All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
	Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>,
	Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: puranjay12@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf, arm64: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:35:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424173550.16359-3-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240424173550.16359-1-puranjay@kernel.org>

As ARM64 JIT now implements BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG instruction, inline
bpf_get_smp_processor_id().

ARM64 uses the per-cpu variable cpu_number to store the cpu id.

Here is how the BPF and ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit:

                                         BPF
         		                =====
              BEFORE                                       AFTER
             --------                                     -------

int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();           int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
(85) call bpf_get_smp_processor_id#229032       (18) r0 = 0xffff800082072008
                                                (bf) r0 = r0
                                                (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)

				      ARM64 JIT
				     ===========

              BEFORE                                       AFTER
             --------                                     -------

int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();      int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
mov     x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0           mov     x7, #0xffff8000ffffffff
movk    x10, #0x802b, lsl #16              movk    x7, #0x8207, lsl #16
movk    x10, #0x8000, lsl #32              movk    x7, #0x2008
blr     x10                                mrs     x10, tpidr_el1
add     x7, x0, #0x0                       add     x7, x7, x10
                                           ldr     w7, [x7]

Performance improvement using benchmark[1]

             BEFORE                                       AFTER
            --------                                     -------

glob-arr-inc   :   23.817 ± 0.019M/s      glob-arr-inc   :   24.631 ± 0.027M/s
arr-inc        :   23.253 ± 0.019M/s      arr-inc        :   23.742 ± 0.023M/s
hash-inc       :   12.258 ± 0.010M/s      hash-inc       :   12.625 ± 0.004M/s

[1] https://github.com/anakryiko/linux/commit/8dec900975ef

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 9715c88cc025..3373be261889 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20205,7 +20205,7 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			goto next_insn;
 		}
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
 		/* Implement bpf_get_smp_processor_id() inline. */
 		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id &&
 		    prog->jit_requested && bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn()) {
@@ -20214,11 +20214,20 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			 * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
 			 * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
 			 */
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
 			insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
 			insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
 			insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
 			cnt = 3;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
+			struct bpf_insn cpu_number_addr[2] = { BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, (u64)&cpu_number) };
 
+			insn_buf[0] = cpu_number_addr[0];
+			insn_buf[1] = cpu_number_addr[1];
+			insn_buf[2] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
+			insn_buf[3] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
+			cnt = 4;
+#endif
 			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
 			if (!new_prog)
 				return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.40.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
	Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>,
	Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: puranjay12@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf, arm64: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:35:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424173550.16359-3-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240424173550.16359-1-puranjay@kernel.org>

As ARM64 JIT now implements BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG instruction, inline
bpf_get_smp_processor_id().

ARM64 uses the per-cpu variable cpu_number to store the cpu id.

Here is how the BPF and ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit:

                                         BPF
         		                =====
              BEFORE                                       AFTER
             --------                                     -------

int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();           int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
(85) call bpf_get_smp_processor_id#229032       (18) r0 = 0xffff800082072008
                                                (bf) r0 = r0
                                                (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)

				      ARM64 JIT
				     ===========

              BEFORE                                       AFTER
             --------                                     -------

int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();      int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
mov     x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0           mov     x7, #0xffff8000ffffffff
movk    x10, #0x802b, lsl #16              movk    x7, #0x8207, lsl #16
movk    x10, #0x8000, lsl #32              movk    x7, #0x2008
blr     x10                                mrs     x10, tpidr_el1
add     x7, x0, #0x0                       add     x7, x7, x10
                                           ldr     w7, [x7]

Performance improvement using benchmark[1]

             BEFORE                                       AFTER
            --------                                     -------

glob-arr-inc   :   23.817 ± 0.019M/s      glob-arr-inc   :   24.631 ± 0.027M/s
arr-inc        :   23.253 ± 0.019M/s      arr-inc        :   23.742 ± 0.023M/s
hash-inc       :   12.258 ± 0.010M/s      hash-inc       :   12.625 ± 0.004M/s

[1] https://github.com/anakryiko/linux/commit/8dec900975ef

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 9715c88cc025..3373be261889 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20205,7 +20205,7 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			goto next_insn;
 		}
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
 		/* Implement bpf_get_smp_processor_id() inline. */
 		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id &&
 		    prog->jit_requested && bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn()) {
@@ -20214,11 +20214,20 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			 * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
 			 * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
 			 */
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
 			insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
 			insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
 			insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
 			cnt = 3;
+#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
+			struct bpf_insn cpu_number_addr[2] = { BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, (u64)&cpu_number) };
 
+			insn_buf[0] = cpu_number_addr[0];
+			insn_buf[1] = cpu_number_addr[1];
+			insn_buf[2] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
+			insn_buf[3] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
+			cnt = 4;
+#endif
 			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
 			if (!new_prog)
 				return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.40.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-24 17:35 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf, arm64: Support per-cpu instructions Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-24 17:35 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-24 17:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] arm64, bpf: add internal-only MOV instruction to resolve per-CPU addrs Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-24 17:35   ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-24 17:35 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2024-04-24 17:35   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf, arm64: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-24 22:01   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-24 22:01     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-25 10:14     ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-25 10:14       ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-25 18:09       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-25 18:09         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-25 18:55         ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-25 18:55           ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-25 20:43           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-25 20:43             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-26 10:26             ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-04-26 10:26               ` Puranjay Mohan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240424173550.16359-3-puranjay@kernel.org \
    --to=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xukuohai@huawei.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.