32's second word to be used...

> +}
> +
> +static void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
> +					unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events);
> +
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_snapshot(cpu_hw_evt, ctr_ovf_mask);
> +	else
> +		pmu_sbi_start_ovf_ctrs_sbi(cpu_hw_evt, ctr_ovf_mask);
> +}
> +
>  static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>  {
>  	struct perf_sample_data data;
> @@ -690,6 +846,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>  	unsigned long overflowed_ctrs = 0;
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = dev;
>  	u64 start_clock = sched_clock();
> +	struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *sdata = cpu_hw_evt->snapshot_addr;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpu_hw_evt))
>  		return IRQ_NONE;
> @@ -711,8 +868,10 @@ static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
>  	pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(pmu);
>  
>  	/* Overflow status register should only be read after counter are stopped */
> -	ALT_SBI_PMU_OVERFLOW(overflow);
> -
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		overflow = sdata->ctr_overflow_mask;
> +	else
> +		ALT_SBI_PMU_OVERFLOW(overflow);
>  	/*
>  	 * Overflow interrupt pending bit should only be cleared after stopping
>  	 * all the counters to avoid any race condition.
> @@ -794,6 +953,9 @@ static int pmu_sbi_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>  		enable_percpu_irq(riscv_pmu_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		return pmu_sbi_snapshot_setup(pmu, cpu);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -807,6 +969,9 @@ static int pmu_sbi_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>  	/* Disable all counters access for user mode now */
>  	csr_write(CSR_SCOUNTEREN, 0x0);
>  
> +	if (sbi_pmu_snapshot_available())
> +		pmu_sbi_snapshot_disable();
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1076,10 +1241,6 @@ static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pmu->event_unmapped = pmu_sbi_event_unmapped;
>  	pmu->csr_index = pmu_sbi_csr_index;
>  
> -	ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance(CPUHP_AP_PERF_RISCV_STARTING, &pmu->node);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
>  	ret = riscv_pm_pmu_register(pmu);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_unregister;
> @@ -1088,8 +1249,32 @@ static int pmu_sbi_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_unregister;
>  
> +	/* SBI PMU Snapsphot is only available in SBI v2.0 */
> +	if (sbi_v2_available) {
> +		ret = pmu_sbi_snapshot_alloc(pmu);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out_unregister;
> +
> +		ret = pmu_sbi_snapshot_setup(pmu, smp_processor_id());
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			pr_info("SBI PMU snapshot detected\n");
> +			/*
> +			 * We enable it once here for the boot cpu. If snapshot shmem setup
> +			 * fails during cpu hotplug process, it will fail to start the cpu
> +			 * as we can not handle hetergenous PMUs with different snapshot
> +			 * capability.
> +			 */
> +			static_branch_enable(&sbi_pmu_snapshot_available);
> +		}
> +		/* Snapshot is an optional feature. Continue if not available */
> +	}
> +
>  	register_sysctl("kernel", sbi_pmu_sysctl_table);
>  
> +	ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance(CPUHP_AP_PERF_RISCV_STARTING, &pmu->node);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_unregister:
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> index 43282e22ebe1..c3fa90970042 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(used_hw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
>  	/* currently enabled firmware counters */
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(used_fw_ctrs, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
> +	/* The virtual address of the shared memory where counter snapshot will be taken */
> +	void *snapshot_addr;
> +	/* The physical address of the shared memory where counter snapshot will be taken */
> +	phys_addr_t snapshot_addr_phys;
> +	/* Boolean flag to indicate setup is already done */
> +	bool snapshot_set_done;

Instead of the 'snapshot_set_done' boolean, we can just use
snapshot_addr, which can't be NULL after setup.

>  };
>  
>  struct riscv_pmu {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Thanks,
drew

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-01 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 168+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29  1:01 [PATCH v4 00/15] RISC-V SBI v2.0 PMU improvements and Perf sampling in KVM guest Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01 ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01 ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] RISC-V: Fix the typo in Scountovf CSR name Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01  8:25   ` Clément Léger
2024-03-01  8:25     ` Clément Léger
2024-03-01  8:25     ` Clément Léger
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] RISC-V: Add FIRMWARE_READ_HI definition Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01  8:27   ` Clément Léger
2024-03-01  8:27     ` Clément Léger
2024-03-01  8:27     ` Clément Léger
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] drivers/perf: riscv: Read upper bits of a firmware counter Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01  9:52   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-01  9:52     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-01  9:52     ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] RISC-V: Add SBI PMU snapshot definitions Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01 11:14   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-01 11:14     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-01 11:14     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-01 19:30     ` Atish Kumar Patra
2024-03-01 19:30       ` Atish Kumar Patra
2024-03-01 19:30       ` Atish Kumar Patra
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] drivers/perf: riscv: Implement SBI PMU snapshot function Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01 14:40   ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2024-03-01 14:40     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-01 14:40     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-01 15:55     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-03-01 15:55       ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-03-01 15:55       ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] RISC-V: KVM: No need to update the counter value during reset Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-02  7:47   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02  7:47     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02  7:47     ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] RISC-V: KVM: No need to exit to the user space if perf event failed Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-02  8:15   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02  8:15     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02  8:15     ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-01 22:37     ` Atish Patra
2024-04-01 22:37       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-01 22:37       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-04 12:16       ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-04 12:16         ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-04 12:16         ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-10 22:44         ` Atish Patra
2024-04-10 22:44           ` Atish Patra
2024-04-10 22:44           ` Atish Patra
2024-04-11  7:38           ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-11  7:38             ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-11  7:38             ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] RISC-V: KVM: Implement SBI PMU Snapshot feature Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-02  9:49   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02  9:49     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02  9:49     ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-01 22:36     ` Atish Patra
2024-04-01 22:36       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-01 22:36       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-03  7:36       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-03  7:36         ` Atish Patra
2024-04-03  7:36         ` Atish Patra
2024-04-04 13:19         ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-04 13:19           ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-04 13:19           ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] RISC-V: KVM: Add perf sampling support for guests Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-02 10:33   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 10:33     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 10:33     ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-02  8:33     ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:33       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:33       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-05 12:05       ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-05 12:05         ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-05 12:05         ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-10  0:11         ` Atish Patra
2024-04-10  0:11           ` Atish Patra
2024-04-10  0:11           ` Atish Patra
2024-04-10  7:20           ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-10  7:20             ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-10  7:20             ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] RISC-V: KVM: Support 64 bit firmware counters on RV32 Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-02 10:52   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 10:52     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 10:52     ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-02  0:03     ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  0:03       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  0:03       ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add Sscofpmf to get-reg-list test Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01  4:42   ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:42     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:42     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-02 10:52   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 10:52     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 10:52     ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI PMU extension definitions Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01  4:43   ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:43     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:43     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-02 11:00   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 11:00     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 11:00     ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-02  8:43     ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:43       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:43       ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI PMU selftest Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01  4:47   ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:47     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:47     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-02  1:01     ` Atish Kumar Patra
2024-03-02  1:01       ` Atish Kumar Patra
2024-03-02  1:01       ` Atish Kumar Patra
2024-03-02 11:52   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 11:52     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 11:52     ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-02  8:34     ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:34       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:34       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-05 12:48       ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-05 12:48         ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-05 12:48         ` Andrew Jones
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for PMU snapshot functionality Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01  4:50   ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:50     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:50     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-02 12:13   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 12:13     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 12:13     ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-02  8:35     ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:35       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:35       ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for counter overflow Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-02-29  1:01   ` Atish Patra
2024-03-01  4:53   ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:53     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-01  4:53     ` Anup Patel
2024-03-02 12:35   ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 12:35     ` Andrew Jones
2024-03-02 12:35     ` Andrew Jones
2024-04-02  8:42     ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:42       ` Atish Patra
2024-04-02  8:42       ` Atish Patra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240301-9587f1bcaa6b25b1dcc7062e@orel \
    --to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.