From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Daniel Gregory <daniel.gregory@bytedance.com>
Cc: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>,
Liang Ma <liangma@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/arm: replace RTE_BUILD_BUG on non-constant
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 14:48:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240502144826.42d7012a@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240502174420.GA3883350@ste-uk-lab-gw>
On Thu, 2 May 2024 18:44:20 +0100
Daniel Gregory <daniel.gregory@bytedance.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:20:45AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Why not:
> > diff --git a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h
> > index 5cb8b59056..81987de771 100644
> > --- a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h
> > +++ b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h
> > @@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ rte_wait_until_equal_32(volatile uint32_t *addr, uint32_t expected,
> > {
> > uint32_t value;
> >
> > + static_assert(__builtin_constant_p(memorder), "memory order is not a constant");
> > +
> > RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(memorder != rte_memory_order_acquire &&
> > memorder != rte_memory_order_relaxed);
> >
> > @@ -191,6 +193,8 @@ rte_wait_until_equal_64(volatile uint64_t *addr, uint64_t expected,
> > {
> > uint64_t value;
> >
> > + static_assert(__builtin_constant_p(memorder), "memory order is not a constant");
> > +
> > RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(memorder != rte_memory_order_acquire &&
> > memorder != rte_memory_order_relaxed);
> >
>
> What toolchain are you using? With your change I still get errors about
> the expression not being constant:
>
> In file included from ../lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause.h:13,
> from ../lib/eal/include/generic/rte_spinlock.h:25,
> from ../lib/eal/arm/include/rte_spinlock.h:17,
> from ../lib/telemetry/telemetry.c:20:
> ../lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h: In function ‘rte_wait_until_equal_16’:
> ../lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h:156:23: error: expression in static assertion is not constant
> 156 | static_assert(__builtin_constant_p(memorder), "memory order is not a constant");
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I'm cross-compiling with GCC v12.2 using the
> config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_gcc cross-file, and enabling
> RTE_ARM_USE_WFE by uncommenting it in config/arm/meson.build and setting
> its value to true.
I don't do ARM any more, suppose could build on Raspberry Pi but havent.
There are already constant checks like this elsewhere in the file. Why not this:
diff --git a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h
index 5cb8b59056..4f54f5dac3 100644
--- a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h
+++ b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h
@@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ rte_wait_until_equal_16(volatile uint16_t *addr, uint16_t expected,
{
uint16_t value;
+ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(memorder));
RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(memorder != rte_memory_order_acquire &&
memorder != rte_memory_order_relaxed);
@@ -172,6 +173,7 @@ rte_wait_until_equal_32(volatile uint32_t *addr, uint32_t expected,
{
uint32_t value;
+ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(memorder));
RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(memorder != rte_memory_order_acquire &&
memorder != rte_memory_order_relaxed);
@@ -191,6 +193,7 @@ rte_wait_until_equal_64(volatile uint64_t *addr, uint64_t expected,
{
uint64_t value;
+ RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(memorder));
RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(memorder != rte_memory_order_acquire &&
memorder != rte_memory_order_relaxed);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-02 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-02 14:21 [PATCH] eal/arm: replace RTE_BUILD_BUG on non-constant Daniel Gregory
2024-05-02 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-02 17:44 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-02 18:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-02 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-05-03 9:46 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-04 0:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-09 11:02 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-03 13:32 ` David Marchand
2024-05-03 14:21 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-03 18:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Daniel Gregory
2024-05-03 18:30 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-04 0:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-27 15:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-06-28 10:05 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-06-28 15:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-06 9:30 ` Ruifeng Wang
2024-05-11 17:00 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-10-04 17:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-08 9:47 ` Morten Brørup
2024-05-04 1:02 ` [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-09 11:11 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-09 16:47 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-05-11 16:48 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240502144826.42d7012a@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=daniel.gregory@bytedance.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=liangma@bytedance.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.