All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 02/31] report: Add known failure reporting option
Date: Sat,  4 May 2024 22:28:08 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240504122841.1177683-3-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240504122841.1177683-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

There are times we would like to test a function that is known to fail
in some conditions due to a bug in implementation (QEMU, KVM, or even
hardware). It would be nice to count these as known failures and not
report a summary failure.

xfail is not the same thing, xfail means failure is required and a pass
causes the test to fail. So add kfail for known failures.

Mark the failing ppc64 h_cede_tm and spapr_vpa tests as kfail.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 lib/libcflat.h |  2 ++
 lib/report.c   | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h
index 700f43527..ae3c2c6d0 100644
--- a/lib/libcflat.h
+++ b/lib/libcflat.h
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ extern void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 		__attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3), nonnull(2)));
 extern void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 		__attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
+extern void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+		__attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
 extern void report_abort(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 					__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
 					__attribute__((noreturn));
diff --git a/lib/report.c b/lib/report.c
index 8e9bff5b8..7f3c4f059 100644
--- a/lib/report.c
+++ b/lib/report.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #include "libcflat.h"
 #include "asm/spinlock.h"
 
-static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, skipped;
+static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, kfailures, skipped;
 static char prefixes[256];
 static struct spinlock lock;
 
@@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ void report_prefix_pop(void)
 }
 
 static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
-		bool pass, bool xfail, bool skip, va_list va)
+		bool pass, bool xfail, bool kfail, bool skip, va_list va)
 {
 	const char *prefix = skip ? "SKIP"
 				  : xfail ? (pass ? "XPASS" : "XFAIL")
-					  : (pass ? "PASS"  : "FAIL");
+				          : kfail ? (pass ? "PASS" : "KFAIL")
+					          : (pass ? "PASS"  : "FAIL");
 
 	spin_lock(&lock);
 
@@ -98,6 +99,8 @@ static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
 		skipped++;
 	else if (xfail && !pass)
 		xfailures++;
+	else if (kfail && !pass)
+		kfailures++;
 	else if (xfail || !pass)
 		failures++;
 
@@ -108,7 +111,7 @@ void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list va;
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -117,7 +120,7 @@ void report_pass(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 	va_list va;
 
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -126,7 +129,7 @@ void report_fail(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 	va_list va;
 
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -134,7 +137,19 @@ void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list va;
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, false, va);
+	va_end(va);
+}
+
+/*
+ * kfail is known failure. If kfail is true then test will succeed
+ * regardless of pass.
+ */
+void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+{
+	va_list va;
+	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, kfail, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -142,7 +157,7 @@ void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list va;
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, true, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, true, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -168,6 +183,8 @@ int report_summary(void)
 	printf("SUMMARY: %d tests", tests);
 	if (failures)
 		printf(", %d unexpected failures", failures);
+	if (kfailures)
+		printf(", %d known failures", kfailures);
 	if (xfailures)
 		printf(", %d expected failures", xfailures);
 	if (skipped)
-- 
2.43.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 02/31] report: Add known failure reporting option
Date: Sat,  4 May 2024 22:28:08 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240504122841.1177683-3-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240504122841.1177683-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

There are times we would like to test a function that is known to fail
in some conditions due to a bug in implementation (QEMU, KVM, or even
hardware). It would be nice to count these as known failures and not
report a summary failure.

xfail is not the same thing, xfail means failure is required and a pass
causes the test to fail. So add kfail for known failures.

Mark the failing ppc64 h_cede_tm and spapr_vpa tests as kfail.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 lib/libcflat.h |  2 ++
 lib/report.c   | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h
index 700f43527..ae3c2c6d0 100644
--- a/lib/libcflat.h
+++ b/lib/libcflat.h
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ extern void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 		__attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3), nonnull(2)));
 extern void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 		__attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
+extern void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+		__attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
 extern void report_abort(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 					__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
 					__attribute__((noreturn));
diff --git a/lib/report.c b/lib/report.c
index 8e9bff5b8..7f3c4f059 100644
--- a/lib/report.c
+++ b/lib/report.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #include "libcflat.h"
 #include "asm/spinlock.h"
 
-static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, skipped;
+static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, kfailures, skipped;
 static char prefixes[256];
 static struct spinlock lock;
 
@@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ void report_prefix_pop(void)
 }
 
 static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
-		bool pass, bool xfail, bool skip, va_list va)
+		bool pass, bool xfail, bool kfail, bool skip, va_list va)
 {
 	const char *prefix = skip ? "SKIP"
 				  : xfail ? (pass ? "XPASS" : "XFAIL")
-					  : (pass ? "PASS"  : "FAIL");
+				          : kfail ? (pass ? "PASS" : "KFAIL")
+					          : (pass ? "PASS"  : "FAIL");
 
 	spin_lock(&lock);
 
@@ -98,6 +99,8 @@ static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
 		skipped++;
 	else if (xfail && !pass)
 		xfailures++;
+	else if (kfail && !pass)
+		kfailures++;
 	else if (xfail || !pass)
 		failures++;
 
@@ -108,7 +111,7 @@ void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list va;
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -117,7 +120,7 @@ void report_pass(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 	va_list va;
 
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -126,7 +129,7 @@ void report_fail(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 	va_list va;
 
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -134,7 +137,19 @@ void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list va;
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, false, va);
+	va_end(va);
+}
+
+/*
+ * kfail is known failure. If kfail is true then test will succeed
+ * regardless of pass.
+ */
+void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+{
+	va_list va;
+	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, kfail, false, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -142,7 +157,7 @@ void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
 {
 	va_list va;
 	va_start(va, msg_fmt);
-	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, true, va);
+	va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, true, va);
 	va_end(va);
 }
 
@@ -168,6 +183,8 @@ int report_summary(void)
 	printf("SUMMARY: %d tests", tests);
 	if (failures)
 		printf(", %d unexpected failures", failures);
+	if (kfailures)
+		printf(", %d known failures", kfailures);
 	if (xfailures)
 		printf(", %d expected failures", xfailures);
 	if (skipped)
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-04 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-04 12:28 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 00/31] powerpc improvements Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/31] doc: update unittests doc Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06  7:03   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-06  7:03     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07  3:57     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07  3:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06  8:02   ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-06  8:02     ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-04 12:28 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2024-05-04 12:28   ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 02/31] report: Add known failure reporting option Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06  7:25   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-06  8:01     ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-06  8:01       ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-06 10:19       ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-06 10:19         ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 03/31] powerpc: Mark known failing tests as kfail Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-06  7:37   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-06  7:37     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07  4:07     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07  4:07       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 11:44       ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07 11:44         ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 04/31] powerpc: Update unittests for latest QEMU version Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 05/31] powerpc/sprs: Specify SPRs with data rather than code Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 06/31] powerpc/sprs: Avoid taking PMU interrupts caused by register fuzzing Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 07/31] scripts: allow machine option to be specified in unittests.cfg Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 15:08   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07 15:08     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 12:27     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-08 12:27       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-08 12:55       ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 12:55         ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 12:58         ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 12:58           ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 13:36           ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-08 13:36             ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-09  5:44             ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-09  5:44               ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 08/31] scripts: Accommodate powerpc powernv machine differences Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 09/31] powerpc: Support powernv machine with QEMU TCG Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 10/31] powerpc: Fix emulator illegal instruction test for powernv Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 11/31] powerpc/sprs: Test hypervisor registers on powernv machine Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 12/31] powerpc: general interrupt tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 12:12   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07 12:12     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 13/31] powerpc: Add rtas stop-self support Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 14/31] powerpc: Remove broken SMP exception stack setup Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-03  9:30   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-03  9:30     ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  5:13     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  5:13       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 15/31] powerpc: Enable page alloc operations Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-03  9:34   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-03  9:34     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 16/31] powerpc: add SMP and IPI support Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  5:14   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  5:14     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 17/31] powerpc: Add cpu_relax Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-07 13:44   ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-07 13:44     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 18/31] powerpc: Permit ACCEL=tcg,thread=single Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  5:17   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  5:17     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 19/31] powerpc: Avoid using larx/stcx. in spinlocks when only one CPU is running Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  5:27   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  5:27     ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  0:56     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-05  0:56       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 20/31] powerpc: Add atomics tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  5:29   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  5:29     ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  0:56     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-05  0:56       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 21/31] powerpc: Add timebase tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  6:12   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  6:12     ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  1:04     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-05  1:04       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 22/31] powerpc: Add MMU support Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  7:30   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  7:30     ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  1:06     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-05  1:06       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 23/31] common/sieve: Use vmalloc.h for setup_mmu definition Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  7:53   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  7:53     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 24/31] common/sieve: Support machines without MMU Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  9:30   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  9:30     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 25/31] powerpc: Add sieve.c common test Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04  9:30   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04  9:30     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 26/31] powerpc: add usermode support Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:26   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 10:26     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 27/31] powerpc: add pmu tests Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:38   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 10:38     ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  1:12     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-05  1:12       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 28/31] configure: Make arch_libdir a first-class entity Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 29/31] powerpc: Remove remnants of ppc64 directory and build structure Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:49   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 13:36     ` Andrew Jones
2024-06-04 13:36       ` Andrew Jones
2024-06-05  7:52       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-05  7:52         ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 30/31] powerpc: Add facility to query TCG or KVM host Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 10:53   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 10:53     ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-04 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 31/31] powerpc: gitlab CI update Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-04 12:28   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-04 11:01   ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 11:01     ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05  1:16     ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-05  1:16       ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240504122841.1177683-3-npiggin@gmail.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.