All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>,
	"Richard Fitzgerald" <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] regmap: kunit: Add more cache-sync tests
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:45:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240408144600.230848-8-rf@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240408144600.230848-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>

Extend the testing of cache-sync.

- cache_sync() renamed cache_sync_marked_dirty() for clarity of
  what conditions it is testing.

- cache_sync_defaults() renamed cache_sync_defaults_marked_dirty()
  for clarity. Added code to write the register back to its default
  value to check that a dirty sync doesn't write out the default value.

- Added cache_sync_after_cache_only(). Tests syncing the cache without
  calling regcache_mark_dirty(). A register written while in cache-only
  should be written out by regcache_sync().

- Added cache_sync_default_after_cache_only. This is similar to
  cache_sync_after_cache_only(), but the register is changed to its
  default value while in cache-only. Because regcache_mark_dirty() was
  NOT called, regacache_sync() should write out the register.

Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
 drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
index 3201f5f6406b..1b34f92b1aaf 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static void cache_bypass(struct kunit *test)
 	regmap_exit(map);
 }
 
-static void cache_sync(struct kunit *test)
+static void cache_sync_marked_dirty(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
 	struct regmap *map;
@@ -743,7 +743,58 @@ static void cache_sync(struct kunit *test)
 	regmap_exit(map);
 }
 
-static void cache_sync_defaults(struct kunit *test)
+static void cache_sync_after_cache_only(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
+	struct regmap *map;
+	struct regmap_config config;
+	struct regmap_ram_data *data;
+	unsigned int val[BLOCK_TEST_SIZE];
+	unsigned int val_mask;
+	int i;
+
+	config = test_regmap_config;
+
+	map = gen_regmap(test, &config, &data);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(map));
+	if (IS_ERR(map))
+		return;
+
+	val_mask = GENMASK(config.val_bits - 1, 0);
+	get_random_bytes(&val, sizeof(val));
+
+	/* Put some data into the cache */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_bulk_write(map, param->from_reg, val,
+						   BLOCK_TEST_SIZE));
+	for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+		data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+
+	/* Set cache-only and change the values */
+	regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(val); ++i)
+		val[i] = ~val[i] & val_mask;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_bulk_write(map, param->from_reg, val,
+						   BLOCK_TEST_SIZE));
+	for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ(test, &data->vals[param->from_reg], val, sizeof(val));
+
+	/* Exit cache-only and sync the cache without marking hardware registers dirty */
+	regcache_cache_only(map, false);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+	/* Did we just write the correct data out? */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, &data->vals[param->from_reg], val, sizeof(val));
+	for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+	regmap_exit(map);
+}
+
+static void cache_sync_defaults_marked_dirty(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
 	struct regmap *map;
@@ -775,6 +826,71 @@ static void cache_sync_defaults(struct kunit *test)
 	for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
 		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i == 2, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
 
+	/* Rewrite registers back to their defaults */
+	for (i = 0; i < config.num_reg_defaults; ++i)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, config.reg_defaults[i].reg,
+						      config.reg_defaults[i].def));
+
+	/*
+	 * Resync after regcache_mark_dirty() should not write out registers
+	 * that are at default value
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+		data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+	regcache_mark_dirty(map);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+	for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+	regmap_exit(map);
+}
+
+static void cache_sync_default_after_cache_only(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
+	struct regmap *map;
+	struct regmap_config config;
+	struct regmap_ram_data *data;
+	unsigned int orig_val;
+	int i;
+
+	config = test_regmap_config;
+	config.num_reg_defaults = BLOCK_TEST_SIZE;
+
+	map = gen_regmap(test, &config, &data);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(map));
+	if (IS_ERR(map))
+		return;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read(map, param->from_reg + 2, &orig_val));
+
+	/* Enter cache-only and change the value of one register */
+	regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, param->from_reg + 2, orig_val + 1));
+
+	/* Exit cache-only and resync, should write out the changed register */
+	regcache_cache_only(map, false);
+	for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+		data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+	/* Was the register written out? */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + 2]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data->vals[param->from_reg + 2], orig_val + 1);
+
+	/* Enter cache-only and write register back to its default value */
+	regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, param->from_reg + 2, orig_val));
+
+	/* Resync should write out the new value */
+	regcache_cache_only(map, false);
+	for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+		data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + 2]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data->vals[param->from_reg + 2], orig_val);
+
 	regmap_exit(map);
 }
 
@@ -1590,8 +1706,10 @@ static struct kunit_case regmap_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(basic_ranges, regcache_types_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(stress_insert, regcache_types_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_bypass, real_cache_types_gen_params),
-	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_sync, real_cache_types_gen_params),
-	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_sync_defaults, real_cache_types_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_sync_marked_dirty, real_cache_types_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_sync_after_cache_only, real_cache_types_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_sync_defaults_marked_dirty, real_cache_types_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_sync_default_after_cache_only, real_cache_types_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_sync_readonly, real_cache_types_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_sync_patch, real_cache_types_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_drop, sparse_cache_types_gen_params),
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-08 14:45 [PATCH 00/11] regmap: kunit: Add some test cases and a few small improvements Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] regmap: kunit: Fix warnings of implicit casts to __le16 and __be16 Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] regmap: kunit: Create a struct device for the regmap Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] regmap: kunit: Introduce struct for test case parameters Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] regmap: kunit: Run sparse cache tests at non-zero register addresses Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-16 19:53   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-17 11:28     ` Mark Brown
2024-05-17 15:19       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-05-17 11:58     ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-17 13:10     ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-17 15:44     ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-17 15:57       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] regmap: kunit: Run non-sparse " Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] regmap: kunit: Add more cache-drop tests Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` Richard Fitzgerald [this message]
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 08/11] regmap: kunit: Use a KUnit action to call regmap_exit() Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 09/11] regmap: kunit: Replace a kmalloc/kfree() pair with KUnit-managed alloc Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 10/11] regmap: kunit: Add cache-drop test with multiple cache blocks Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-08 14:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] regmap: kunit: Add test cases for regmap_read_bypassed() Richard Fitzgerald
2024-04-09 23:34 ` [PATCH 00/11] regmap: kunit: Add some test cases and a few small improvements Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240408144600.230848-8-rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --to=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.