From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
Cc: quic_sridsn@quicinc.com, quic_mdalam@quicinc.com, ezra@easyb.ch,
gch981213@gmail.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at,
sashal@kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com, kernel@salutedevices.com,
rockosov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Ezra Buehler <ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: spinand: Add support for 5-byte IDs
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:37:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024040509-faceless-passerby-10ad@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404121532.14755-1-ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:15:21PM +0300, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> From: Ezra Buehler <ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 34a956739d295de6010cdaafeed698ccbba87ea4 ]
This commit is already in the following releases:
6.6.24 6.7.12 6.8.3 6.9-rc1
> E.g. ESMT chips will return an identification code with a length of 5
> bytes. In order to prevent ambiguity, flash chips would actually need to
> return IDs that are up to 17 or more bytes long due to JEDEC's
> continuation scheme. I understand that if a manufacturer ID is located
> in bank N of JEDEC's database (there are currently 16 banks), N - 1
> continuation codes (7Fh) need to be added to the identification code
> (comprising of manufacturer ID and device ID). However, most flash chip
> manufacturers don't seem to implement this (correctly).
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.6.23
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.7.11
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.8.2
> Signed-off-by: Ezra Buehler <ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com>
> Tested-by: Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20240125200108.24374-2-ezra@easyb.ch
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
> ---
>
> In the patch series [1] only one patch was marked with Fixes tag, that's
> why the secon patch was not applied to 6.6.y, 6.7.y and 6.8y. It breaks
> ESMT detection flow with logs:
>
> [ 0.770730] spi-nand spi0.0: unknown raw ID c8017f7f
> [ 0.772688] spi-nand: probe of spi0.0 failed with error -524
>
> Please cherry-pick the second patch from the series to 6.6.y, 6.7.y and
> 6.8.y.
What commit id is "the second patch" here? The one referenced above?
If so, again, this is already in a released kernel, so I'm confused as
to what to do here.
thanks,
greg k-h
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
Cc: quic_sridsn@quicinc.com, quic_mdalam@quicinc.com, ezra@easyb.ch,
gch981213@gmail.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at,
sashal@kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com, kernel@salutedevices.com,
rockosov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Ezra Buehler <ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: spinand: Add support for 5-byte IDs
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:37:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024040509-faceless-passerby-10ad@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404121532.14755-1-ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:15:21PM +0300, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> From: Ezra Buehler <ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 34a956739d295de6010cdaafeed698ccbba87ea4 ]
This commit is already in the following releases:
6.6.24 6.7.12 6.8.3 6.9-rc1
> E.g. ESMT chips will return an identification code with a length of 5
> bytes. In order to prevent ambiguity, flash chips would actually need to
> return IDs that are up to 17 or more bytes long due to JEDEC's
> continuation scheme. I understand that if a manufacturer ID is located
> in bank N of JEDEC's database (there are currently 16 banks), N - 1
> continuation codes (7Fh) need to be added to the identification code
> (comprising of manufacturer ID and device ID). However, most flash chip
> manufacturers don't seem to implement this (correctly).
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.6.23
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.7.11
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.8.2
> Signed-off-by: Ezra Buehler <ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com>
> Tested-by: Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20240125200108.24374-2-ezra@easyb.ch
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
> ---
>
> In the patch series [1] only one patch was marked with Fixes tag, that's
> why the secon patch was not applied to 6.6.y, 6.7.y and 6.8y. It breaks
> ESMT detection flow with logs:
>
> [ 0.770730] spi-nand spi0.0: unknown raw ID c8017f7f
> [ 0.772688] spi-nand: probe of spi0.0 failed with error -524
>
> Please cherry-pick the second patch from the series to 6.6.y, 6.7.y and
> 6.8.y.
What commit id is "the second patch" here? The one referenced above?
If so, again, this is already in a released kernel, so I'm confused as
to what to do here.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-05 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 12:15 [PATCH v1] mtd: spinand: Add support for 5-byte IDs Dmitry Rokosov
2024-04-04 12:15 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2024-04-05 6:37 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-04-05 6:37 ` Greg KH
2024-04-05 9:03 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2024-04-05 9:03 ` Dmitry Rokosov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024040509-faceless-passerby-10ad@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ddrokosov@salutedevices.com \
--cc=ezra.buehler@husqvarnagroup.com \
--cc=ezra@easyb.ch \
--cc=gch981213@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@salutedevices.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com \
--cc=quic_mdalam@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sridsn@quicinc.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=rockosov@gmail.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.