All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: [linux-next:master 12265/12944] arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:904:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_leaf'; did you mean 'pmd_leaf'?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 16:10:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head:   8ffc8b1bbd505e27e2c8439d326b6059c906c9dd
commit: 924bd6a8c96767a05323d575bdefd664631dce73 [12265/12944] mm/x86: drop two unnecessary pud_leaf() definitions
config: arm64-randconfig-r031-20230409 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240310/202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240310/202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6,
                    from arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:12,
                    from include/linux/io.h:13,
                    from include/acpi/acpi_io.h:5,
                    from include/linux/acpi.h:39,
                    from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
                    from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
                    from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
                    from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'pud_user_accessible_page':
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:904:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_leaf'; did you mean 'pmd_leaf'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     904 |         return pud_leaf(pud) && (pud_user(pud) || pud_user_exec(pud));
         |                ^~~~~~~~
         |                pmd_leaf
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
   make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:116: arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
   make[3]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[2]: *** [Makefile:1199: prepare0] Error 2
   make[2]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.


vim +904 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h

ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  901  
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  902  static inline bool pud_user_accessible_page(pud_t pud)
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  903  {
730a11f982e61a Liu Shixin   2022-11-22 @904  	return pud_leaf(pud) && (pud_user(pud) || pud_user_exec(pud));
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  905  }
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  906  #endif
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  907  

:::::: The code at line 904 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 730a11f982e61aaef758ab552dfb7c30de79e99b arm64/mm: add pud_user_exec() check in pud_user_accessible_page()

:::::: TO: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
:::::: CC: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-10  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-10  8:10 kernel test robot [this message]
2024-03-11 16:19 ` [linux-next:master 12265/12944] arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:904:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_leaf'; did you mean 'pmd_leaf'? Peter Xu
2024-03-13 19:06   ` Andrew Morton
2024-03-13 19:59     ` Peter Xu
2024-03-14  9:09   ` Yujie Liu
2024-03-14 14:10     ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.