From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com,
jiri@resnulli.us
Subject: [PATCH net-next] dpll: avoid multiple function calls to dump netdev info
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:16:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301001607.2925706-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
Due to compiler oddness and because struct dpll_pin is defined
in a private header we have to call into dpll code to get
the handle for the pin associated with a netdev.
Combine getting the pin pointer and getting the info into
a single function call by having the helpers take a netdev
pointer, rather than expecting a pin.
The exports are note needed, networking core can't be a module.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
BTW is the empty nest if the netdev has no pin intentional?
Should we add a comment explaining why it's there?
CC: vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev
CC: arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com
CC: jiri@resnulli.us
---
drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 5 -----
drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
include/linux/dpll.h | 19 ++++++-------------
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
index 12fcd420396e..a87bf95216c1 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
@@ -44,11 +44,6 @@ struct dpll_pin_registration {
void *priv;
};
-struct dpll_pin *netdev_dpll_pin(const struct net_device *dev)
-{
- return rcu_dereference_rtnl(dev->dpll_pin);
-}
-
struct dpll_device *dpll_device_get_by_id(int id)
{
if (xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index 1419fd0d241c..9be4ae35fea2 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <net/genetlink.h>
#include "dpll_core.h"
#include "dpll_netlink.h"
@@ -47,18 +48,6 @@ dpll_msg_add_dev_parent_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, u32 id)
return 0;
}
-/**
- * dpll_msg_pin_handle_size - get size of pin handle attribute for given pin
- * @pin: pin pointer
- *
- * Return: byte size of pin handle attribute for given pin.
- */
-size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin)
-{
- return pin ? nla_total_size(4) : 0; /* DPLL_A_PIN_ID */
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_msg_pin_handle_size);
-
/**
* dpll_msg_add_pin_handle - attach pin handle attribute to a given message
* @msg: pointer to sk_buff message to attach a pin handle
@@ -68,7 +57,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_msg_pin_handle_size);
* * 0 - success
* * -EMSGSIZE - no space in message to attach pin handle
*/
-int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
+static int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
{
if (!pin)
return 0;
@@ -76,7 +65,28 @@ int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
return -EMSGSIZE;
return 0;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_msg_add_pin_handle);
+
+static struct dpll_pin *netdev_dpll_pin(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ return rcu_dereference_rtnl(dev->dpll_pin);
+}
+
+/**
+ * dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size - get size of pin handle attribute of a netdev
+ * @dev: netdev from which to get the pin
+ *
+ * Return: byte size of pin handle attribute, or 0 if @dev has no pin.
+ */
+size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ return netdev_dpll_pin(dev) ? nla_total_size(4) : 0; /* DPLL_A_PIN_ID */
+}
+
+int dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg,
+ const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ return dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(msg, netdev_dpll_pin(dev));
+}
static int
dpll_msg_add_mode(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
index e3abde993244..ff14d1e88f87 100644
--- a/include/linux/dpll.h
+++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
@@ -123,15 +123,17 @@ struct dpll_pin_properties {
};
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
-size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin);
-int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin);
+size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(const struct net_device *dev);
+int dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg,
+ const struct net_device *dev);
#else
-static inline size_t dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(struct dpll_pin *pin)
+static inline size_t dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(const struct net_device *dev)
{
return 0;
}
-static inline int dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin)
+static inline int
+dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, const struct net_device *dev)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -170,13 +172,4 @@ int dpll_device_change_ntf(struct dpll_device *dpll);
int dpll_pin_change_ntf(struct dpll_pin *pin);
-#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
-static inline struct dpll_pin *netdev_dpll_pin(const struct net_device *dev)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-#else
-struct dpll_pin *netdev_dpll_pin(const struct net_device *dev);
-#endif
-
#endif
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 780b330f8ef9..e0353487c57e 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ static size_t rtnl_dpll_pin_size(const struct net_device *dev)
{
size_t size = nla_total_size(0); /* nest IFLA_DPLL_PIN */
- size += dpll_msg_pin_handle_size(netdev_dpll_pin(dev));
+ size += dpll_netdev_pin_handle_size(dev);
return size;
}
@@ -1793,7 +1793,7 @@ static int rtnl_fill_dpll_pin(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (!dpll_pin_nest)
return -EMSGSIZE;
- ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(skb, netdev_dpll_pin(dev));
+ ret = dpll_netdev_add_pin_handle(skb, dev);
if (ret < 0)
goto nest_cancel;
--
2.43.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-01 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-01 0:16 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-03-01 15:40 ` [PATCH net-next] dpll: avoid multiple function calls to dump netdev info Jiri Pirko
2024-03-01 16:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-03-01 17:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-02 9:36 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240301001607.2925706-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.