From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] selftests: openvswitch: Questions about possible enhancements
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:05:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240426070524.GW42092@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240425122151.1d5efcc2@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:21:51PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:57:19 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> > openvswitch.sh does not appear to have any dependencies on Open vSwitch
> > user-space. My understanding is that, rather, it makes use of
> > tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py to talk to the Kernel
> > using Netlink (which is also what Open vSwitch user-space does).
> >
> > My brief testing indicates that for this the only dependencies
> > when running on Amazon Linux 2 are python3 and pyroute2.
> >
> > I think that it should be possible to port pmtu.sh to use ovs-dpctl.py.
> > This would require some enhancements to ovs-dpctl.py to handle adding the
> > tunnel vports (interfaces).
> >
> > As an aside, to run the Open vSwitch tests in pmtu.sh the openvswitch
> > kernel module is needed. So I think it would make sense to add
> > CONFIG_OPENVSWITCH to tools/testing/selftests/net/config.
> >
> > That would mean that tools/testing/selftests/net/config also has all
> > the requirements to run openvswitch.sh. If so, we probably wouldn't need to
> > add tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/config or otherwise do anything
> > special to configure the kernel for openvswitch.sh.
>
> That sounds great, for simplicity we could move the ovs files down
> to the .../net/ directory. It'd be cool to not have to do that, and
> let us separate tests more clearly into directories. But right now
> every directory has its own runner so there's a high price to pay
> for a primarily aesthetic gain :(
Understood. Let's work on getting the Open vSwitch portions of pmtu.sh, and
openvswitch.sh into a little bit better shape. Then we can consider moving
the contents of tools/.../net/openvswitch/. It would certainly be nice to
have the Open vSwitch tests run automatically.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-26 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 16:44 selftests: openvswitch: Questions about possible enhancements Simon Horman
2024-04-24 17:37 ` [ovs-dev] " Simon Horman
2024-04-24 17:59 ` Benjamin Poirier
2024-04-24 18:14 ` Aaron Conole
2024-04-25 7:33 ` Simon Horman
2024-04-24 18:14 ` Aaron Conole
2024-04-25 7:40 ` Simon Horman
2024-04-25 20:00 ` Aaron Conole
2024-04-25 0:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-25 8:26 ` Simon Horman
2024-04-25 18:57 ` [ovs-dev] " Simon Horman
2024-04-25 19:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-25 20:04 ` Aaron Conole
2024-04-26 7:05 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-04-25 19:58 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240426070524.GW42092@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.