From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@ti.com>,
"Vidya Sagar" <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Minghuan Lian" <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
"Mingkai Hu" <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>, "Roy Zang" <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
"Kunihiko Hayashi" <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Jesper Nilsson" <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
"Srikanth Thokala" <srikanth.thokala@intel.com>,
"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@axis.com,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/8] PCI: endpoint: Remove "core_init_notifier" flag
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:10:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327084056.GC2742@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgPXpZgoMqVn8QHt@ryzen>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 09:24:05AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Hello Mani,
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:05:54PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > "core_init_notifier" flag is set by the glue drivers requiring refclk from
> > the host to complete the DWC core initialization. Also, those drivers will
> > send a notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
> > completed using the pci_epc_init_notify() API. Only then, the EPF drivers
> > will start functioning.
> >
> > For the rest of the drivers generating refclk locally, EPF drivers will
> > start functioning post binding with them. EPF drivers rely on the
> > 'core_init_notifier' flag to differentiate between the drivers.
> > Unfortunately, this creates two different flows for the EPF drivers.
> >
> > So to avoid that, let's get rid of the "core_init_notifier" flag and follow
> > a single initialization flow for the EPF drivers. This is done by calling
> > the dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() from all glue drivers after the completion of
> > dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() API. This will allow all the glue drivers to
> > send the notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
> > completed.
> >
> > Only difference here is that, the drivers requiring refclk from host will
> > send the notification once refclk is received, while others will send it
> > during probe time itself.
> >
> > But this also requires the EPC core driver to deliver the notification
> > after EPF driver bind. Because, the glue driver can send the notification
> > before the EPF drivers bind() and in those cases the EPF drivers will miss
> > the event. To accommodate this, EPC core is now caching the state of the
> > EPC initialization in 'init_complete' flag and pci-ep-cfs driver sends the
> > notification to EPF drivers based on that after each EPF driver bind.
> >
> > Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 1 +
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-keembay.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 1 -
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 1 -
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 18 +++++-------------
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 9 +++++++++
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pci-epc.h | 7 ++++---
> > 19 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > index 2d0a8d78bffb..da67a06ee790 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > @@ -734,6 +734,8 @@ int cdns_pcie_ep_setup(struct cdns_pcie_ep *ep)
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&ep->lock);
> >
> > + dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(&pci->ep);
>
> This looks wrong (and I think that you have not build tested this).
>
Ah, this is silly. Sorry, added the change in a rush :(
> dw_* prefix indicates DWC, so it is a DWC specific function.
>
> I don't think that you can use this function for the 3 non-DWC EPC drivers.
> I think that you need to use call pci_epc_init_notify() directly.
>
>
> (Also perhaps rebase your series on v6.9-rc1, I got conflicts when trying
> to apply it to v6.9-rc1, because it looks like the series is still based
> on v6.8-rc1.)
>
I rebased the epf rework series and didn't get any conflict. But will rebase
this one also and send next version.
Thanks for noticing my idiocy.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@ti.com>,
"Vidya Sagar" <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Minghuan Lian" <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
"Mingkai Hu" <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>, "Roy Zang" <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
"Kunihiko Hayashi" <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Jesper Nilsson" <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
"Srikanth Thokala" <srikanth.thokala@intel.com>,
"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@axis.com,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/8] PCI: endpoint: Remove "core_init_notifier" flag
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:10:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327084056.GC2742@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgPXpZgoMqVn8QHt@ryzen>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 09:24:05AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Hello Mani,
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:05:54PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > "core_init_notifier" flag is set by the glue drivers requiring refclk from
> > the host to complete the DWC core initialization. Also, those drivers will
> > send a notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
> > completed using the pci_epc_init_notify() API. Only then, the EPF drivers
> > will start functioning.
> >
> > For the rest of the drivers generating refclk locally, EPF drivers will
> > start functioning post binding with them. EPF drivers rely on the
> > 'core_init_notifier' flag to differentiate between the drivers.
> > Unfortunately, this creates two different flows for the EPF drivers.
> >
> > So to avoid that, let's get rid of the "core_init_notifier" flag and follow
> > a single initialization flow for the EPF drivers. This is done by calling
> > the dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() from all glue drivers after the completion of
> > dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() API. This will allow all the glue drivers to
> > send the notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
> > completed.
> >
> > Only difference here is that, the drivers requiring refclk from host will
> > send the notification once refclk is received, while others will send it
> > during probe time itself.
> >
> > But this also requires the EPC core driver to deliver the notification
> > after EPF driver bind. Because, the glue driver can send the notification
> > before the EPF drivers bind() and in those cases the EPF drivers will miss
> > the event. To accommodate this, EPC core is now caching the state of the
> > EPC initialization in 'init_complete' flag and pci-ep-cfs driver sends the
> > notification to EPF drivers based on that after each EPF driver bind.
> >
> > Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 1 +
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-keembay.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 1 -
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 1 -
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 18 +++++-------------
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 9 +++++++++
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pci-epc.h | 7 ++++---
> > 19 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > index 2d0a8d78bffb..da67a06ee790 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > @@ -734,6 +734,8 @@ int cdns_pcie_ep_setup(struct cdns_pcie_ep *ep)
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&ep->lock);
> >
> > + dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(&pci->ep);
>
> This looks wrong (and I think that you have not build tested this).
>
Ah, this is silly. Sorry, added the change in a rush :(
> dw_* prefix indicates DWC, so it is a DWC specific function.
>
> I don't think that you can use this function for the 3 non-DWC EPC drivers.
> I think that you need to use call pci_epc_init_notify() directly.
>
>
> (Also perhaps rebase your series on v6.9-rc1, I got conflicts when trying
> to apply it to v6.9-rc1, because it looks like the series is still based
> on v6.8-rc1.)
>
I rebased the epf rework series and didn't get any conflict. But will rebase
this one also and send next version.
Thanks for noticing my idiocy.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Kunihiko Hayashi" <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Minghuan Lian" <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@ti.com>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Jesper Nilsson" <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@axis.com,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"Srikanth Thokala" <srikanth.thokala@intel.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, "Mingk ai Hu" <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Roy Zang" <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Vidya Sagar" <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/8] PCI: endpoint: Remove "core_init_notifier" flag
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:10:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327084056.GC2742@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgPXpZgoMqVn8QHt@ryzen>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 09:24:05AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Hello Mani,
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:05:54PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > "core_init_notifier" flag is set by the glue drivers requiring refclk from
> > the host to complete the DWC core initialization. Also, those drivers will
> > send a notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
> > completed using the pci_epc_init_notify() API. Only then, the EPF drivers
> > will start functioning.
> >
> > For the rest of the drivers generating refclk locally, EPF drivers will
> > start functioning post binding with them. EPF drivers rely on the
> > 'core_init_notifier' flag to differentiate between the drivers.
> > Unfortunately, this creates two different flows for the EPF drivers.
> >
> > So to avoid that, let's get rid of the "core_init_notifier" flag and follow
> > a single initialization flow for the EPF drivers. This is done by calling
> > the dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() from all glue drivers after the completion of
> > dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() API. This will allow all the glue drivers to
> > send the notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
> > completed.
> >
> > Only difference here is that, the drivers requiring refclk from host will
> > send the notification once refclk is received, while others will send it
> > during probe time itself.
> >
> > But this also requires the EPC core driver to deliver the notification
> > after EPF driver bind. Because, the glue driver can send the notification
> > before the EPF drivers bind() and in those cases the EPF drivers will miss
> > the event. To accommodate this, EPC core is now caching the state of the
> > EPC initialization in 'init_complete' flag and pci-ep-cfs driver sends the
> > notification to EPF drivers based on that after each EPF driver bind.
> >
> > Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 1 +
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-keembay.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 1 -
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 1 -
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 18 +++++-------------
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 9 +++++++++
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pci-epc.h | 7 ++++---
> > 19 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > index 2d0a8d78bffb..da67a06ee790 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > @@ -734,6 +734,8 @@ int cdns_pcie_ep_setup(struct cdns_pcie_ep *ep)
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&ep->lock);
> >
> > + dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(&pci->ep);
>
> This looks wrong (and I think that you have not build tested this).
>
Ah, this is silly. Sorry, added the change in a rush :(
> dw_* prefix indicates DWC, so it is a DWC specific function.
>
> I don't think that you can use this function for the 3 non-DWC EPC drivers.
> I think that you need to use call pci_epc_init_notify() directly.
>
>
> (Also perhaps rebase your series on v6.9-rc1, I got conflicts when trying
> to apply it to v6.9-rc1, because it looks like the series is still based
> on v6.8-rc1.)
>
I rebased the epf rework series and didn't get any conflict. But will rebase
this one also and send next version.
Thanks for noticing my idiocy.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@ti.com>,
"Vidya Sagar" <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Minghuan Lian" <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
"Mingkai Hu" <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>, "Roy Zang" <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
"Kunihiko Hayashi" <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Jesper Nilsson" <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
"Srikanth Thokala" <srikanth.thokala@intel.com>,
"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@axis.com,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/8] PCI: endpoint: Remove "core_init_notifier" flag
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:10:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327084056.GC2742@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgPXpZgoMqVn8QHt@ryzen>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 09:24:05AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Hello Mani,
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:05:54PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > "core_init_notifier" flag is set by the glue drivers requiring refclk from
> > the host to complete the DWC core initialization. Also, those drivers will
> > send a notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
> > completed using the pci_epc_init_notify() API. Only then, the EPF drivers
> > will start functioning.
> >
> > For the rest of the drivers generating refclk locally, EPF drivers will
> > start functioning post binding with them. EPF drivers rely on the
> > 'core_init_notifier' flag to differentiate between the drivers.
> > Unfortunately, this creates two different flows for the EPF drivers.
> >
> > So to avoid that, let's get rid of the "core_init_notifier" flag and follow
> > a single initialization flow for the EPF drivers. This is done by calling
> > the dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() from all glue drivers after the completion of
> > dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() API. This will allow all the glue drivers to
> > send the notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
> > completed.
> >
> > Only difference here is that, the drivers requiring refclk from host will
> > send the notification once refclk is received, while others will send it
> > during probe time itself.
> >
> > But this also requires the EPC core driver to deliver the notification
> > after EPF driver bind. Because, the glue driver can send the notification
> > before the EPF drivers bind() and in those cases the EPF drivers will miss
> > the event. To accommodate this, EPC core is now caching the state of the
> > EPC initialization in 'init_complete' flag and pci-ep-cfs driver sends the
> > notification to EPF drivers based on that after each EPF driver bind.
> >
> > Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 1 +
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-keembay.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 1 -
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 1 -
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 18 +++++-------------
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c | 9 +++++++++
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pci-epc.h | 7 ++++---
> > 19 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > index 2d0a8d78bffb..da67a06ee790 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> > @@ -734,6 +734,8 @@ int cdns_pcie_ep_setup(struct cdns_pcie_ep *ep)
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&ep->lock);
> >
> > + dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(&pci->ep);
>
> This looks wrong (and I think that you have not build tested this).
>
Ah, this is silly. Sorry, added the change in a rush :(
> dw_* prefix indicates DWC, so it is a DWC specific function.
>
> I don't think that you can use this function for the 3 non-DWC EPC drivers.
> I think that you need to use call pci_epc_init_notify() directly.
>
>
> (Also perhaps rebase your series on v6.9-rc1, I got conflicts when trying
> to apply it to v6.9-rc1, because it looks like the series is still based
> on v6.8-rc1.)
>
I rebased the epf rework series and didn't get any conflict. But will rebase
this one also and send next version.
Thanks for noticing my idiocy.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 6:35 [PATCH v11 0/8] PCI: dwc: ep: Fix DBI access failure for drivers requiring refclk from host Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` [PATCH v11 1/8] " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` [PATCH v11 2/8] PCI: dwc: ep: Add Kernel-doc comments for APIs Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` [PATCH v11 3/8] PCI: dwc: ep: Remove deinit() callback from struct dw_pcie_ep_ops Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` [PATCH v11 4/8] PCI: dwc: ep: Rename dw_pcie_ep_exit() to dw_pcie_ep_deinit() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` [PATCH v11 5/8] PCI: dwc: ep: Introduce dw_pcie_ep_cleanup() API for drivers supporting PERST# Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` [PATCH v11 6/8] PCI: dwc: ep: Rename dw_pcie_ep_init_complete() to dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` [PATCH v11 7/8] PCI: dwc: ep: Call dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() API directly from all glue drivers Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` [PATCH v11 8/8] PCI: endpoint: Remove "core_init_notifier" flag Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 6:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 8:24 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-27 8:24 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-27 8:24 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-27 8:24 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-27 8:40 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-03-27 8:40 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 8:40 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-27 8:40 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240327084056.GC2742@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=minghuan.Lian@nxp.com \
--cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=srikanth.thokala@intel.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.