All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Init data before registering interrupt handler
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:15:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240304161557.GS30969@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vpe5jvnhz3r5cpfiofwrelp62awe74knbxrz47i2deflczx276@yahhrshr355r>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:04:08PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Jesper,

Hi Andi,

> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:01:14PM +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > devm_request_irq() is called before we initialize the "variant"
> > member variable from of_device_get_match_data(), so if an interrupt
> > is triggered inbetween, we can end up following a NULL pointer
> > in the interrupt handler.
> > 
> > This problem was exposed when the I2C controller in question was
> > (mis)configured to be used in both secure world and Linux.
> > 
> > That this can happen is also reflected by the existing code that
> > clears any pending interrupts from "u-boot or misc causes".
> > 
> > Move the clearing of pending interrupts and the call to
> > devm_request_irq() to the end of probe.
> 
> I'm OK with moving the irq request at the end and I'm going to
> give my r-b anyway. There is still one comment below.

Thanks.

> > Additionally, return failure if we can't find a match in devicetree.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
> 
> The way you are describing it you would need the Fixes tag here
> and this patch should be treated as a fix.

Ok, the variant member was introduced in:

218e1496135e ("i2c: exynos5: add support for HSI2C on Exynos5260 SoC")

Before that, the ordering didn't matter.

> Nevertheless, I think that it's odd that the device is sending
> interrupts at this phase and the real fix should be preventing
> the controller to send interrupts here.

I found this bug when we moved control of an I2C bus into secure
world (OP-TEE) and hadn't removed it from devicetree config.
Since we hadn't enabled the secure parts yet, the kernel could still get
the interrupt, even when OP-TEE was performing I2C transfers.

> How have you tested this patch?

This was tested in our ARTPEC-8 SoC, which includes the same IP the
exynos SoCs, both with and without the problematic configuration
described above.

> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> > index 385ef9d9e4d4..eba717e5cad7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> > @@ -906,24 +906,14 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	i2c->adap.algo_data = i2c;
> >  	i2c->adap.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> >  
> > -	/* Clear pending interrupts from u-boot or misc causes */
> > -	exynos5_i2c_clr_pend_irq(i2c);
> > -
> >  	spin_lock_init(&i2c->lock);
> >  	init_completion(&i2c->msg_complete);
> >  
> > -	i2c->irq = ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > -		goto err_clk;
> > -
> > -	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, i2c->irq, exynos5_i2c_irq,
> > -			       IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c);
> > -	if (ret != 0) {
> > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot request HS-I2C IRQ %d\n", i2c->irq);
> > -		goto err_clk;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	i2c->variant = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > +	if (!i2c->variant) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't match device variant\n");
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> 
> return dev_err_probe(), please.

Will do.

> Andi

/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
-- 
               Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Init data before registering interrupt handler
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:15:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240304161557.GS30969@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vpe5jvnhz3r5cpfiofwrelp62awe74knbxrz47i2deflczx276@yahhrshr355r>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:04:08PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Jesper,

Hi Andi,

> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:01:14PM +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > devm_request_irq() is called before we initialize the "variant"
> > member variable from of_device_get_match_data(), so if an interrupt
> > is triggered inbetween, we can end up following a NULL pointer
> > in the interrupt handler.
> > 
> > This problem was exposed when the I2C controller in question was
> > (mis)configured to be used in both secure world and Linux.
> > 
> > That this can happen is also reflected by the existing code that
> > clears any pending interrupts from "u-boot or misc causes".
> > 
> > Move the clearing of pending interrupts and the call to
> > devm_request_irq() to the end of probe.
> 
> I'm OK with moving the irq request at the end and I'm going to
> give my r-b anyway. There is still one comment below.

Thanks.

> > Additionally, return failure if we can't find a match in devicetree.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
> 
> The way you are describing it you would need the Fixes tag here
> and this patch should be treated as a fix.

Ok, the variant member was introduced in:

218e1496135e ("i2c: exynos5: add support for HSI2C on Exynos5260 SoC")

Before that, the ordering didn't matter.

> Nevertheless, I think that it's odd that the device is sending
> interrupts at this phase and the real fix should be preventing
> the controller to send interrupts here.

I found this bug when we moved control of an I2C bus into secure
world (OP-TEE) and hadn't removed it from devicetree config.
Since we hadn't enabled the secure parts yet, the kernel could still get
the interrupt, even when OP-TEE was performing I2C transfers.

> How have you tested this patch?

This was tested in our ARTPEC-8 SoC, which includes the same IP the
exynos SoCs, both with and without the problematic configuration
described above.

> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> > index 385ef9d9e4d4..eba717e5cad7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> > @@ -906,24 +906,14 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	i2c->adap.algo_data = i2c;
> >  	i2c->adap.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> >  
> > -	/* Clear pending interrupts from u-boot or misc causes */
> > -	exynos5_i2c_clr_pend_irq(i2c);
> > -
> >  	spin_lock_init(&i2c->lock);
> >  	init_completion(&i2c->msg_complete);
> >  
> > -	i2c->irq = ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > -		goto err_clk;
> > -
> > -	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, i2c->irq, exynos5_i2c_irq,
> > -			       IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c);
> > -	if (ret != 0) {
> > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot request HS-I2C IRQ %d\n", i2c->irq);
> > -		goto err_clk;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	i2c->variant = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > +	if (!i2c->variant) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't match device variant\n");
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> 
> return dev_err_probe(), please.

Will do.

> Andi

/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
-- 
               Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04 11:01 [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Init data before registering interrupt handler Jesper Nilsson
2024-03-04 11:01 ` Jesper Nilsson
2024-03-04 15:04 ` Andi Shyti
2024-03-04 15:04   ` Andi Shyti
2024-03-04 15:08   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-03-04 15:08     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-03-04 16:17     ` Jesper Nilsson
2024-03-04 16:17       ` Jesper Nilsson
2024-03-04 16:15   ` Jesper Nilsson [this message]
2024-03-04 16:15     ` Jesper Nilsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240304161557.GS30969@axis.com \
    --to=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@axis.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.