From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>
Subject: Re: API break, sysfs "capability" file
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:08:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240425130844.GA6022@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ef0ac71-21dd-46d7-a0c1-1b1b391e51a8@leemhuis.info>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:09:35AM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> Jens, quick question: what's the plan forward here and who will realize
> what you outlined?
>
> I'm asking, as afaics nothing happened for a week (hope I didn't miss
> anything!). Sure, it's not a regression from the last cycle or so, so
> it's not that urgent. But hch's "It is not a regression at all" last
> week made me worry that this in the end might not be solved unless
> somebody has it on the todo list. Normally I would have CCed Linus at
> that point anyway to get his stance, but from your statements it sounds
> like this is unnecessary here.
I'll get to adding a real interface in a bit. Sorry, I've been
a little too busy the last days.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 15:13 API break, sysfs "capability" file Lennart Poettering
2024-04-08 17:43 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-08 18:41 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-08 20:23 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-08 22:41 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-09 6:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-09 8:19 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-09 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 15:17 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 9:26 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-17 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 14:18 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 14:25 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:33 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-24 8:09 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-25 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-16 14:23 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:44 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-17 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 15:48 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 15:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:10 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:26 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 16:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 6:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240425130844.GA6022@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.