From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kernel@openeuler.org, sanglipeng <sanglipeng1@jd.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [openeuler:OLK-5.10 29921/30000] drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:2320:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait'; did you mean 'mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write'?
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 06:56:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202403250650.sQ1xsBky-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10
head: b670dd901cbbf97745380d373b1d2607b3235590
commit: 02956abc74ede6549249eb21e5b319b92dd147f3 [29921/30000] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent
config: x86_64-randconfig-012-20240323 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240325/202403250650.sQ1xsBky-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240325/202403250650.sQ1xsBky-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403250650.sQ1xsBky-lkp@intel.com/
Note: the openeuler/OLK-5.10 HEAD b670dd901cbbf97745380d373b1d2607b3235590 builds fine.
It only hurts bisectability.
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c: In function 'mv88e6xxx_hardware_reset':
>> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:2320:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait'; did you mean 'mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2320 | mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +2320 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
2306
2307 static void mv88e6xxx_hardware_reset(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
2308 {
2309 struct gpio_desc *gpiod = chip->reset;
2310
2311 /* If there is a GPIO connected to the reset pin, toggle it */
2312 if (gpiod) {
2313 /* If the switch has just been reset and not yet completed
2314 * loading EEPROM, the reset may interrupt the I2C transaction
2315 * mid-byte, causing the first EEPROM read after the reset
2316 * from the wrong location resulting in the switch booting
2317 * to wrong mode and inoperable.
2318 */
2319 if (chip->info->ops->get_eeprom)
> 2320 mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
2321
2322 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 1);
2323 usleep_range(10000, 20000);
2324 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 0);
2325 usleep_range(10000, 20000);
2326
2327 if (chip->info->ops->get_eeprom)
2328 mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
2329 }
2330 }
2331
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2024-03-24 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202403250650.sQ1xsBky-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@openeuler.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sanglipeng1@jd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.