Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] mm: Provide pagesize to pmd_populate()

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:55:54PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Unlike many architectures, powerpc 8xx hardware tablewalk requires
> a two level process for all page sizes, allthough second level only
> has one entry when pagesize is 8M.
> 
> To fit with Linux page table topology and without requiring special
> page directory layout like hugepd, the page entry will be replicated
> 1024 times in the standard page table. However for large pages it is
> necessary to set bits in the level-1 (PMD) entry. At the time being,
> for 512k pages the flag is kept in the PTE and inserted in the PMD
> entry at TLB miss exception, that is necessary because we can have
> pages of different sizes in a page table. However the 12 PTE bits are
> fully used and there is no room for an additional bit for page size.
> 
> For 8M pages, there will be only one page per PMD entry, it is
> therefore possible to flag the pagesize in the PMD entry, with the
> advantage that the information will already be at the right place for
> the hardware.
> 
> To do so, add a new helper called pmd_populate_size() which takes the
> page size as an additional argument, and modify __pte_alloc() to also
> take that argument. pte_alloc() is left unmodified in order to
> reduce churn on callers, and a pte_alloc_size() is added for use by
> pte_alloc_huge().
> 
> When an architecture doesn't provide pmd_populate_size(),
> pmd_populate() is used as a fallback.

I think it would be a good idea to document what the semantic is
supposed to be for sz?

Just a general remark, probably nothing for this, but with these new
arguments the historical naming seems pretty tortured for
pte_alloc_size().. Something like pmd_populate_leaf(size) as a naming
scheme would make this more intuitive. Ie pmd_populate_leaf() gives
you a PMD entry where the entry points to a leaf page table able to
store folios of at least size.

Anyhow, I thought the edits to the mm helpers were fine, certainly
much nicer than hugepd. Do you see a path to remove hugepd entirely
from here?

Thanks,
Jason