* + ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch
@ 2024-03-18 20:51 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2024-03-18 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, piaojun, mark, junxiao.bi, jlbec, heming.zhao, ghe,
gechangwei, joseph.qi, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: correctly use ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit()
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch. Its filename is
ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: ocfs2: correctly use ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit()
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:17:13 +0800
If no bits are zero, ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit() will return max size, so
check the return value with -1 is meaningless. Correct this usage and
cleanup the code.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240314021713.240796-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c | 19 ++++++-------------
fs/ocfs2/reservations.c | 2 +-
fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 6 ++----
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c~ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c
@@ -863,14 +863,8 @@ static int ocfs2_local_alloc_find_clear_
numfound = bitoff = startoff = 0;
left = le32_to_cpu(alloc->id1.bitmap1.i_total);
- while ((bitoff = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, left, startoff)) != -1) {
- if (bitoff == left) {
- /* mlog(0, "bitoff (%d) == left", bitoff); */
- break;
- }
- /* mlog(0, "Found a zero: bitoff = %d, startoff = %d, "
- "numfound = %d\n", bitoff, startoff, numfound);*/
-
+ while ((bitoff = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, left, startoff)) <
+ left) {
/* Ok, we found a zero bit... is it contig. or do we
* start over?*/
if (bitoff == startoff) {
@@ -976,9 +970,9 @@ static int ocfs2_sync_local_to_main(stru
start = count = 0;
left = le32_to_cpu(alloc->id1.bitmap1.i_total);
- while ((bit_off = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, left, start))
- != -1) {
- if ((bit_off < left) && (bit_off == start)) {
+ while ((bit_off = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, left, start)) <
+ left) {
+ if (bit_off == start) {
count++;
start++;
continue;
@@ -1002,8 +996,7 @@ static int ocfs2_sync_local_to_main(stru
goto bail;
}
}
- if (bit_off >= left)
- break;
+
count = 1;
start = bit_off + 1;
}
--- a/fs/ocfs2/reservations.c~ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/reservations.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int ocfs2_resmap_find_free_bits(s
start = search_start;
while ((offset = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, resmap->m_bitmap_len,
- start)) != -1) {
+ start)) < resmap->m_bitmap_len) {
/* Search reached end of the region */
if (offset >= (search_start + search_len))
break;
--- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c~ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
@@ -1290,10 +1290,8 @@ static int ocfs2_block_group_find_clear_
found = start = best_offset = best_size = 0;
bitmap = bg->bg_bitmap;
- while((offset = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, total_bits, start)) != -1) {
- if (offset == total_bits)
- break;
-
+ while ((offset = ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, total_bits, start)) <
+ total_bits) {
if (!ocfs2_test_bg_bit_allocatable(bg_bh, offset)) {
/* We found a zero, but we can't use it as it
* hasn't been put to disk yet! */
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com are
ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-03-18 20:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-18 20:51 + ocfs2-correctly-use-ocfs2_find_next_zero_bit.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.