* [openeuler:OLK-5.10 29921/30000] drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:2320:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait'; did you mean 'mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write'?
@ 2024-03-24 22:56 kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-03-24 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel, sanglipeng; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all
tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10
head: b670dd901cbbf97745380d373b1d2607b3235590
commit: 02956abc74ede6549249eb21e5b319b92dd147f3 [29921/30000] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent
config: x86_64-randconfig-012-20240323 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240325/202403250650.sQ1xsBky-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240325/202403250650.sQ1xsBky-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403250650.sQ1xsBky-lkp@intel.com/
Note: the openeuler/OLK-5.10 HEAD b670dd901cbbf97745380d373b1d2607b3235590 builds fine.
It only hurts bisectability.
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c: In function 'mv88e6xxx_hardware_reset':
>> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:2320:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait'; did you mean 'mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2320 | mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +2320 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
2306
2307 static void mv88e6xxx_hardware_reset(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
2308 {
2309 struct gpio_desc *gpiod = chip->reset;
2310
2311 /* If there is a GPIO connected to the reset pin, toggle it */
2312 if (gpiod) {
2313 /* If the switch has just been reset and not yet completed
2314 * loading EEPROM, the reset may interrupt the I2C transaction
2315 * mid-byte, causing the first EEPROM read after the reset
2316 * from the wrong location resulting in the switch booting
2317 * to wrong mode and inoperable.
2318 */
2319 if (chip->info->ops->get_eeprom)
> 2320 mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
2321
2322 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 1);
2323 usleep_range(10000, 20000);
2324 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 0);
2325 usleep_range(10000, 20000);
2326
2327 if (chip->info->ops->get_eeprom)
2328 mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait(chip);
2329 }
2330 }
2331
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-03-24 22:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-24 22:56 [openeuler:OLK-5.10 29921/30000] drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:2320:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait'; did you mean 'mv88e6xxx_g2_pvt_write'? kernel test robot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.