From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
To: will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] perf/hisi_uncore: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation from stack
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:56:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240402105610.1695644-8-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240402105610.1695644-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask
variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack
overflow.
Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate
cpumask var in config- neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.
Use *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
index 04031450d5fe..06891d23b21c 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ int hisi_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
{
struct hisi_pmu *hisi_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct hisi_pmu,
node);
- cpumask_t pmu_online_cpus;
+ cpumask_var_t pmu_online_cpus;
unsigned int target;
if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &hisi_pmu->associated_cpus))
@@ -514,21 +514,26 @@ int hisi_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
if (hisi_pmu->on_cpu != cpu)
return 0;
+ if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&pmu_online_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
+ return 0;
+
/* Give up ownership of the PMU */
hisi_pmu->on_cpu = -1;
/* Choose a new CPU to migrate ownership of the PMU to */
- cpumask_and(&pmu_online_cpus, &hisi_pmu->associated_cpus,
+ cpumask_and(pmu_online_cpus, &hisi_pmu->associated_cpus,
cpu_online_mask);
- target = cpumask_any_but(&pmu_online_cpus, cpu);
+ target = cpumask_any_but(pmu_online_cpus, cpu);
if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
- return 0;
+ goto __free_cpumask;
perf_pmu_migrate_context(&hisi_pmu->pmu, cpu, target);
/* Use this CPU for event counting */
hisi_pmu->on_cpu = target;
WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(hisi_pmu->irq, cpumask_of(target)));
+__free_cpumask:
+ free_cpumask_var(pmu_online_cpus);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hisi_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu);
--
2.27.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
To: will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] perf/hisi_uncore: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation from stack
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:56:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240402105610.1695644-8-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240402105610.1695644-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask
variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack
overflow.
Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate
cpumask var in config- neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.
Use *cpumask_var API(s) to address it.
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
index 04031450d5fe..06891d23b21c 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ int hisi_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
{
struct hisi_pmu *hisi_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct hisi_pmu,
node);
- cpumask_t pmu_online_cpus;
+ cpumask_var_t pmu_online_cpus;
unsigned int target;
if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &hisi_pmu->associated_cpus))
@@ -514,21 +514,26 @@ int hisi_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
if (hisi_pmu->on_cpu != cpu)
return 0;
+ if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&pmu_online_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
+ return 0;
+
/* Give up ownership of the PMU */
hisi_pmu->on_cpu = -1;
/* Choose a new CPU to migrate ownership of the PMU to */
- cpumask_and(&pmu_online_cpus, &hisi_pmu->associated_cpus,
+ cpumask_and(pmu_online_cpus, &hisi_pmu->associated_cpus,
cpu_online_mask);
- target = cpumask_any_but(&pmu_online_cpus, cpu);
+ target = cpumask_any_but(pmu_online_cpus, cpu);
if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
- return 0;
+ goto __free_cpumask;
perf_pmu_migrate_context(&hisi_pmu->pmu, cpu, target);
/* Use this CPU for event counting */
hisi_pmu->on_cpu = target;
WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(hisi_pmu->irq, cpumask_of(target)));
+__free_cpumask:
+ free_cpumask_var(pmu_online_cpus);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hisi_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu);
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-02 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-02 10:56 [PATCH 0/9] perf: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation from stack Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf/alibaba_uncore_drw: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 11:06 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-02 11:06 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf/arm-cmn: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-05 14:30 ` Robin Murphy
2024-04-05 14:30 ` Robin Murphy
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf/arm_cspmu: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf/arm_dsu: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 23:58 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-02 23:58 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-03 1:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-03 1:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf/dwc_pcie: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf/hisi_pcie: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li [this message]
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf/hisi_uncore: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf/qcom_l2: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf/thunder_x2: " Dawei Li
2024-04-02 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 11:12 ` [PATCH 0/9] perf: " Mark Rutland
2024-04-02 11:12 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-02 13:40 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 13:40 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-02 14:41 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-02 14:41 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 10:41 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-03 10:41 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-03 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240402105610.1695644-8-dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
--to=dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.