From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/3] mm/gup: consistently call it GUP-fast
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:05:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327130538.680256-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
Some cleanups around function names, comments and the config option of
"GUP-fast" -- GUP without "lock" safety belts on.
With this cleanup it's easy to judge which functions are GUP-fast specific.
We now consistently call it "GUP-fast", avoiding mixing it with "fast GUP",
"lockless", or simply "gup" (which I always considered confusing in the
ode).
So the magic now happens in functions that contain "gup_fast", whereby
gup_fast() is the entry point into that magic. Comments consistently
reference either "GUP-fast" or "gup_fast()".
Based on mm-unstable from today. I won't CC arch maintainers, but only
arch mailing lists, to reduce noise.
Tested on x86_64, cross compiled on a bunch of archs, whereby some of them
don't properly even compile on mm-unstable anymore in my usual setup
(alpha, arc, parisc64, sh) ... maybe the cross compilers are outdated,
but there are no new ones around. Hm.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org
David Hildenbrand (3):
mm/gup: consistently name GUP-fast functions
mm/treewide: rename CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP to CONFIG_HAVE_GUP_FAST
mm: use "GUP-fast" instead "fast GUP" in remaining comments
arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/mips/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/s390/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/sh/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
include/linux/rmap.h | 8 +-
kernel/events/core.c | 4 +-
mm/Kconfig | 2 +-
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
mm/gup.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
mm/internal.h | 2 +-
mm/khugepaged.c | 2 +-
15 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
--
2.43.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/3] mm/gup: consistently call it GUP-fast
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:05:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327130538.680256-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
Some cleanups around function names, comments and the config option of
"GUP-fast" -- GUP without "lock" safety belts on.
With this cleanup it's easy to judge which functions are GUP-fast specific.
We now consistently call it "GUP-fast", avoiding mixing it with "fast GUP",
"lockless", or simply "gup" (which I always considered confusing in the
ode).
So the magic now happens in functions that contain "gup_fast", whereby
gup_fast() is the entry point into that magic. Comments consistently
reference either "GUP-fast" or "gup_fast()".
Based on mm-unstable from today. I won't CC arch maintainers, but only
arch mailing lists, to reduce noise.
Tested on x86_64, cross compiled on a bunch of archs, whereby some of them
don't properly even compile on mm-unstable anymore in my usual setup
(alpha, arc, parisc64, sh) ... maybe the cross compilers are outdated,
but there are no new ones around. Hm.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org
David Hildenbrand (3):
mm/gup: consistently name GUP-fast functions
mm/treewide: rename CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP to CONFIG_HAVE_GUP_FAST
mm: use "GUP-fast" instead "fast GUP" in remaining comments
arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/mips/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/s390/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/sh/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
include/linux/rmap.h | 8 +-
kernel/events/core.c | 4 +-
mm/Kconfig | 2 +-
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
mm/gup.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
mm/internal.h | 2 +-
mm/khugepaged.c | 2 +-
15 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
--
2.43.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/3] mm/gup: consistently call it GUP-fast
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:05:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327130538.680256-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
Some cleanups around function names, comments and the config option of
"GUP-fast" -- GUP without "lock" safety belts on.
With this cleanup it's easy to judge which functions are GUP-fast specific.
We now consistently call it "GUP-fast", avoiding mixing it with "fast GUP",
"lockless", or simply "gup" (which I always considered confusing in the
ode).
So the magic now happens in functions that contain "gup_fast", whereby
gup_fast() is the entry point into that magic. Comments consistently
reference either "GUP-fast" or "gup_fast()".
Based on mm-unstable from today. I won't CC arch maintainers, but only
arch mailing lists, to reduce noise.
Tested on x86_64, cross compiled on a bunch of archs, whereby some of them
don't properly even compile on mm-unstable anymore in my usual setup
(alpha, arc, parisc64, sh) ... maybe the cross compilers are outdated,
but there are no new ones around. Hm.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org
David Hildenbrand (3):
mm/gup: consistently name GUP-fast functions
mm/treewide: rename CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP to CONFIG_HAVE_GUP_FAST
mm: use "GUP-fast" instead "fast GUP" in remaining comments
arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/mips/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/s390/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/sh/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
include/linux/rmap.h | 8 +-
kernel/events/core.c | 4 +-
mm/Kconfig | 2 +-
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
mm/gup.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
mm/internal.h | 2 +-
mm/khugepaged.c | 2 +-
15 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
--
2.43.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 13:05 David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-03-27 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] mm/gup: consistently call it GUP-fast David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] mm/gup: consistently name GUP-fast functions David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-27 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-27 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-27 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 14:43 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 14:43 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 14:43 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] mm/treewide: rename CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP to CONFIG_HAVE_GUP_FAST David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 15:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 15:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] mm: use "GUP-fast" instead "fast GUP" in remaining comments David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 15:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 15:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 15:21 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] mm/gup: consistently call it GUP-fast Peter Xu
2024-03-27 15:21 ` Peter Xu
2024-03-27 15:21 ` Peter Xu
2024-03-27 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 15:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 15:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-03-27 15:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 16:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-27 16:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-27 16:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-28 5:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-28 5:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-28 5:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-28 6:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-28 6:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-28 6:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-28 7:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-28 7:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-28 7:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-28 9:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-28 9:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-28 9:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-28 17:46 ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-28 17:46 ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-28 17:46 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240327130538.680256-1-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.