From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
<shaojijie@huawei.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>, <chenhao418@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:40:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240426164021.00006f4c@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240425124627.13764-2-hejunhao3@huawei.com>
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:46:25 +0800
Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com> wrote:
> The perf tool allows users to create event groups through following
> cmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out of
> bounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of events
> in an event_group is greater than HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS, the memory write
> overflow of event_group array occurs.
>
> Add array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation,
> and return directly when write new events are written to array bounds.
>
> There are 9 different events in an event_group.
> [1] perf stat -e '{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}'
>
> Fixes: 8404b0fbc7fb ("drivers/perf: hisi: Add driver for HiSilicon PCIe PMU")
> Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Thanks,
> ---
> drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
> index 5d1f0e9fdb08..dba399125658 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
> @@ -350,15 +350,27 @@ static bool hisi_pcie_pmu_validate_event_group(struct perf_event *event)
> return false;
>
> for (num = 0; num < counters; num++) {
> + /*
> + * If we find a related event, then it's a valid group
> + * since we don't need to allocate a new counter for it.
> + */
> if (hisi_pcie_pmu_cmp_event(event_group[num], sibling))
> break;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Otherwise it's a new event but if there's no available counter,
> + * fail the check since we cannot schedule all the events in
> + * the group simultaneously.
> + */
> + if (num == HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS)
> + return false;
> +
> if (num == counters)
> event_group[counters++] = sibling;
> }
>
> - return counters <= HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS;
> + return true;
> }
>
> static int hisi_pcie_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
<shaojijie@huawei.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>, <chenhao418@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:40:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240426164021.00006f4c@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240425124627.13764-2-hejunhao3@huawei.com>
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:46:25 +0800
Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com> wrote:
> The perf tool allows users to create event groups through following
> cmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out of
> bounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of events
> in an event_group is greater than HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS, the memory write
> overflow of event_group array occurs.
>
> Add array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation,
> and return directly when write new events are written to array bounds.
>
> There are 9 different events in an event_group.
> [1] perf stat -e '{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}'
>
> Fixes: 8404b0fbc7fb ("drivers/perf: hisi: Add driver for HiSilicon PCIe PMU")
> Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Thanks,
> ---
> drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
> index 5d1f0e9fdb08..dba399125658 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c
> @@ -350,15 +350,27 @@ static bool hisi_pcie_pmu_validate_event_group(struct perf_event *event)
> return false;
>
> for (num = 0; num < counters; num++) {
> + /*
> + * If we find a related event, then it's a valid group
> + * since we don't need to allocate a new counter for it.
> + */
> if (hisi_pcie_pmu_cmp_event(event_group[num], sibling))
> break;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Otherwise it's a new event but if there's no available counter,
> + * fail the check since we cannot schedule all the events in
> + * the group simultaneously.
> + */
> + if (num == HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS)
> + return false;
> +
> if (num == counters)
> event_group[counters++] = sibling;
> }
>
> - return counters <= HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS;
> + return true;
> }
>
> static int hisi_pcie_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-26 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-25 12:46 [PATCH 0/3] drivers/perf: hisi: Fixed some issues with hisi pmu Junhao He
2024-04-25 12:46 ` Junhao He
2024-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix out-of-bound access when valid event group Junhao He
2024-04-25 12:46 ` Junhao He
2024-04-26 10:19 ` Jijie Shao
2024-04-26 10:19 ` Jijie Shao
2024-04-26 15:40 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-26 15:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] drivers/perf: hisi: hns3: " Junhao He
2024-04-25 12:46 ` Junhao He
2024-04-26 10:19 ` Jijie Shao
2024-04-26 10:19 ` Jijie Shao
2024-04-26 15:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-26 15:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] drivers/perf: hisi: hns3: Actually use devm_add_action_or_reset() Junhao He
2024-04-25 12:46 ` Junhao He
2024-04-26 10:17 ` Jijie Shao
2024-04-26 10:17 ` Jijie Shao
2024-04-26 15:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-26 15:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-28 8:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] drivers/perf: hisi: Fixed some issues with hisi pmu Will Deacon
2024-04-28 8:59 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240426164021.00006f4c@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=chenhao418@huawei.com \
--cc=hejunhao3@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=shaojijie@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.