From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Daniel Gregory <daniel.gregory@bytedance.com>
Cc: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>,
Liang Ma <liangma@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/arm: replace RTE_BUILD_BUG on non-constant
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 17:56:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240503175624.54dd0a72@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503094605.GB3883350@ste-uk-lab-gw>
On Fri, 3 May 2024 10:46:05 +0100
Daniel Gregory <daniel.gregory@bytedance.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 02:48:26PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > There are already constant checks like this elsewhere in the file.
>
> Yes, but they're in macros, rather than inlined functions, so my
> understanding was that at compile time, macro expansion has put the
> memorder constant in the _Static_assert call as opposed to still being
> a function parameter in the inline definition.
Gcc and clang are smart enough that it is possible to use the internal
__builtin_constant_p() in the function. Some examples in DPDK:
static __rte_always_inline int
rte_mempool_do_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_table,
unsigned int n, struct rte_mempool_cache *cache)
{
int ret;
unsigned int remaining;
uint32_t index, len;
void **cache_objs;
/* No cache provided */
if (unlikely(cache == NULL)) {
remaining = n;
goto driver_dequeue;
}
/* The cache is a stack, so copy will be in reverse order. */
cache_objs = &cache->objs[cache->len];
if (__extension__(__builtin_constant_p(n)) && n <= cache->len) {
It should be possible to use RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON() or static_assert here.
Changing a compile time check into a runtime check means that buggy programs
blow up much later and in a confusing manner. And it impacts all code that
is doing a spin lock, certainly one of the hottest paths in DPDK.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-04 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-02 14:21 [PATCH] eal/arm: replace RTE_BUILD_BUG on non-constant Daniel Gregory
2024-05-02 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-02 17:44 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-02 18:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-02 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-03 9:46 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-04 0:56 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-05-09 11:02 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-03 13:32 ` David Marchand
2024-05-03 14:21 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-03 18:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Daniel Gregory
2024-05-03 18:30 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-04 0:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-27 15:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-06-28 10:05 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-06-28 15:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-06 9:30 ` Ruifeng Wang
2024-05-11 17:00 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-10-04 17:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-08 9:47 ` Morten Brørup
2024-05-04 1:02 ` [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2024-05-09 11:11 ` Daniel Gregory
2024-05-09 16:47 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-05-11 16:48 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240503175624.54dd0a72@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=daniel.gregory@bytedance.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=liangma@bytedance.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.