From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: API break, sysfs "capability" file
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:38:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240417163848.GA8345@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zh_4UbT0m12EAFc3@gardel-login>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 06:26:57PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Hmm, so you want to generically allow toggling the flag from
> userspace? I mean that'd be fine with me, but it would feel a bit
> weird if you let's say have a partition block device, where you'd
> toggle this, and then you have two levels of part scanning, and then
> you toggle it on one of the part block devices there and so on, and so
> on. Could that work at all with the major/minor allocation stuff?
Oh, no - I do not want to allow toggling it on the device for
partitions. That would always fail.
> But let's say you add such a user-controlled thing, if you'd add that
> I figure you really also need a way to query the current state, right?
> which is basically what I originally was looking for...
Yes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 15:13 API break, sysfs "capability" file Lennart Poettering
2024-04-08 17:43 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-08 18:41 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-08 20:23 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-08 22:41 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-09 6:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-09 8:19 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-09 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 15:17 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 9:26 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-17 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 14:18 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 14:25 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:33 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-24 8:09 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-25 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 14:23 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:44 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-17 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 15:48 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 15:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:10 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:26 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 16:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-18 6:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240417163848.GA8345@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.