All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Eva Kurchatova <nyandarknessgirl@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	bugs@lists.linux.dev, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	jikos@kernel.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com,
	dianders@chromium.org, mripard@kernel.org,
	johan+linaro@kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Boot hang with SiFive PLIC when routing I2C-HID level-triggered interrupts
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:27:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240317222718.3e03edb1@namcao> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+eeCSPUDpUg76ZO8dszSbAGn+UHjcyv8F1J-CUPVARAzEtW9w@mail.gmail.com>

Cc: HID folks

On 14/Mar/2024 Eva Kurchatova wrote:
> If an I2C-HID controller level-triggered IRQ line is routed directly as
> a PLIC IRQ, and we spam input early enough in kernel boot process
> (Somewhere between initializing NET, ALSA subsystems and before
> i2c-hid driver init), then there is a chance of kernel locking up
> completely and not going any further.
> 
> There are no kernel messages printed with all the IRQ, task hang
> debugging enabled - other than (sometimes) it reports sched RT
> throttling after a few seconds. Basic timer interrupt handling is
> intact - fbdev tty cursor is still blinking.
> 
> It appears that in such a case the I2C-HID IRQ line is raised; PLIC
> notifies the (single) boot system hart, kernel claims the IRQ and
> immediately completes it by writing to CLAIM/COMPLETE register.
> No access to the I2C controller (OpenCores) or I2C-HID registers
> is made, so the HID report is never consumed and IRQ line stays
> raised forever. The kernel endlessly claims & completes IRQs
> without doing any work with the device. It doesn't always end up this
> way; sometimes boot process completes and there are no signs of
> interrupt storm or stuck IRQ processing afterwards.

It seems I2C HID's interrupt handler (i2c_hid_irq) returns immediately if
I2C_HID_READ_PENDING is set. This flag is supposed to be cleared in
i2c_hid_xfer(), but since the (threaded) interrupt handler runs at higher
priority, the flag is never cleared. So we have a lock-up: interrupt
handler won't do anything unless the flag is cleared, but the clearing of
this flag is done in a lower priority task which never gets scheduled while
the interrupt handler is active.

There is RT throttling to prevent RT tasks from locking up the system like
this. I don't know much about scheduling stuffs, so I am not really sure
why RT throttling does not work. I think because RT throttling triggers
when RT tasks take too much CPU time, but in this case hard interrupt
handlers take lots of CPU time too (~50% according to my measurement), so
RT throttling doesn't trigger often enough (in this case, it triggers once
and never again). Again, I don't know much about scheduler so I may be
talking nonsense here.

The flag I2C_HID_READ_PENDING seems to be used to make sure that only 1
I2C operation can happen at a time. But this seems pointless, because I2C
subsystem already takes care of this. So I think we can just remove it.

Can you give the below patch a try?

diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c
index 2735cd585af0..799ad0ef9c4a 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@
 /* flags */
 #define I2C_HID_STARTED		0
 #define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	1
-#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	2
 
 #define I2C_HID_PWR_ON		0x00
 #define I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP	0x01
@@ -190,15 +189,10 @@ static int i2c_hid_xfer(struct i2c_hid *ihid,
 		msgs[n].len = recv_len;
 		msgs[n].buf = recv_buf;
 		n++;
-
-		set_bit(I2C_HID_READ_PENDING, &ihid->flags);
 	}
 
 	ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, n);
 
-	if (recv_len)
-		clear_bit(I2C_HID_READ_PENDING, &ihid->flags);
-
 	if (ret != n)
 		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO;
 
@@ -566,9 +560,6 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_hid_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct i2c_hid *ihid = dev_id;
 
-	if (test_bit(I2C_HID_READ_PENDING, &ihid->flags))
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-
 	i2c_hid_get_input(ihid);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Eva Kurchatova <nyandarknessgirl@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	bugs@lists.linux.dev, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	jikos@kernel.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com,
	dianders@chromium.org, mripard@kernel.org,
	johan+linaro@kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Boot hang with SiFive PLIC when routing I2C-HID level-triggered interrupts
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 22:27:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240317222718.3e03edb1@namcao> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+eeCSPUDpUg76ZO8dszSbAGn+UHjcyv8F1J-CUPVARAzEtW9w@mail.gmail.com>

Cc: HID folks

On 14/Mar/2024 Eva Kurchatova wrote:
> If an I2C-HID controller level-triggered IRQ line is routed directly as
> a PLIC IRQ, and we spam input early enough in kernel boot process
> (Somewhere between initializing NET, ALSA subsystems and before
> i2c-hid driver init), then there is a chance of kernel locking up
> completely and not going any further.
> 
> There are no kernel messages printed with all the IRQ, task hang
> debugging enabled - other than (sometimes) it reports sched RT
> throttling after a few seconds. Basic timer interrupt handling is
> intact - fbdev tty cursor is still blinking.
> 
> It appears that in such a case the I2C-HID IRQ line is raised; PLIC
> notifies the (single) boot system hart, kernel claims the IRQ and
> immediately completes it by writing to CLAIM/COMPLETE register.
> No access to the I2C controller (OpenCores) or I2C-HID registers
> is made, so the HID report is never consumed and IRQ line stays
> raised forever. The kernel endlessly claims & completes IRQs
> without doing any work with the device. It doesn't always end up this
> way; sometimes boot process completes and there are no signs of
> interrupt storm or stuck IRQ processing afterwards.

It seems I2C HID's interrupt handler (i2c_hid_irq) returns immediately if
I2C_HID_READ_PENDING is set. This flag is supposed to be cleared in
i2c_hid_xfer(), but since the (threaded) interrupt handler runs at higher
priority, the flag is never cleared. So we have a lock-up: interrupt
handler won't do anything unless the flag is cleared, but the clearing of
this flag is done in a lower priority task which never gets scheduled while
the interrupt handler is active.

There is RT throttling to prevent RT tasks from locking up the system like
this. I don't know much about scheduling stuffs, so I am not really sure
why RT throttling does not work. I think because RT throttling triggers
when RT tasks take too much CPU time, but in this case hard interrupt
handlers take lots of CPU time too (~50% according to my measurement), so
RT throttling doesn't trigger often enough (in this case, it triggers once
and never again). Again, I don't know much about scheduler so I may be
talking nonsense here.

The flag I2C_HID_READ_PENDING seems to be used to make sure that only 1
I2C operation can happen at a time. But this seems pointless, because I2C
subsystem already takes care of this. So I think we can just remove it.

Can you give the below patch a try?

diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c
index 2735cd585af0..799ad0ef9c4a 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@
 /* flags */
 #define I2C_HID_STARTED		0
 #define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	1
-#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	2
 
 #define I2C_HID_PWR_ON		0x00
 #define I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP	0x01
@@ -190,15 +189,10 @@ static int i2c_hid_xfer(struct i2c_hid *ihid,
 		msgs[n].len = recv_len;
 		msgs[n].buf = recv_buf;
 		n++;
-
-		set_bit(I2C_HID_READ_PENDING, &ihid->flags);
 	}
 
 	ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, n);
 
-	if (recv_len)
-		clear_bit(I2C_HID_READ_PENDING, &ihid->flags);
-
 	if (ret != n)
 		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO;
 
@@ -566,9 +560,6 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_hid_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct i2c_hid *ihid = dev_id;
 
-	if (test_bit(I2C_HID_READ_PENDING, &ihid->flags))
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-
 	i2c_hid_get_input(ihid);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-17 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-14  7:12 Boot hang with SiFive PLIC when routing I2C-HID level-triggered interrupts Eva Kurchatova
2024-03-14  7:12 ` Eva Kurchatova
2024-03-14 21:46 ` Conor Dooley
2024-03-14 21:46   ` Conor Dooley
2024-03-15  3:33   ` Eva Kurchatova
2024-03-15  3:33     ` Eva Kurchatova
2024-03-15 12:45     ` Conor Dooley
2024-03-15 12:45       ` Conor Dooley
2024-03-17 21:27 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2024-03-17 21:27   ` Nam Cao
2024-03-18  8:48   ` Eva Kurchatova
2024-03-18  8:48     ` Eva Kurchatova
2024-03-18  9:01     ` Nam Cao
2024-03-18  9:01       ` Nam Cao
2024-03-18 10:24       ` Eva Kurchatova
2024-03-18 10:24         ` Eva Kurchatova

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240317222718.3e03edb1@namcao \
    --to=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=bugs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nyandarknessgirl@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.